
Englebert
Members-
Posts
5,398 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Everything posted by Englebert
-
Making a fool of oneself is a matter of perspective by the viewer/judge. You have proven to be biased and untrustworthy in your unschooled analysis in such matters, as evidenced by your continually parroting of wingnut Liberal talking points. And I'm sure you will read this and conclude that I am defending Trump, when in reality I'm criticizing your analytical abilities. I just want it to be perfectly clear. No waffling. No wavering. No ambiguity...And no chance of successful comprehension. At least I tried. Most get it.
-
Just a matter of time: [Hidden Content] In case you don't like my source: [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] I can add many more sources. The rationale for illegals given the right to vote is that they should have a say in how their kids are being taught in school. By that rationale, shouldn't they have a say in the way they are being governed? The same rationale will be used to argue for inclusion in Federal elections. In fact, in would be inconsistent and hypocritical not to. So who is grasping for straws? And speaking of grasping for straws, they are being outlawed. I guess now we will have to grasp for competent analysis and rationale debate: [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]
-
I don't agree with a lot of things Trump says. But I have no problem with him not trusting our intelligence agencies, considering sufficient evidence has emerged proving they have been biased against him. I don't trust a thing they say anymore, and with good reason. And the intelligence agencies have not proven that Russia did anything. They've just said "Russia did it, trust us". History has shown that Russia has tried to influence many of our elections...so what is new this time. Why the fake outrage now when you didn't give a rat's patootie all of the other times. It's a rhetorical question...we all know about your selective outrage.
-
Do you think you are a practicing psychologist now? Do you even know what the definition of that term is? Do you really want a car mechanic performing an operation on you? (That is the analogy you prefer, correct? I would ask you to explain why you feel my post constituted "projection", but we are all very, very, very well aware that you will run and hide from that question...which is definitely a good thing...for you.
-
Y'all need to let me know when we have these "brat pack" meetings. I've missed the last...well, all of them. Maybe I can fix up a costume out of old sheets. Does anyone know how to make that point in the hat? Nevermind, I will just wear a hoodie. Afterall, BearEssentials97 has already decreed us as racist, might as well wear the uniform. Does the hoodie have to be white? In case you are wondering BearEssentials97, yes, I am mocking you. Since baddog and LumRaiderFan has entered in on the fun, does this mean they are racist also? Please use your heightened analytical skills to determine the location of our next meeting so you can let me know. I seem to be continually left out. You're welcomed to join us, but I feel your intolerance and hatred will prevent you from attending a fictitious gathering. Too bad, because the agenda might be how to disparage a whole race of people followed by playing the victim card. You would be an asset in that discussion.
-
What questions did you answer? What am I wrong on. Your delusions are historic. Would you like me to go back in this thread and highlight my questions you did not answer. Would you liked to be embarrassed even further (I guess that's possible). I'll try again, just to add to the list of questions you won't answer. You claim you told me I was wrong several times on this thread. What point did I make that you feel I am wrong on? I share your exasperations, except mine are based on facts. There's the second grader calling his teacher and idiot again. (That thought just makes me giggle, but not the point of all out laughter like your posts.) And while you answer my questions (giggle), please elaborate on why you think my comprehension is terrible. You've shown your stunted skills for all the board to see (and laugh at), but please, illustrate what you feel are my shortcomings. I'm delighted to give you the pathway to embarrass yourself some more.
-
You use childish names to try to denigrate Trump, then accuse me and others of being childish. What a childish outlook that is. I've already admitted I would have to stoop down to your level. What is frightenly comical is that you think you are above the fray. This back and forth between you and me is in the gutter for one reason...you! (and my unreluctance to lower my standards). Go back and read your posts. You started this by calling me and others racist. You posted a picture that can only be construed as smut. And you employed the use of petty names that only a child could enjoy. You parrot nutwing Liberal talking points, not to mention your pedestrian analytical capabilities.Then you want to decree that we are childish. Again, it's like a second grader calling his teacher an idiot. We can all see this clearly. Why can't you? And let me elaborate on your pathetic analytical skills. You say we are going around in circles...when it is crystal clear that every time you post you sink a little lower on the intelligence scale. For the intellectually challenged, that is a straight, descending line...not a circle as you laughably claim. And I've asked a few questions on here that you childishly ignored. It's abundantly clear (and comical) why you ignore them. But let's try another one. What do you think I'm dead wrong on? Please elaborate. The next question is: do you feel you've embarrassed yourself enough?
-
Admit to something that has been investigated for over a year by a dream team of Trump hating overpriced lawyers? You must think we are Liberals, who blindly accept accusations with no basis or credible proof. Since you are so easily convinced/duped/blindly follow, please provide us with the evidence that has convinced you Russia helped get Trump in office. Please share. I bet you won't. I bet you can't. I'm willing to view the evidence, and would have no problem accepting the accusation that Russia influenced the elections. If there was only some proof. Hmmmm. Speaking of election fraud, how many illegals do you think voted for Trump? How many for Hillary? Please give your best guess.
-
I wholeheartedly admit I love it when you "come to play". Why would me or anyone deny that? You provide priceless comedic material. The rage and hate-filled illustrations of delusion provide many "oh wow, did he just really say that" moments. The sad part is you actually believe the garbage you espouse. What hole am I digging? The hole you keep falling in? Admit it. This isn't going well for you is it? Keep trying. The more you post, the more we get to laugh.
-
Do you not know how to read the person's name in the quote? And you want to call me an idiot. The second graders are laughing hysterically. And you do run. Every time someone asks you a pertinent question you try to defuse, deflect, obfuscate, but mainly ignore the question. Don't think we don't notice. And we are the idiots? Comedic gold. How does it feel to live in a world of denial?
-
So did Trump, but you accuse him of schmoozing. So let's recap. Obama imposed sanctions and kicked Russians out of the US. And you interpret that as being tough on Putin. Trump imposed tougher sanctions on Russian and kicked many more Russians out of the US. And you interpret that as Trump schmoozing with Putin. I guess it's hard to keep your facts straight when relying on the Liberal news to tell you how think. Did Obama kick the Russians out before or after he want dancing and to a ballgame with Castro?
-
Man, the Liberal press has done a number on you. You are comical...well, comical to us. It's like seeing a second grader calling his teacher an idiot. Keep trying. I will give you kudos. You didn't run like every other time. I'm not sure that was in your best interest though.
-
What did I deny? The more you run your mouth the dumber you sound. You call me a racist, but somehow I'm supposed to be the "bad guy" harboring racial resentment? That's childish logic, and just flat comical...and very insightful as to your cognitive abilities. I'm not sure if it's your hatred for Trump or just all non-Liberals (i.e. sane people), but your failure to recognize these shortcomings is simultaneously hilarious and sad. Now on to Trump...please give some examples of what you consider as capitulation to Putin by Trump. The Liberal media is making you look even more foolish, and I'm anxious to hear what you can parrot in a comical attempt of reasoning. Was it the ratcheting up of sanctions on Russia? Was the killing of Russian soldiers? Was it the ousting of Russian diplomats from the U.S.? Was it the bombing of Syria? Please enlighten us.
-
So in your eyes I will be mad if another "brotha" is elected president. I don't want you to call me a racist, I'm calling you out for actually doing it. But maybe I overestimated your comprehension abilities of your own statements. Maybe if you stay away from reprehensible stereotyping of White people then we can debate your obviously sophomoric contentions of Trump....which again, still won't go well for you. Considering your previous posts (yes, I will use them against you), why on Earth would you think I would be mad if a "brotha" was elected president? Please explain the contention of that statement. Maybe when you try to articulate your thoughts, that little light bulb will go off above your head. Just joking, you knew exactly what you meant when you made that statement. And so did we.
-
Can even you comprehend that statement? I can go low, but that's a little too low for baby talk. Care to translate? By the way, please...oh, please, try to use my posts against me. That would give us even more insight to your stunted mentality. Seriously, I'm anxious to read your comprehension and understanding of my posts. Fair warning...your attempts of comprehension will only lead to laughter, with a thunderous exclamation point. But please feel free to try. You did threaten to do it. Don't run...do it! And how about throwing that race card out again while your at it. We know that is your go-to show-stopper, unless...
-
Now that is deserving of the "thanks for the laugh". Do you hear the laughter? I knew you would run. You talk like you want a debate, but tuck tail as soon as challenged. I guess in your delusional intellectual prowess you really consider playing the typical race card as "throwing gasoline". How are you not ashamed at playing weak, asinine, predictable, and juvenile quips, then laughably insinuate you are intellectually superior. Again, the laughter is not directed with you...but by now you must know that. Keep trying, the entertainment value is priceless. (Now I feel like a true Liberal moron when I can escalate a pedestrian statement into the "priceless" category. Maybe I can aspire to the fake outrage category now.)
-
Much obliged. You provide loads of entertainment for us....and we are not laughing with you. Would you care to call me a racist again? I would love to debate you on your terms. The gutter is just where I live when dealing with the likes of perpetual victims masquerading as intellectuals. See, I can do it too...although I highly doubt you can figure out that line. But the rest of us can. Please don't run and hide like you normally do. This has all the expectations as a fun exercise in brainlessness...and entertainment (for some). I'm still laughing.
-
Did you forget your "brotha" smoozed up to Putin like a smitten schoolgirl. You brought no substance to this thread, only to inject race and smut. You must be proud (but embarrassed). You've displayed your comprehension skills on this forum on multiple occasions, so it is not surprising this topic is way beyond your skillset of discernment (well, lack of). And for your information, none of us care if another "brotha" is elected president, as long as that one is way more competent than the last one.
-
I totally agree. The longer he stays, the more times the Liberals show their true colors. They are even admitting they are communists now. Many straight out admit they are for total gun confiscation. Many admit to being anti-Christian. Many admit to hating White people. These people used to conceal their bigotry and hatred. Trump has somehow unleashed the bile within them. We couldn't even imagine a better display of the true evilness of Liberals. Yep, totally agree...never a dull moment with due to him.
-
If your source is Politifact you have no business being in an adult conversation. That is one of the worst publications on the planet. They are the very definition of "fake news". Do you think Obama would have dared killed Russian soldiers? Obama levied sanctions on Russia, Trump ramped them up even tougher. And I distinctly remember Obama chastising Mitt Romey saying "the cold war is over. The 80s called and wants their foreign policy back". Remember that? Do you remember Obama telling a Russian administrator that he would have more flexibility after the elections? Remember that? Do you remember Obama's red line? Do you remember Obama saying that we should restore relations with Russia. Trump does just that, and your response is that Trump is afraid of Putin. If your point has any iota of truth then you would see Trump capitulating to Putin...but the opposite has happened. He has been tougher on Putin that Obama ever was. So who again is/was afraid of Putin? I guess if Trump gave Putin an ipod preloaded with his speeches, or a fake reset button that said "overcharge", then that would be (in your eyes) tough on Putin. Your sources of information are not doing you any favors. And I noticed you just glossed over and failed to acknowledge the salient point of my post. Why the outrage now, but not then? "Then" being when Obama was in charge while Russian and Chinese hackers were stealing our military secrets, hacking every government agency, hacking voter rolls, etc. Yet Obama did absolutely nothing, and no outrage. The only thing different now is that Trump is in charge, so the level of accountability mysteriously changes. Again, why the outrage now but not then? We know the answer even though you won't admit it?
-
Exactly. It's hard to take any of these quacks seriously on anything since their blatant hypocrisy is on full display. If we had competent reporters/interviewers then these hacks would be forced to explain their selective outrage.
-
For different reasons. He said he told Putin "to cut it out". Oooooh, such tough talk. Why no outrage then? And why no outrage when Obama spent taxpayer money to meddle in the Israeli elections?
-
I find the reactions to Trump's meeting as very shameful, embarrassing, and hypocritical by everyone criticizing Trump...those who are screaming now but did not say one peep about Russian and Chinese hacking while Obama was in office. Nor did any of these critics cry outrage over Obama's meddling in the Israeli election. The fake outrage now, or even genuine outrage, is severely overplayed and comical. If these hacks are so outraged now, they should have been just as outraged during Obama's tenure.
-
Former First Lady Laura Bush - Opinion Regarding Immigration
Englebert replied to 1989NDN's topic in Political Forum
I haven't been keeping up with the news lately, so forgive me if I missed this. A judge has ordered ICE to re-unite kids with their parents that have been arrested for crossing the border illegally. As little as I know about this issue, my understanding was that illegal border crossers will be arrested. Any minor illegally crossing the border will also be detained, but cannot be incarcerated in an adult detention center...thus separation of kids from parents. Now I hear that a judge has ordered ICE to reunite the families. In what little I know, this judgement seems to be in violation of federal law. My question to the law scholars out here is what authority does this judge have to make a ruling that defies federal law. Again, I have not kept up with this issue and the judgement could be perfectly okay, but is contrary to my rudimentary understanding of the law. Wil someone please explain? -
I have a question: currently, as the laws stand now, can charges of aiding and abetting be brought against someone harboring illegal aliens? If Diane Black's bill proposal becomes law, and illegal presence in the U.S. becomes a felony, can charges of aiding and abetting be brought then? I have no idea on either question. Does someone out there know precisely the current law and potential law on this?