
Englebert
Members-
Posts
5,398 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Everything posted by Englebert
-
And the one that clears the path for Iran to eventually possess nuclear weapons? I hope you realize there are other (and much better) sources of information besides the loony Left wing-nut outlets. I'm fairly confident that you don't frequent any other sources due to your incessant parroting of those propaganda machines.
-
Again, please give your rationale for making this asinine statement. I bet you won't...because when you start typing the response you will realize how pathetic your statement really was. Do you really enjoy trying to pigeonhole (stereotype) everyone? I thought you people (Liberals...clarification for Dove since I know his head was about to explode) hated stereotyping people. I can't remember who originally made this statement so I can't give them credit, but I'll use it anyway. When a Liberal starts screaming about some bad action, you can bet he is the one guilty of it.
-
Is this another example of your blinding, debilitating hate or can you enlighten us on the rationale of your expert diagnosis? I'm very anxious to diagnose your diagnosis. Sorry that the sarcasm is so obvious, but I'm tired and don't feel like sugar-coating the bait.
-
The military capabilities of each is something we know absolutely nothing about. But they know, which is probably why Kim cowered.
-
Can't answer what? What question do you think I can't or won't answer? Delirious much? And you still won't answer the question I posed (and double dogged dared you to answer). I swear, it's almost like "debating" a six year old.
-
My opinion is that we got here because Trump bowed up to a wanna-be bully and Kim cowered. More clearly, Kim is convinced that Trump is someone serious that will back up his talk. I'm in total agreement with you about being cautiously optimistic. I'm very cautious, but very hopeful. I would not be surprised at all if talks fall through. I'm still not convinced that Kim is not playing the historical worn out game, but I'm fairly confident Trump will not get played like all of the others. (And I mean "fairly" in the weakest way possible.) Trump is a businessman and is used to games like this, but the allure of notoriety can corrupt the best of them. I think Kim's decision will be predicated on how he perceives the strength and conviction of his allies/protectors, mainly China.
-
Plagiarize much? Do you find it thrilling to copy a lunatic ate up with TDS? What debate are you starting? Cut and paste is not a debate. Please pick any part of that rant to debate. I'll see you when you post it.
-
ESPN has just corrected themselves...shocking for a Liberal station. (My apologies, been on the Political forum and forgot to change modes.) Texas will play Arkansas and Texas Tech will play the winner of Florida/Auburn.
-
Just saw where ESPN is showing Texas versus Texas Tech on Sunday at 1:00 in the opening round of the CWS. I've seen on multiple previous matchups that Texas would play Arkansas and Texas Tech would play the winner of Fla/Aub. Do you have any other info?
-
You are going to do what you do best...run like a frightened schoolgirl. I laid down the challenge, but somehow you "ain't got time for that". Do you actually think you are being attacked by a gang of "trolls" when it is just me? Who are my accomplices? And please inform me of the next meeting. I've seemed to have missed the last...well, all of them. Do you actually think anyone can understand that rant? Who brought up money? Oh wait, that was you. And apparently a troll is anyone that questions the spaceball fruity-loops attacks that you throw out. Serious question, how are you not embarrassed right now? Did the high dollar cigars fry your brain? Was it the cognac? Was it the waves lapping against your deck? Was it the skunkweed? (It's easy following the immature rants of a baiter. It's almost like "I know you are but what am I"). Do you want to elevate this conversation or stay in the gutter? I'm fine either way, but I'm not sure you have the capacity for escalation. Even though I'm fully confident this will be in vein, I'll try again. Why do you feel Trump is a racist POS? If you fail to answer you are a yellow belly chicken liver lover. You've been served. I hear John Denver playing in the background.
-
I'll even expand on the bet. Folks on here like baddog, REBgp, stevenash, LumRaiderFan, BS Wildcats, 77, bullets13, TxHoops, PhatMack19, WOSGrad, AggiesAreWe, Reagan, jv_coach (forgive me...top of my head list...and yes, Txhoops is included along with Westend1 imo) and plenty of others would love nothing more than to have rationale debates on this forum. But somehow we always have to endure the trash, gutter snipe from Liberal (not Democrat) sycophants like you who see the world in black and white (skin color) and resort to deflection/personal attacks versus any serious debate. I don't know if you and your ilks have an inferiority complex or just follow the engrained Socialist handbook. But unlike the above mentioned posters, I have no qualms about going in the gutter...if only to expose the bile oozing from your pours. Can you feel the thunder of laughter all around you? Can you? I'll make a deal with you. I'll refrain from personal attacks in an attempt to get you to debate the propositions you have expounded on this thread. It would be easy to insult your intelligence, but history has shown this will only make you run. So let's agree on a rationale, civil debate on your contentions. What do you say? Please, please, please agree to a civil discussion. I really don't like embarrassing you, and it must get really frustrating for you considering you can't match wits with someone you consider your inferior. (And I'm an amateur, which makes you...) I'll start with a simple one. Why do you feel Trump is a racist POS?
-
And running. I'm continuingly laughing. Run, run, run. Anything to avoid a debate. Embarrassed much?
-
Stereotype much? I though you Liberals hated that. Would you care to guess how much I make? Do you think it is as much as Nancy Pelosi? And if the best revenge is living well, how do you feel about Trump's wealth? Hypocrite much? And how did I know that you would pull the ol' "I ain't got time for that" routine. I could buy all of your cigars if I would have made that bet. Problem is, I couldn't have gotten any takers. Do you actually feel confident or even competent in this "discussion". I'm not even good at it, but have a grin from ear to ear anticipating an attempt at a retort. Let's make another prediction...you will run like a frightened schoolgirl from an amateur debater. Anyone care to make that bet?
-
Your the comedian. (Oops, that sounded like the ol' "I know you are but what am I" gag. But I'll sink down with you in the gutter. You might live there, but I don't mind visiting from time to time.) I'm shocked you have the audacity to reply, but not surprised you will not debate. Pedophile! (Oh please, oh please ask me for proof of that last dig.)
-
Even though I'm not a betting man, I would be willing to bet a large sum of money that a Big12 or SEC team will be in the finals. LOL. I wish the CWS would flip the second round losers bracket like the women's do. From what I understand, Texas will play the winner of Arkansas/S. Carolina while Texas Tech will play the winner of Florida/Auburn in the first round.
-
Wow. Thanks for the entertaining rant. There is so much wrong in your hate-filled diatribe that I don't know where to start. Let's just be content with the notion that "most, if not all, are laughing at you, not with you." If you want to debate any of your asinine contentions, I'm more than ready. But this song and dance has been played out before...with you claiming you ain't got time for that. So I'll just continue laughing but at the same time feel sorry that people like you actually vote for our representatives. I'll continue cashing my bigger paychecks while congratulating my neighbors for cashing theirs, while you stew in the bile and audacity of prosperity.
-
You know, on second thought, maybe the aliens are much more like us than expected. Maybe they are capable of superior technological advancement, but get derailed and overwhelmed by phony, whiny, dependent, intolerant sycophants (i.e. liberal aliens) who destroy the world through their short-sighted, immoral, and detrimental policies in the worship of political correctness. Hmmm.
-
I was thinking the same thing. Aliens have/had the knowledge and technology to develop space craft to travel to and populate other worlds...years and years beyond our technology. But somehow, these advanced people cannot foresee something that our challenged "scientists" can somehow observe, measure, and state as gospel. Your statement was clear as a bell, I just felt the need to explain it further to our "Man Made Global Warming Theorists" who deride any challenge to their assumptions.
-
Here you go REBgp: [Hidden Content] Be warned though, this article is not worth wasting even 2 seconds of your life...other than the minimal entertainment value. The only thing that can be learned from this article is "how can so many nut-cases obtain college professorship jobs?" Do these people become social outcasts by avoiding anyone who will dare ask for validation of their theories?
-
Miss America to judge on self esteem not physical appearance
Englebert replied to PhatMack19's topic in Political Forum
Will the judges be required to take training classes on inherent "beauty bias"? -
I have a feeling California's travel ban will be treated just like they treat immigration law...ignore it. I'm to the point of advocating for the wall to be built along the California border with Arizona and Utah instead of the Mexican border. Can we build both?
-
It does get boring illustrating examples of Leftist hypocrisy over and over and over and over and over and over... and over and over and over and over....and over again.
-
Maybe we should all adopt your "blind and run" attitude anytime we see overt examples of racism and/or bigotry. How do you think that strategy would work out for you?
-
Some organizations separate the purchaser and financial secretary/treasurer permissions. That is, the financial secretary/treasurer has access to the bank statements, receipts, etc. but is not allowed to make purchases. The purchaser can spend the money, but does not have access to the paper trail. This setup allows the purchaser to make purchases without anyone else being present, but also ensures that same person can't hide these purchases. Of course, if the parties are in cahoots, then...
-
Texas and Texas Tech awarded as host sights. I thought one or the other would receive a bid, but didn't think both would.