OlDawg

Yes. While LEO's operate under fairly static rules, the threats to them are as real as they were to me. The only difference is that my conduct under DOD was regulated differently on each assignment by mission specific Rules of Engagement. So, no interdiction was ever exactly the same from a legal standpoint.

Now we know why Maduro was snatched and brought to the U.S. We needed to have someone with election integrity relook at and monitor our elections.

I think you meant her Super hijab. 😁🧕 The only woman I’ve ever seen that looked good in a hijab was Catherine Bell. Sorry…I digress…

Policy driven = CYA While they may need to refine some policies, I hope they don’t allow the mob to think they can dictate—through illegal actions—policy. I think that would be a major mistake for everyone in the future about any number of issues.

If Mayorkas was able to keep his job while allowing millions of illegals in, I’m not sure why Noem should be impeached for a split second decision made by an officer under duress. To me, it sounds like they’re more worried about collective bargaining rights than the death of their member.

Penalties for Illegally Entering Mexico [Hidden Content]

Reading and understanding are two different things. Understanding can be easily blocked by bias.

Very good read. Makes sense to me, and I actually took the time to look up his referenced cases. Thanks for sharing! I bookmarked his page & gave e-mail for the freebie. Good stuff.

I think this has been a very good discussion about the law. We’ve tried to apply what we know of case law to the current information we have on the tragedy that I think NONE OF US wish had happened. Nothing wrong with a little speculation/scenarios/debate based on news reporting. Otherwise, we’d all just sit around—without a care in the world—and wait for someone to tell us what was right or wrong without ever engaging our own brains. That’s not me. I LIKE using my brain, and trying to understand. Whether I agree or not really isn’t the issue. To me, this discussion has more information that’s relevant in the last 2 or 3 pages than probably 95%+ of the public will ever get.

If they have an existing bond—which many have stair stepped bonds—the length of repayment is just extended. So, it’s kind of a play on wording. Technically, the taxes aren’t increased. The length of time until repayment and taxes could drop because of no bond is extended.

Don’t use @DCT gingko biloba to try to help. It just makes you talk to yourself. 😂 😉 Now, I need to go to Walmart Vision Center and get my progressives adjusted before my teeth fall out…

I believe I’ve read where 4 agents still had their body cams on.

Haven’t seen anything on that yet. It was merely a question based on other reporting. If a big deal was made about him being on medication for a rib injury, they probably weren’t talking about Tylenol.

According to the preliminary investigative report, he was in the street, impeding LEO’s, and refused to move. In other words, committing a felony. Does that in itself justify shooting? I’d say a definite ‘No.’ As far as my comment on possible medication for a purported rib injury, that’s all the more reason to not be carrying at the time. Another failure in judgement. Wouldn’t you agree? Carrying a loaded firearm if he was on opioids? If he was on opioids, (not saying he was) he shouldn’t even have been driving. So, how did he get to the scene to interfere?

As an ICU nurse who supposedly was given medication for his ribs, I wonder if he was on oxycodone? Hadn’t thought of that… That would definitely impair his judgement.