pdawg119

I honestly feel like the apocalypse has just started.

When does God laugh? Every time he posts on social media.

I voted for neither. I picked Gary Johnson (Libertarian) in 2016.

Honestly wouldn't be surprised if we found out that he's addicted to opiates/prescription painkillers.

On 6/8/2017 at 11:37 AM, L-Train11 said:

Nope, was just wondering why you said they would start out 0-2 instead of 0-3... why stop at the Nederland game?

Probably a Nerdland Poodles fan.

2 hours ago, Red Dawn said:

I'm a homer but I still have Crosby +14 over BH. 

This game will be at the Hill this year, so I'm expecting this game to be a one-possession game.

4 hours ago, CCRed said:

What "jump" did BH make ?  Didn't they finish fourth in district ?  I don't see that as a jump and I sure don't see them winning district this year. 

BH went 8-2 during the regular season last year, finishing 3rd in district. Their only losses came to Crosby and NC, both of which were on the road. If anything, it's a pretty good jump from 4-6 the previous year.

37 minutes ago, CCRed said:

 

By these predictions, you're saying Crosby will lose to BH.  I don't see that happening but I guess anything is possible. I don't see Dayton making the playoffs either.

Actually I basically have BH, Crosby, and NC finishing in a 3-way tie for the DC.

Dayton 6-4 lose to PNG in round 1. 6-5 overall

Crosby 8-2 goes 2 rounds deep to go 9-3.

Barbers Hill 9-1, going 3 rounds deep in the playoffs for an 11-2 season.

Left: 3.81

Libertarian: 5.67

12 hours ago, ECBucFan said:

Dalhart vs. Brownsville

El Paso vs. WO-S.

Play a "home and away" 2 game series. 

 

I believe you mean Dalhart vs. Brownsville Lopez and Canutillo vs. WO-S.

Also, Anthony vs. Sabine Pass

Anthony vs. Deweyville

Booker vs. Santa Maria

3 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

Or go with the party that elected guy who said 'just grab 'em by the p#$y.

That wasn't the real problem with Trump when he said that. I had a problem with "I don't even wait."

4 minutes ago, pdawg119 said:

The reason why those things were ruled unconstitutional was because they were done by public (that means run by the government) schools, which is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment. If you wanted your kids to be required to pray in school and take Bible classes, you could just fork over some money and take them to a private school like Kelly, Legacy, or OCC, but that's none of my business.

Forgot one thing. Christianity can be taught in public schools, BUT it must be taught alongside other religions. This is usually done in high schools during Freshman Geography or Sophomore World History classes, and is taught alongside Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and sometimes, Sikhism, Confucianism, Shinto, and Daoism.

8 hours ago, tvc184 said:

You say some really crazy and at times downright idiotic things but I let me go by as to not take up too much time. Sometimes however........

Tyranny? Persecution? Strife?

First a little history. School prayer was allowed in this country under the US Constitution until 1962 in Engel v. Vitale when the Supreme Court ruled that saying a nondenominational prayer before school violated the First Amendment under freedom of religion or what is called the establishment clause. Up until 1962 and almost 200 years of history in this country, how much tyranny happened? How much strife? 

I am not knocking the ruling but the belief that we suffered strife and tyranny because a person said a prayer. And what was the prayer that was ruled on? Here is the tyrannical prayer..... "Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and beg Thy blessings upon us, our teachers, and our country.". 

It didn't acknowledge which god. Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Greek mythology? Please bless our country. Yep, until 1962 that was legal. For almost 200 years we suffered due to that.

Up until the year 2000 it was legal for student led prayer at functions like high school football games when a case from right down the road in Santa Fe, TX had their student policy banned by the high court. So more than 200 years this time, we suffered strife, tyranny and persecution because prayers were said over the loud speaker. Mind you, it is still legal to pray but it can't be done over the school (government owned) public address system. Prayer has not and cannot constitutionally be banned. The only prohibition is over whose system (taxpayer's money) it is said with as a matter of the First Amendment. I am not even sure how we survived as a country due to football game prayers. Horrible........

Back to your nonsensical rants. I will not likely respond to them as being too obvious to require a response. Even for you the claims of tyranny and strife seems over the top.....

 

The reason why those things were ruled unconstitutional was because they were done by public (that means run by the government) schools, which is a violation of the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment. If you wanted your kids to be required to pray in school and take Bible classes, you could just fork over some money and take them to a private school like Kelly, Legacy, or OCC, but that's none of my business.

Barbers Hill vs. Corpus Christi Calallen - basically would be a battle between two legendary head coaches: Tom Westerberg vs. Phil Danaher.

8 hours ago, pakronos said:

i'm not trying to stir the pot, but i don't think ANY 21-5A is going past rd 1...maybe dayton and Crosby and that's a BIG maybe. PAM and PNG will be the top dogs with PAM improving at the QB position and Hines still running the ball. PN-G brings back the top QB in the district with almost the same team. Central with a new coach and the athletes they have, they SHOULD  get past the first round. Now, Nederland should be back, but not sure how good they will be. that might be the only way a 21-5a advances...yes i know, the game is played on the field. based on last years teams...i see the golden triangle rolling on to rd two.

On 4/15/2017 at 8:18 AM, BS Wildcats said:

Democrats

Back when the Democrats were the conservative party (Dixiecrats).

18 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Trump is proving you wrong...again.

Trump's first executive order was a tax increase on first time home buyers. Such a great president.

Let's also not forget that he has had a history of supporting universal healthcare. 

Except even President Trump supported having single-payer healthcare.

What United did basically gave me another reason why I prefer to fly Southwest.

4 hours ago, Big girl said:

Isnt Breitbart owned by a white nationalist?

I know that Breitbart is a conservative source, but I doubt it's a white nationalist site. A white nationalist site would be something like Daily Stormer.

The force is strong with this one...

The problem is that almost all of our politicians (approx. 90% of Republicans and 65% of Democrats) aren't serving the American people; they're serving their donors.