oldschool2

I think EC will win it...and LM will get 2nd. We'll see...but that my opinion.

Oh ok. You aren't much of a stats guy? Because I'm pretty sure I said he was the best...ON PAPER. So leading every single category would constitute best in my eyes. Last I checked it takes more than one player to win a championship.

Jasper

People can say what they want...Romo is the best quarterback in Dallas Cowboys history. On paper anyway. Player Seasons Att Cmp Pct Yds YPA TD Int Lg Rate Tony Romo 2004-17 4,335 2,829 65.3 34,183 7.9 248 117 85t 97.1 Roger Staubach 1969-79 2,958 1,685 57.0 22,700 7.7 153 109 91t 83.4 Don Meredith 1960-68 2,308 1,170 50.7 17,199 7.5 135 111 95t 74.8 Danny White 1976-88 2,950 1,761 59.7 21,959 7.4 155 132 80t 81.7 Troy Aikman 1989-00 4,715 2,898 61.5 32,942 7.0 165 141 90t 81.6

"Region III W9-Malakoff vs. F10-Cameron Yoe R12-LaMarque vs. T11-Coldspring W10-Rockdale vs. F9-Groesbeck R11-Buna vs. T12-East Chambers W11-Woodville vs. F12-Hempstead R10-Franklin vs. T9-Teague W12-Hitchcock vs. F11-Kirbyville R9-West vs. T10-McGregor" I think he's gonna miss that one. At least with district 12

44-16. Almost halftime

False. If Kirbyville was 6-0 nobody (at Kirbyville) would care what they’re doing or how they’re conditioning.

1. Beaumont Central 2. Woodville 3. Gilmer Union Hill 4. Lufkin 5. The Woodlands 6. C.E. King 7. Crosby 8. Nederland 9. Port Arthur Memorial 10. Port Neche-Groves 11. Huffman Hargrave 12. Little Cypress-Mauriceville 13. Navasota 14. Madisonville 15. Tarkington 16. Liberty 17. West Orange-Stark 18. La Marque 19. East Chambers 20. Newton 21. San Augustine 22. Lovelady 23. Evadale 24. Hull-Daisetta 25. Kirbyville

Because getting a group of 10 or less kids can be a lot more easily done than a group of 30+. Numbers don't always matter in basketball because it might literally come down to a starting 5 vs a starting 5. Numbers are THE difference in football most of the time. A few years ago Big Sandy had 5 kids (out of 100 or so total) that were as good or better than any group of 5 kids from any school in the area.

Some people have what I call a backwards laddar. Instead of starting at the bottom rung (coach) and then working their way up, they go strait to the top rung. Backwards laddar.

Just about every single game in sports that is or ever has been played leaves half of the fans scratching their heads after the game. The team that loses never seems to figure out how it could have happened.

This kid...and the parents of this kid... should be forced to do a minimum of 1000 squat jumps per day. For life. Just for making this entire deal utterly ridiculous.

The problem is the refusal of realizing that a group of kids just may not be as good as originally thought...so fingers start being pointed.

I'm willing to bet that there's more to this than being said. Is it all "mandatory" practice time? When I was in school several of us went to the school and worked out an hour before school. Coaches were there and helped but it wasn't a required time to be there. Same thing went for after school. If we stayed after on our own time then it didn't count against the UIL 8 hour limit. There's no way this coaching staff is forcing players to attend a scheduled practice for 4 hours per day. They know the rules. Coaches may figure out ways to get extra time here and there but not to this extreme. I don't know the situation but I'm betting there's more to it.

I didn’t mean it would be beneficial to actually play it. I meant it would do more for preparing...if that’s what they want. I personally think it wouldn’t actually be smart. I’ve seen schools schedule games for “preparation” and schools schedule games for “wins”. In the end I don’t think it matters about preparing. Winning does as much or more than preparation. So long as they aren’t blowout wins. its better to have your kids play competitively for 2 or 3 quarters then let them rest and backups get experience. In my opinion that’s better than having your starters endure a dogfight for an entire game in which they may or may not win.

Couldn't have said it better.

Maybe the kids aren't as good as you think they are. Or maybe the defense is doing good enough...I'm pretty sure 5-0 would be fine for anybody up to this point of the season.

As sad as it sounds.. Newton vs WOS would be more beneficial to each other (as far as game preparation) than most of the other schools the 2 of them usually play pre-season. And I mean sad that WOS may have to play a 3A school to get a competitive game.

Maybe Newton should have just kneeled 3 times and punted after...I don’t know. What score should they have stopped at? 16-8? Would that ensure nobody’s feelings got hurt? Telling or expecting backup players to not play hard because of the score is asinine.

I thought that there used to be a few different options for schools to count their enrollment. But now it’s current 8-12 enrollment as of the snapshot day. I don’t know the answer. But yes counting 9-11 seems like a viable option to me. I definitely think that counting an entire class of kids that will be gone next year is dumb. Especially when that count determines who the school will compete with...according to enrollment.

Nimrod? Lol. That’s a typical response of someone that refuses to admit they’re wrong. Nobody is saying that? “ My complaint is 14 flags vs 3 flags.” Am I reading or interpreting that wrong?

I think it’s hilarious when people assume that both teams in a particular game should have a similar number of penalties. I know there are missed calls in every game, on every level, and in every sport. But saying that because one team had a lot of penalties and the other had a few somehow shows that it isn’t fair....well...that’s kind of dumb. ”we had 10 holding calls so they should have 10 as well.” Yeah. That’s stupid

That’s more true than you know. I honestly think the outcome of a game is about 20% because of coaching. Or less. The rest is purely based on the talent of your team or the talent of the other team. Sorry. Pardon the bluntness but it has pretty much everything to do with the kids.

If the refs aren’t blamed...or if the coaches aren’t blamed...then the blame would fall on the kids. No possible way it could be the kids fault. That’s crazy talk. So to answer the original question. No.

Lol at the people blaming the coaches. Typical.