Jump to content

americasteam22

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    150

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

72 Excellent

See reputation activity

Recent Profile Visitors

5,601 profile views
  1.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: FINAL — Livingston 13 at Little Cypress-Mauriceville 42 — Discussion
  2. americasteam22
    99 did not play 1 down again Huffman. Also 22 did not play. Both help defense tremendously.
  3.    americasteam22 reacted to a post in a topic: FINAL — Little Cypress-Mauriceville 0 at Hamshire-Fannett 25 — Discussion
  4.    BigWillie2003 reacted to a post in a topic: Enrollment Figures Released
  5. americasteam22
    BC had a good year, no one is saying they didn’t. But the facts are that they ran from WOS, Silsbee, and HF. If travel was the reason they gave to UIL then they lied to them. Also they lost to the same team that Beat LCM in the playoffs. And LCM beat BC. Maybe they won’t run from the district they are supposed to play in again. If BC gets put in 4a D11 again they will be biggest in their district. Should be able to beat those other teams since they are such a powerhouse and have more kids.
  6.    setxathlete14 reacted to a post in a topic: Bridge City (22) @ Huffman (21) - FINAL
  7.    bulldog16 reacted to a post in a topic: Bridge City (22) @ Huffman (21) - FINAL
  8.    americasteam22 reacted to a post in a topic: Bridge City (22) @ Huffman (21) - FINAL
  9.    RaiderGirl22 reacted to a post in a topic: Bridge City (22) @ Huffman (21) - FINAL
  10. americasteam22
    Honestly just stating facts, and fun banter like we let continue for days on the scandal topic created.
  11. americasteam22
    I think so it’s been so long I can’t remember
  12. americasteam22
    I heard BC got scared of that long distance travel WOS, HF, and Silsbee
  13.    BBfan061 reacted to a post in a topic: Bridge City (22) @ Huffman (21) - FINAL
  14.    gogo173489 reacted to a post in a topic: Bridge City (22) @ Huffman (21) - FINAL
  15. americasteam22
    It’s a CO DC, unless BC doesn’t recognize those rules either. They go in 1st seed. Co Champs make sure to put that on your banner and shirts!
  16. americasteam22
    Yeah I agree, with 1st part of that. I’m sure UIL will get plenty calls about BC running from competition.
  17. americasteam22
    Well before you decide to have last statement and close topics before they’re done I better get mine in. The fact they’re larger should encourage them stay and play the teams the UIL has set the numbers for, but we know why they want to move up. Not travel lol. We’ll see how the honesty of BC prevails to the UIL on Feb 1 this coming year.
  18. americasteam22
    BC has a good team this year, congrats. Not though good enough to beat LCM. BC says LCM cheated but BC tells UIL about travel reasons to move up Division. BC runs from Competition they should be playing.
  19. americasteam22
    Your team last realignment had about 50 kids less than LCM . My gosh yall are so small. This might be the first time in History.
  20.    gottalovefootball reacted to a post in a topic: Bridge City (22) @ Huffman (21) - FINAL
  21. americasteam22
    Great job BC on DC! Great job LCM for Beating the DC!
  22. americasteam22
    Not Bragging facts buddy
  23. americasteam22
    Just like we handled BC
  24. americasteam22
    No competitive disadvantage found. Straight from the UIL. so LCM wins because their better I hope after all evidence given and UIl decision that people respect the UIL
  25.    JackofAll reacted to a post in a topic: BC/LCM watch scandal?
  26. americasteam22
    Well maybe LCM loses tomorrow and BC wins then people will say we did it even though LCM cheated. Maybe T shirts can be made. No matter how far BC goes this year or if they win a DC, they know who owns them in Football!!!!! LCM
×
×
  • Create New...