thetragichippy

  It is both sides......They are all stubborn   That is why you need a President that can talk to both sides.....   Bill Clinton and Bush are two prime examples of Presidents getting things done using BOTH partys

  But the Democrats were?   LOL

  My correction....Obama could not get a budget approved

TRUCK:  1/2 ton I would go with a Tundra in a heartbeat. I had one and traded for a Ford F150 Ecoboost. Had more power, better gas mileage, etc.. At 2700 miles it died on me....ended up being a fuel injector and catalytic converter.....I raised all kind of hell and they gave me another one... ..It has 40K miles and the check engine light is on, O2 sensor or catalytic converter on right side.....plus it has been in the shop for transmission "bump"....so, not a big fan of Ford right now.   I do miss my Dodge Diesel 3/4 ton.....I had it back before they screwed up the fuel and all the emissions crap on the motors.....got 23 MPG on the highway   SUV:Jeep (Toyota if it was a selection)   Car: Ford  

  it was because Obama would not approve a budget

  No I don't

  That would be a horrible way to go.

  Read the attachment in the link.....pretty good stuff   that was all deducted from personal/sick/vacation time

Haynes owes BISD $7K in docked pay   [Hidden Content]

  Facts??? Who needs Facts???? :D

  YES   mustard gas - a toxic war gas with sulfide based compounds that raises blisters and attacks the eyes and lungs; there is no known antidote   Because it is a chemical weapon......   Educate yourself:   [Hidden Content]   [Hidden Content]

  Does "Timothy Chargois" realize that the longer he prolongs this, the more media attention he and BISD gets, which directly affects his future employment opportunities?

  How many times do I have to tell you "Underwater Basket Weaving" is NOT a degree!!!!!  B)

  What "WMD" is is very simple. There is no way we could disagree purely based on its definition, so I ask again. Explain to me what the WMD is.?   ^^see my point^^   You continued to tell me WMD's did not include chemical weapons despite the textbook definition states it.   But Obama care is a federal law providing for a fundamental reform of the U.S. healthcare and health insurance system, signed by President Barack Obama in 2010: formally called Affordable Care Act  or Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.   ^^It is a horrible law (with mostly good intentions) that was passed too quickly so Obama could make a name for himself. He and the Democratic party wanted full credit and would not even entertain a productive meeting with the republican party.   And they got what they wanted.......FULL CREDIT for this rushed bill that will be one of the many mistakes of his two terms as President

  We couldn't even agree on what WMD's are WITH me providing links to 4 different pages that gave the definition.....Do you really think we are going to agree on what obamacare is?   Not wasting my typing skills(or lack of).......   But WHATEVER it is........61% of Americans don't like it......well, according to CNN

Hey biggirl, tick toc

  I personally don't think so. If you read all the definitions that are out there, they all say chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction or at least imply that.   Now, a person can read into it what they want, but what all the definitions do have in common is the mention of chemical weapons as WMD.

Pointless, she reads one article and claims it as fact. I've posted the definition of WMD's from 3 different sites to prove they a say the same thing and all include chemical weapons.

    [Hidden Content]

  Totally agree....   I'm 48 and my Dad can still give me a look and make me lower my head.....lol

  No, because you didn't post the FULL link......   Second, you are clainmin that chemical weapons are not WMD.....and they are!   [Hidden Content]   [Hidden Content]   [Hidden Content]   Next

  That's what I thought....was just checking!   Thank you Sir!

  I am not a chemist, but I do know how to read. If you look up WMD, chemical weapons fall in to that category.

  Apparently the guy does not know what he is talking about....

  So, we can't take quotes from an article? If you were directing at me.