OlDawg

Have for decades. No change here. Why do you think I want limited government? Every time I hear someone say they want the government to do something, I cringe. Remember Reagan’s Nine Scariest Words.

Gary Johnson got 4.5 million votes (3.3%) in 2016, even though he wasn't given security information or even a chance to debate. He wasn't perfect by any means, and I didn't agree with some of the Libertarian Party platform at the time. I still don't. But, I voted for him because I felt he was a better fit for my personal priorities than Clinton (I was an ABC--Anyone But Clinton--voter because of the Benghazi similarity) or Trump. Of course, I also supported Ron Paul and Ross Perot. I had high hopes for Mitt Romney. He was caught on a hot mike telling the truth, and got burned. He still--IMHO--would have been an excellent POTUS. The current primary system is giving us horrible candidates.

I can't say I blame you. I spent many years doing many things for this government of ours. It left me hanging out on my own on more than one occasion. I chose not to vote. You bringing up Benghazi hit close to home for me for a somewhat similar situation in the 80's. There was plenty of denial then as well. Now, I champion personal liberty and fiscal sanity. I'm not receiving either, and neither is anyone else. Regardless of Party. But, I can still hope. Maybe, there's still a chance we can get our government back to what was intended.

I'm comparing campaign promises. Can the redaction be proven to be a willful crime? I'm not disagreeing with your anger, nor am I condoning the behavior.

Sorry. I don’t see any EVIDENCE OF PEDOPHILIA in Massie’s questioning here… Ineptness. Sure. Cover-up? Not proven yet. Pretty high bar to convict someone for this crime, and most of what I’ve seen and read involves some doubt. This isn’t a civil case. There can be NO REASONABLE DOUBT. Seems to me this is more of a shaming to hope people are ostracized by their peers and the public type situation until/unless I see a lot more. By the time this is all said and done, any criminal case that could have been prosecuted will be corrupted by the coverage. I’m a little surprised someone as intelligent as you appear would partially condition your vote on the campaign promise of the release of information that’s almost two decades old when so much else was at stake. It’s almost like voting for Trump because he promised to release info on UFO’s. No offense meant.

I can understand someone saying the Feds shouldn't be requiring anything to be able to vote. I can understand them saying it should be left up to each State. That--to me--is a valid argument. The argument of requiring an ID to vote is a hardship has been disproven over and over through the years via voter turnout. The Parties have modified their voter turnout operations to compensate. They educate their voters and make sure they have what they need to vote.

I can’t count on both hands how many times I’ve been at a polling location waiting in line, seen a bus pull up and many folks who were down on their luck exit, get their paperwork to vote from the driver or their helper, and say they’ll get fed after they get done voting. I’m not sure who they were voting for…(/sarcasm)

Voter participation has increased since 2000 regardless of ID requirements. The argument that requiring an ID to vote is restrictive is bogus. [Hidden Content]

Maybe a newsflash to some, but the Constitution doesn’t guarantee the right to vote for President. In fact, if a State decided they didn’t want to vote for the Office of the President position, SCOTUS would have to turn itself into pretzels to make them. The Constitution and other Amendments and rulings only guarantee that if one person in the state is allowed, all must be equally allowed within rules set by the State. As a libertarian, I’m not against photo ID for voting. I think it’s pretty common sense. But, if required, the burden should be on the State to provide a uniform, acceptable form of ID. The burden shouldn’t be on the individual. Texas offers a free EIC card for voting. They even have mobile units for folks that might have transportation issues. I don’t know about all the other States. Of course, as I mentioned to @baddog, if the voting machines/tabulators/officials have integrity issues, photo ID’s are kind of a moot point.

Reason is a solid news and opinion magazine. Very trustworthy source. But, it will equally offend Dems and Reps on occasion. It’s a Libertarian publication that’s been around a long time. I recommend more people read it for a different viewpoint.

Looks like a reunion of the 2008-2011 rivalry. Roberts was a PAM player, and Berneathy was LP’s OL coach. Is Morgan retiring voluntarily?

Peyton Smith's offers have increased since I last checked. Congrats young man. [Hidden Content] Sean Simon has a couple new offers. [Hidden Content] Ryker Reynolds [Hidden Content] Caden Watson [Hidden Content]

Looks like they’re trying to get a new stadium also. Kudos to them. They need one. Renderings look nice. Sounds like they’re doing similar to La Porte. Demo & build new on same land with 8500 seating. La Porte holds a little more with film deck and observation deck on the Legacy Building. But, stated seating is the same.

Haven’t seen listed yet, but it looks like Lufkin has: Week 1 - Longview Week 2 - Nacadoches Both say at Abe. Looks like Lufkin’s first 4 games are at Abe.

Personally, I think y'all are all too invested in this, and the ending you get will never satisfy.