Jump to content

Ref question


Recommended Posts

Scenario, a play is ran by the offense, defense has twelve men on the field, however referee did not catch it. After the play the coach points out there are too many defensive players on the field. At this point the play is over and about half the offensive team is huddled and others walking toward huddle. At this point the referee counts the defensive players and then throws the flag. Is that previous play conducted with the 12 defensive players that was not caught by the referee until after the play able to be penalized? Or would they have to wait until the snap and then call it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Refs job is to try and get it right If the coach points out there were 12 defense of man and the refs count them there was he can throw the flag. How many times do you see a coach pointing out to a ref that a player is being held, majority of the time that will get called the next time that player holds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I once was a football official. The refs should have thrown the flag before the ball was snapped and save the team a 15 yard penalty and make it a 5 yard penalty instead for " breaking the huddle with 12". However, once the the ball has been snapped and you do play with 12 it should then be a 15 yard penalty. Officials try to save the team from a 15 harder but sometimes it happens. ....And yes if they do not notice it till after the play is should go back to the previous spot if it is against the offense and a 15 yard penalty should be issued. If it is against the defense then it is a spot foul or from the original line of scrimmage if there was a loss on the play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having almost no clue of the rules............

 

I thought that if the next play is snapped, the previous play is in the record books. If the next play has not been snapped, is there a time frame after a play is whistled dead when a ref can no longer throw the flag? I thought that anything was in the discretion of the refs up until the point of the next snap. I know that I have seen flags after the whistle that applied to incidents that occurred during the play itself. 

 

But like I said, having no clue.................. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I misunderstood, the next play had not been snapped. From what i understand about the scenario the officials discovered this between the plays and therefore the previous play can still be penalized. If the ball had been snapped again, then yes, all you can say as an official is"I apologize for the mistake" and then the coaches go bananas!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on your scenario, it is perfectly acceptable, by rule (3.5.3(c)), to penalize the defense after the play is over and prior to the next snap.  While it may "look" bad to have a coach point this out, getting the proper call is most important.  Regardless of when you flag the defense, before the imminent snap or after the snap/play, it is a  5 yard penalty.  There is no defense from the other coach simply b/c the opposing coach pointed it out...You still had 12 coach!

 

@fireinthehole - Should the offense have an illegal substitution (breaking the huddle with more than 11) or illegal participation (more than 11 in a play), this is also a 5 yard penalty.  The 15-yard penalty you mention is only on the 2nd offense of rushing substitutions on without allowing the defense to respond/match-up. Different than 11 on the field for a play or breaking a huddle.

 

FB is a fast-paced game with officials having tons of responsibilities before, during and after each play.  Counting players is something that is supposed to be done prior to each play.  When you watch your next game, take a look at the officials signaling one another with their arms out, closed fist, open hand or thumbs up...that sort of thing.  This is where they are telling one another the count is correct or one team has fewer than 11, etc.  If you do not see this, it is a veteran crew OR they are forgetting to count which leads to the "Oops, there are 12 out here" scenario.  Can't catch every infraction however, our goal is to catch the infractions that have a bearing on a play (i.e. - holding away from the ball will NEVER be called).  12 on the field is a biggie!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
    • See why I don't trust my Hogs?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...