-
Posts
83,963 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
529
Everything posted by AggiesAreWe
-
Ags already down 4 DB's. Two suspended and now two ejected for targeting. Last one was the leader of the defense.
-
Crosby, Jasper, WO-S, LC-M and Hull-Daisetta disappointed me this week. Oh well. Plenty of season left. Just need to finish top 5 again. (but would like to win it for the 4th time)
-
Silsbee (49) @ Brazosport (20) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
Listened to the post game wrap up on my drive back from Winnie. Brazosport actually out gained Silsbee offensively. Had around 430 yards of offense to Silsbee's 350. Miller had 268 yards of all purpose yards (rushing, receiving, returns). Scored 4 TD's -
Crosby (27) @ Barbers Hill (28) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
You won't be far from me. Going to pm you my cell # -
Crosby (27) @ Barbers Hill (28) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
What barrel will you be parked at? I'll come visit. I live here in Caplan now. -
Crosby (27) @ Barbers Hill (28) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
You fishing on the peninsula this weekend? -
West Orange-Stark (21) @ Newton (24) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
Just a friendly reminder: Site rule: 18 ) The bashing of any particular coach, player, referee, etc will not be tolerated. This includes issues involving their personal lives, coaching/playing style or performance, past experiences, etc. It's starting to be an issue. Let's slow the roll please. -
Just a friendly reminder: Site rule: 18 ) The bashing of any particular coach, player, referee, etc will not be tolerated. This includes issues involving their personal lives, coaching/playing style or performance, past experiences, etc. It's starting to be an issue. Let's slow the roll please.
-
Silsbee (49) @ Brazosport (20) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
Last time Silsbee went 4-0 was 2011. Started that season 6-0. In 2004, Silsbee went 9-0 in regular season then lost in the first round to Palestine. -
Anahuac (55) @ San Augustine (20) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:55/20/f -
West Orange-Stark (21) @ Newton (24) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
2018 -
La Porte (27) @ Baytown Lee (20) FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:27/20/f -
!!:14/51/4Q
-
Bridge City (7) @ Lumberton (56) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
wrong score. should be reversed -
!!:75/6/3
-
Bridge City (7) @ Lumberton (56) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
!!:0/35/h -
Crosby leads the all time series with Barbers Hill 29-25-3. Not 12-4. 12-4 is only from 2007.
-
Spring Westfield (25) @ Galena Park North Shore (55) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
I believe we will never see Beaumont go to one high school. Too much pride. Also, some assistant coaches would be losing their jobs. That won't fly too well with some. -
Texan live slacking on local broadcasts!
AggiesAreWe replied to setxathlete14's topic in High School Football
Correct. TL isn't able to do every playoff game but they do have the rights and schools have to get permission from UIL and TL. -
Texan live slacking on local broadcasts!
AggiesAreWe replied to setxathlete14's topic in High School Football
The game was done because TL has a contract with Silsbee. Vidor just happened to be the opponent. Game was supposed to be a home game for Silsbee. TL has done every Silsbee game so far this season. -
Texan live slacking on local broadcasts!
AggiesAreWe replied to setxathlete14's topic in High School Football
According to UIL, a broadcast entity has to have permission from both schools to broadcast that game. If a school has sold their video broadcast rights to an outside entity, that entity reserves the right to allow or disallow another video broadcast at that home school's stadium. Sometimes it's mainly about having enough space in a press box for two video broadcasts. Other times it's about $$$. If one entity has the rights and they charge to watch their broadcast, it's highly unlikely that they would allow a free video broadcast to do that same game at the home stadium. In Anahuac's case (and others similar) who have their own video production, they can deny another schools video broadcast at Anahuac's home stadium. They have the video rights. Just remember, if a school denies another school broadcast access, expect the same to be done to you when you go to their stadium. This is only for regular season games. All playoff games are under Texan Live video rights. -
-
Texan live slacking on local broadcasts!
AggiesAreWe replied to setxathlete14's topic in High School Football
Texan Live isn't big enough to buy that many. Don't forget, they pay UIL for all the playoff games. Some schools turn down TL because they have their own video production. TL also doesn't solicit every local school. It's about viewership and potential sponsorship for those broadcasts. -
Texan live slacking on local broadcasts!
AggiesAreWe replied to setxathlete14's topic in High School Football
From my understanding no Orange County school has a contract with TL. As for the PN-G/WO-S game, I believe the lack of facility (press box under construction) was why that game was not on TL.