-
Posts
2,941 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
33
OlDawg last won the day on February 17
OlDawg had the most liked content!
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
La Porte
-
Interests
Grandkids, Fishing, Football, Baseball.
Recent Profile Visitors
-
Separation Scientist reacted to a post in a topic:
Out of Coverage Area: La Porte vs Austin Anderson, Round 3
-
thetragichippy reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
thetragichippy reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
OlDawg reacted to a post in a topic:
Barbers Hill vs. Pflugerville Weiss 3rd round
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Cuomo has no clue yet. He’s judging based on the wrong criteria & way too soon. The goal of tariffs was to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. That won’t happen overnight. While I may not be a fan, it’s too soon to know if they’re successful at the core goal yet. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
I believe tariffs have only brought in about 1% of the national debt. That’s before some will probably be refunded. It would have been much better to cut spending from a fiscal standpoint. Of course, we know that’ll never happen. Neither Party will cut. I am still hopeful some needed items can be re-onshored. That—to me—was the actual goal. It’s still up in the air, and possibly won’t be known for a few years. It’s critical to bring back some pharma & semiconductors. (Even though I dislike the government buying stakes in private firms like they have done under this administration.) I am against the nationalization of industries from a competition aspect, and a socialistic approach in private enterprise. This shouldn’t be a government function other than to provide incentives—not ownership. GM still owes us around $14 billion. I’m not sure who is really running the fiscal show from the Administration. But, I’ve always questioned some of the moves as a private enterprise/free trader. Yes, there have been some successes. There’s also been a lot of turmoil. -
LumRaiderFan reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
I wouldn’t disagree with your take. I’d debate you on your second sentence is all. I think the lockdowns did affect not only the manufacturing of goods, but also the logistics of supply. We both agree the $1.9 Trillion wasn’t needed & actually hurt. It actually accomplished nothing of note. When the Feds kept raising rates, and the extra money people received ran out, they had to pull back some. That helped cool inflation as well. -
AggiesAreWe reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
DCT reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
No. You don’t appear to see. The 9% was artificially inflated. The Feds raising the interest rates lowered the inflation rate more than anything the Biden Administration did. Somewhat similar to Trump. This Administration has hurt inflation coming down more due to tariff policy. The Feds maintaining a higher interest rate than needed are also affecting the slower pace of disinflation. The Fed is slowing down the drop on purpose. They want to ease into 2%. Not crash. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that if the Fed target is 2%, that 1/2% is a major change one way or other when not artificially inflated. If core inflation were to hit 3%, the Fed would immediately raise 50 basis points. That’s how big a 1/2% change is when the rate is close to target. -
TheMissingBand reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
That’s actually what he sounded like to me. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Not a fan. As I said, this needs to stop. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
We could quibble all day and never come to a definite conclusion. Adding $1.9 Trillion free cash flow caused the Fed to have to raise interest rates significantly. This helped fuel inflation. Yes, the other factors you mention played a role as well. Numbers I've seen credit the IRA with raising inflation by 30-40%, with the other factors contributing the rest. So, the so-called Inflation Reduction Act actually increased inflation by around 3-3.5% in the short term. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Half a point is historically a significant drop. It just doesn't seem like much compared to the high of 9%. I made nothing up. You need to study history more. -
LumRaiderFan reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Gonna be a good weekend to smoke a brisket for sure. I usually buy 2 when they go on sale around Memorial Day. Smoke one & freeze the other for later. We like smoking a brisket for Christmas if our kids/grandkids are coming down. -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Can of no salt added Starkist in water, tbsp. of mayo, tbsp. of dill relish on a low carb tortilla. Add an apple I split with my better 1/2. 40 grams of protein, 20 grams of fiber, only 200 mg of sodium, and a bunch of vitamins. It’s a fancy lunch called a tuna wrap. Cost: About $2.75 😉 -
OlDawg reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
LumRaiderFan reacted to a post in a topic:
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
Man! Where the heck are y’all buying groceries? KROGER: Choice Boneless Beef Brisket Untrimmed Whole in Bag (Limit 1 at Sale Price) $3.99/lb. I never pay full price even before inflation. Pork Butt was $.99/lb. last week. I’m smoking it tomorrow, vacuum packing what we don’t eat for stuffed spuds, brisket enchiladas, & barbacoa tacos. We gat about 4 different meals for about $12.00 total for the main course. 😀 -
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
It’s not a punishment to say you ‘might be inclined to keep someone out’ that didn’t want to invest there in the first place. Exxon has been around a lot longer than Trump. They’ll be here long after he’s gone. -
thetragichippy reacted to a post in a topic:
New York is circling the drain
-
Welp...That didn't take long. NYC residents say Mamdani reneging on affordable housing promise with proposed property tax hike [Hidden Content]
-
SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs
OlDawg replied to OlDawg's topic in Political Forum
No he didn’t. He offered incentives for investing—not punishment. Now, you’re just making stuff up to fit a narrative. Also, remember what I said about good policy vs. bad policy. The previous Administration’s policies stunk. It showed up immediately with over 9% inflation. Unreal. The current Administration has lowered that inflation number down significantly to a manageable rate. Question is, with the new policy fluctuations again, will they begin creeping up, or will they maintain a 2.4-2.6? The new Fed Chair will have a bearing since the benchmark interest rate should be around 3.5 right now at the high end. Either way, we need stability for investments. Promises are good. Actual tangible infrastructure investments are better. The deregulation will play a big part moving forward.