tvc184

Brought to you by the same county that brought us Michael Brown and hands up, don’t shoot….

I was using deductive reasoning on that one 🙂 but that wasn’t the information being put out.

According to factcheck.org, under the title of dubious Trump orders, set out in an apparent attempt to prove him wrong… but couldn’t. Former prosecutors in the article made the claim that classification is not relevant, making it appear that it isn’t an issue. The conclusion was that no one knows and the Supreme Court has not made such a ruling. It might be a huge constitutional issue and the separation of powers. Can Congress impose restraints on constitutional guarantees of a president as the commander in chief? As an example: In the impeachment of Trump, it was questioned whether the accusations against him rose to the level of a high crime or misdemeanor under the Constitution and in a comment (not an official ruling) Chief Justice Roberts said that the Supreme Court had no say so on the issue as it is an authority under Article I of the Constitution. The Supreme Court can’t override a constitutional guarantee with another branch of government. So can Congress as a branch of government, order a president, a branch of government, on what to do as the commander in chief? [Hidden Content]

If they aren’t ready, then the company and/or the school district isn’t/wasn’t being honest previously. Two weeks ago for the home opener, it was reported to be almost a game time decision on whether the stadium would be ready. Of course they had to know by Wednesday so they could get Lamar if needed and they did. We have now had two weeks of perfect weather for construction. If it still not ready, how was it “we might be able to finish by Friday”…. two weeks ago?

Watering the field doesn’t help anymore.

Notwithstanding the fact that WOS’s claim to fame is defense and Faircloth strips his defense to bolster his offensive?

Man In The Arena, Teddy Roosevelt My all time favorite quote.

Their is a term used in both Texas criminal and civil law. It is “material” or “materiality”. So while a person might not be exactly truthful, would it have any real bearing on the case or issue. If I am giving a statement to the police about some incident that I witnessed like a murder, and during the questioning the office asked, what were you doing at the time? Let’s say I told the officer I was coming back from the beach and I caught the biggest redfish of my life while I was there. Let’s say I gave a completely true statement about what I witnessed in the murder but lied about the biggest fish of my life. Would that be material as part of the investigation? Or being a banker, what if on a loan application a person said he makes about $150,000 a year gross? During a search of the records it was determined that he only made $145,000 a year on average. Is that really material? What if he claimed $500,000? So while a bank might not be a victim, if a person grossly exaggerated his worth, it could still be a law violation in falsifying a document…. depending on state law.

It depends on the laws in that state. You cat be jailed for some civil actions. A state can classify or enact a law in any manner as long as it doesn’t violate the US Constitution or their state constitution. It would be their decision by their supreme court if it follows the state constitution.

You are correct. It doesn’t take me to clear it up. Anyone can claim that they are investigating someone. Look at the big news (or comedy skit) this week about a Texas sheriff claiming that he is investigating Governor DeSantis of Florida for the Martha’s Vineyard entertainment. Sure, investigate all you want. Don’t hold your breath waiting for an indictment on that case.

Haha!! Joined just now and this if your first post?? 🤔 🤣 Either feeling very confident or trying to inspire WOS!!

Then they didn’t bump their butts….

!!final:38/14

Willowridge ball, procedure for 12 men in huddle. On 3-8, Willowridge pass is incomplete. Punt to Nederland 24. 1:27 in game, Nederland 38-14

Punt goes out at Willowridge 29 at 2:32 in game.

Nederland naturally keeping it in the ground and rolling the clock. At 5:15, everybody playing and not stopping the clock for out of bounds.

On 3-6 Willowridge is sacked for -6. On 4-12 Willowridge punts, Nederland fair catch at own 24 8:46 in game, Nederland 38-14.

Pass for 7 but the face mask Nederland. At 10:10 and rolling…

After incomplete pass, punt out of bounds about Willowridge 18.

Trosclair in for Nederland at qb. Swapping out backs also.

Screen on 3-10 gets 18. 1-10 from Willowridge 40. End of 3 !!score:38/14/4

At 2:16 in 3, Nederland 38-14

-5 run to start series. Pass completion for 0. On 3-15 pass overthrown. Punt to return to Nederland 42.

Kickoff return to Willowridge 40

!!score:38/14/3