OlDawg

That was BD’s video. I just replied with it attached. Interesting video.

The real question that needs to be answered is—as much conspiracy theory as there is running around in this thread—“How many of y’all have actually been abducted, anal probed, and were they really green with big eyes?” Just want to know what to look out for…asking for a friend.

Even Trump can’t force a judge to unseal records. He and/or DOJ can only make the request. It’s solely up to the judge.

You two have been talking past each other and playing ‘gotcha’ for awhile. It’s been fun to watch. You are —obviously—anti anything Trump, and BD is your opposite. I’m not a fan of many politicians—period. But, I do like what Rand Paul & Dan Crenshaw have to say more than most, and Kennedy from Louisiana always gives me a chuckle.

Wish I’d seen this before my last post above. But, it does follow my earlier thoughts I posted about the judges involved having records sealed. Approval would have to be given to unseal. Sounds more and more like Trump over promised and under delivered as has been the case a lot, and Bondi spoke without thinking.

I don’t know everything many of y’all do about this case because it wasn’t a primary issue affecting how our government operates, it didn’t affect national security, the economy, or immigration. But, Trump has continuously used The Deep State narrative to his advantage. This may be another time where he did, spoke in his normal overly bravado ‘tough guy’ talk, and it’s come back to bite him in the butt. Bondi—in an effort to suck up & caught up in the moment—also went overboard on her narrative. Not sure all these supposed names were ever collected except for specific cases like Prince Andrew. They apparently weren’t needed for the cases against Epstein and Maxwell. Should this be pursued? I guess so. IF the minors involved want to press any charges against the estate of Epstein. Just my thoughts.

Double post

Agree that the Biden Administration would’ve released info. Wasn’t aware Trump banned him at all. Haven’t kept up. Like I said, it reminds me of the release of the Kennedy files, or Geraldo opening Capone’s safe.

So, if it won’t be released, what’s all your railing about? If someone visited the island, that’s not a crime. It would only be a crime if they knowingly concealed knowledge of a crime being committed, or if they participated. You could question their judgement about associations. But—to me—rich folks are weird by default.

If they are found guilty of a crime, I agree. Are any crimes being pursued? My understanding is DOJ said ‘no.’ Something had to be there to convict Epstein in the first place. Maybe not. Maybe there was other evidence. But, specific names, dates, etc. would have to have been included I would think. The presiding judge blocked the release of info for some reason. Wouldn’t that judge have some input on the release?

They could get them to testify via telecommunications. Judges do it all the time. It’s become the norm. Last big jury I was on was a trial about multiple murders between Cripps & Bloods. Telecommunications were used for safety reasons.

Wrong again. I’m not denying anything. I’m not even a Trump voter. Just confused on where this is all supposed to go.

Have the young ladies/boys (for all I know) come forward to press charges? That would seem to be the appropriate thing to do, right? I really don’t know all the details of this specific issue. It just seems like a OJ Simpson type deal with slimier activities involved. Without making small of the activities, it seems like a National Enquirer type story.

Gotti had other issues.

Then, they need better lawyers. You’re reaching. Please post the details on the 3 people. I’d be interested to read.

Conspiracy is a ’willful’ crime. Just being somewhere isn’t conspiracy.

False.

This hasn’t been a big issue on my mind. So, I’m not ‘up-to-speed’ on everything.

So, someone is mentioned in the files. What then? Again…What are your expectations?

Why are you so invested in this? Do you actually think anything would come of it if the files were released? Exactly what are your expectations?

Don’t know. Don’t care. But, he’d have every right to sue. I wouldn’t doubt a motion to censor as well. For whatever good that does… While this is all nasty business, it has nothing to do with running the country.

He’ll be suing her over that one.

Beyoncé, Rihanna, Megan Thee Stallion, Ciara, Cardi B… Pretty much any black, female artist with a hip hop/pop music video. Video ho’s/soft porn stars by your definition. Man! I could do this all day.

No idea. Never cared. But, according to your definition, most of the younger women I see out and about in the summertime are soft porn models--not to mention any at the beach, pool, or boating. I don't go to clubs any more, but--when I did--the women definitely fit the definition. I guess the women's intimates section at any store should be age/gender restricted because the entire section is soft porn? Have you ever put on make-up and dressed up sexy for a date? Welcome to soft porn by your own definition. Your whole point would have been to arouse, tease, and entice. Unless you've walked around in a burka all day every day of your life, you've probably been a soft porn model at least once. To say otherwise would be a bald-faced lie. Be careful of the judgements you make. As someone who has posted religious thoughts, remember that your Maker created you. It was also intended that you mate. The human body isn't a dirty subject. Only Americans who've never really been anywhere else think that. American women are the most judgmental people I've ever met. Especially about other women.

Welp… There went the Sistine Chapel… Was there in ‘81. Amazing place & I’m not even Catholic. Shame all those nudes are painted on the ceiling. In a church at that. The horror!