setxathlete14

I disagree. They will have a great coach either way. However that's all I can think of when lcm hired Todd Moody. Which was my experience lol

You're right I'm sure the opinion is weighed heavily on of someone who carries a school logo of whom hasn't won more than 5 games in how many years and opted up to face potentially "less competitive" schools. But what do I know ha..

Orangefield isn't just about football. I think that's where the difference may lie.

Maybe personality traits and/or goals with ALL the sports come to play in the interviews

Well maybe the new AD will come in and work to clear some of these discrepancies.

Maybe that's the problem. They should be running same stuff. I know peevy worked getting the same concepts for the kids all the way down to the peewee levels at lcm. That's important. Pretty sure WOS has always ran similar systems all the way down too.

There's no logical reason in my opinion other than thinking it's easier competition in their minds

And still won't be competing for any better placing in district.

Care to elaborate? Because that's a hilarious assumption 🤣🤣🤣

BC will not be in the 4th seed while playing up. Even though they think it's an easier schedule. It will be the same outcomes I believe. Them opting up if true is a sign of weakness not strength

Well time well tell. Bc just got their coach.

I disagree. I'd say that more about BC than OF personally..

Absolutely right. He has always said you can't win the Kentucky derby with a mule lol

In simple, it's not wrong. My shapes may be wrong. Triangle has 3 points I believe and it's those 3 listed. Beaumont, PA and orange

Huge blow for lcm... Either way we knew he would be/ is on borrowed time for more opportunities

Good. Case closed right? Or 9 more pages coming 😂

It works better for some. OF being one... LCM for whatever reason was less successful with it.. OF has had more winning seasons with that offense than any other. Not saying they can't or won't. But they operate better from the slot T

Show me another orangefield offense that produced better...

They have a pretty good passer coming up because someones nephew or son can throw the Pigskin a quarter mile they want to change the offense to pro style again for 2 years to cater to the said prolific passer. And go sub .500s trying to throw it deep every play.

In short, proof is in the pudding that (Orangefield) historically operates the best out of the slot t... records show that.. for whatever reason that may be.

To note, you compare that to ORANGEFIELD non slot t production. It is successful with better output. Non slot t offenses were far worse speaking for OF

Point made. Thanks for the facts to back it

Historically I'd say they've had more offensive success in the slot t than any other offense.

Some don't know the true value of the latter at the current school. Selfishly, Hopefully we get to keep him

Can he run too? Won't need to throw if he can run