Englebert

That "outright embrace of racism by the GOP" is a delusional fantasy ingrained in only the childish and sheepish of brains. How are you not embarrassed or shameless?

Scared? Yes you are scared. You are scared to defend your true feelings. You get mad because I have the audacity to challenge your insane ideas, and your go-to self-defense mechanism is to call me a racist. Please keep posting. Although you've exposed your blatant bigotry on here, I'm guessing there might be one or two that haven't caught on yet. And do you really adhere to those links you posted earlier? When reading the first one, I was aghast at how bad the "science" was, but what do you expect from a sociologist. Would you like to the discuss the garbage you tried to pass as science?

You keep wallowing in your hate, following race mongers with blind enthusiasm, and we'll keep laughing at you. If there was an alt-Left you would have to break your neck looking to the Right to find it. Your hate is blatant, undeniable, and very shameful, but for some reason I just can't keep from laughing at your posts. I know I shouldn't laugh, and I should feel empathy and sympathy, but I just can't muster those feelings when dealing with a hateful bigot who blindly and willfully displays childish emotions. I'll ask again, as you seem perturbed and willing to share your true feelings...do you think I'm racist?

Your undeniable bigotry and hate has made you a laughingstock of this board. The majority of decent people see that clear as a bell. Why can't you?

Russians posing as Chinese?

This "professor" thinks that Trump supporters will turn violent: [Hidden Content] Do universities require a stunted and absolute childish view of the world as a prerequisite for employment? Where do universities find these people? This "professor" needs to realize that it is her, and people like her, that Trump supporters abhor...people that throw out baseless and nonsensical accusations to label people. Her and her ilk are the reason Trump is the current president, and hopefully for another term. I would really like for her, or anyone, to explain the evidence that leads to her conclusion. I'm thinking the rationale for not providing evidence is that offering such means you have to defend it, and she knows she can't. So in good Liberal fashion, she just throws out baseless accusations then runs like a good little sheeple. I hope Carlson Tucker can convince her to appear on his show. I highly doubt he or anyone can bust through her air of superiority and self-attributed grandiose cognitive abilities, but at least he can expose her ridiculous claims on national TV. Oh yeah (almost forgot)...thoughts?

I'm not ate up with TDS so I'm not privileged with the fantastical delusions gleaned from innocuous behavior. Can you give some examples of this race-baiting behavior?

Liberals have desperately been trying to make this issue about race since it's inception. Anytime someones disagrees with a Liberal, it's because they are a racist, misogynist, homophobic, xenophobic deplorable. Same old song and dance. I'll wait for the imminent equivalency declaration now.

What's "acts" do you/Liberals consider as a sign of desperation?

Only in your delusional world, which is abundantly clear to everyone. Why do you even try?

I like discussing ideas when people get on here and say things like "racist GOP lawmakers are being outed on a weekly basis", or "the attorney general is dismantling Civil Rights legislation", and claim/allude to everyone on here being racist. Yeah, I like calling out ignorant statements like that. Yes you should feel dumber, because your idiotic statements were highlighted for everyone to take notice. And that is a fact. I don't extend courtesy to race mongers. And you should leave this alone, the more you post, the more embarrassing it gets for you.

I agree.

That is weak...and embarrassing...for you. I knew you wouldn't want to discuss anything. You just like throwing out baseless accusations, calling White people racist, then resort to personal attacks when challenged. The signs of the mentally weak. Maybe one day you will grow up and realize you can't blame all of your personal faults on old angry White guys.

I cured cancer, therefore it is so. I can provide links that show research being done on Hodgkin's disease, common colds, hair loss, etc., therefore I've proved my point. Don't ask me again to prove I cured cancer, or I will just refer back to my links on other diseases. Now I'm copying your strategy. Frighteningly embarrassing isn't it.

Just more embarrassment. Would you like to delve deeper into the conclusions drawn by these links. If so (and I'm laughing), I will challenge you to provide evidence of my actions that fit the mold these "researchers" are suggesting. Would you like to be embarrassed even more? And why would you hint as something when you've been challenged to state it outright. It that typical of pedophilia behavior?

You call me and many racist, I call you on it, you can't defend it, and I'm the lost cause. The laughter in thunderous. We can all hear it. Can you? Do you enjoy embarrassing yourself?

So I should do the same and just refer to you as "that pedophile". Fair is fair right! And if you get perturbed when people start referring to you as a pedophile, we will just say you need professional help. Your childishness does not go unnoticed. Bless your little heart.

There's those wild assertions again. What question did you answer? You've attempted an answer for some, ran from others. Do you even know what a circular argument is? Do bother with an attempt to answer, it is perfectly clear to the point of being rhetorical. That was not my article. I posted the first link I could find from a source that was not considered Right wing. I didn't even read it, as I have already read the story from previous listed sources. And where did you say/allude I was using your argument strategy? I missed that point. I'm assuming your strategy is to post off-topic, senseless, and baseless statements in order to deflect, which is a far cry from what I'm doing. I also missed where you answered the question of backing up your claims that the attorney general, or anyone in the Trump administration is repealing Civil Rights legislation. You claim to have answered, but have you? Please point to that tidbit of information. I'm curious as to why you're "not going there"? You seem to have hinted that you think some of my points are steeped in racism. If you want to hint at something, why not just come out and say it when directly challenged? Is the reason you won't "go there" because you know I will immediately ask you to backup your claims, and you know you can't? Do you think I have a right to question when a person levies racist accusations, especially at myself? And if I do question the veracity of those claims, should I expect the accuser to get "worked up" for me having the audacity to question a serious charge?

What makes you think I'm "working myself up". Big Girl claimed that illegals can't vote as a response to a post. I posted the links, and basically said the same thing you did...that's it's a slippery slope. You jumped into the topic, then are trying to claim I'm worked up. Are you worked up? After all, we basically said the same thing, but since I don't follow the Liberal indoctrination, does that mean I get judged on a different paradigm? Please layout your rationale for your proclamation that the attorney general is dismantling Civil Rights. What actions have been taken, or even words spoken, that lead you to believe Civil Rights legislation is in jeopardy of being repealed, or that other legislation is being considered to counteract current law? Can you backup your claims? I have I feeling I know where this will go. Will you try the deflection ploy, the personal attack ploy, the victim ploy, or will you actually engage in a debate of your claims. And just for curiosity, do you think I'm racist?

You are comical, I will give you that. The ol' "I ain't got time for that" routine is a bit overplayed by now don't you think? I challenge you to pick one of your links, even though it was not part of the initial discussion, for further analysis. Run, Forest, run. California is giving aliens the right to vote. Just like a Liberal, I guess you refuse to acknowledge news that doesn't fit your agenda. Here you go: [Hidden Content] There are more links above that I'm sure you didn't read. San Francisco is allowing illegals to vote in local school board elections. Do you dispute this? Will you post a link from Politifact that says no illegals voted in the 2016 election as proof that this link is false. We already had one try this, let's see if we get two. And how many GOP politicians were exposed as racist this week? According to you, we should have had at least one. I know the answer...all of them. And what is that legislation that the GOP is putting together that will roll back Civil Rights? Have they given it a name yet? Will it be a cute name to disguise the sinister objective like the "Affordable Care Act"?

And I told you to pick one for further discussion. You ran like a frightened schoolgirl. The laughter is just booming all around you. Your sources were answers to questions not asked, and did nothing to further your wild exclamations. Your seemingly insistence that you somehow "proved" some point is just comical, then refusing to discuss your links made it just hysterical. How to you feel about Big Girl posting a link from Politifact about voting fraud from the 2016 election, when the topic was about California giving local voting rights to illegals? Sound familiar? Is this some sort of Liberal strategy to run from outlandish statements?

Man are you confused. I gave her information from multiple sources, and she still questioned the sources. You might want to get a better comprehension of the subject matter before commenting. And it is long standing practice that when you make an allegation, the burden is on you to back up your statements. It is abundantly clear that the Liberals have no clue of this concept. You might want to re-read that pedophile example, let it sink in, and then comment on backing up statements.

When have stats ever mattered to a Liberal? The better theory is that it's overwhelmingly plausible he doesn't know what that word means to use it in such an inappropriate fashion. The laughter continues, but empathy and sadness is gaining ground.

Run, little one, run...just like you've done in the past. If you feel up to backing up your claims, bring your best. But we all know you will run just like in the past. So what will the topic be for debate? Please pick one, preferably from BearEssentials97 post of links, for further discussion (since he ran like a frightened schoolgirl). You know, the ones you had the audacity to say I was schooled on. Oh wait...run, little one, run, just like you've done in the recent past. That laughter is thunderous ain't it. And please, please, oh please, point out the talking points I've thrown out from any news source. If you had two functioning brain cells, you would realize that when dealing with the likes of "you people" (just for you Dove), I provide a platform for you yourselves to dig your hole. So please, elaborate on your childish stereotypes. Although I would longingly anticipate a debate, I bet you won't...past history has proven this.

I think we found Bagdad Bob. I was wondering where that guy ran off to.