Jump to content

Fortheloveofthegame

Members
  • Posts

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fortheloveofthegame

  1. For Vidor: 1st Team: Carlie Abbott - Sr. Madison Perkins - Junior 2nd Team: Kenya Corriea - Soph. Madison Jones - Sr. Honorable Mention: Natalia Morrison - Sr. Mallory Guilott - Sr.
  2. Vidor lost to Splendora in 3 (25-20, 25-15, 25-23)
  3. and from what we (Vidor) are being told, our game location Friday will be decided by a coin toss after the game Thursday night.
  4. Vidor over Jasper in 3 (25-11, 25-18, 25-8)
  5. Lady Pirates with the win over Lumberton in 3!
  6. We (Vidor) play Lumberton this Friday. We beat them the first time and they met up in the first half of district. Hopefully we beat them again.
  7. I believe you are correct. I personally noticed 2 that played against us last night with Varsity then went on to play with JV. Now, it’s possible said players didn’t play at all Tuesday but I doubt it.
  8. Yes and yes... lol My kid plays on said team, and I honestly do not know what "team" showed up to Silsbee last Friday. It was awful. Last night we won 3-2. When we met LCM a few weeks ago, we went five with them and they ended up beating us 15-13 in the fifth set. When we played BC that went to five sets also, and we play BC at home again this Friday. Our Varsity is full of Seniors, we only have two girls that are underclassmen. Most of our girls are Varsity returners and there is no reason we should be losing close games and/or losing to teams we should not be losing to.
  9. Maxpreps now shows Bridge City to be 7-1 with a loss to Lumberton on 9/22 (FF). Looks like UIL did get involved.
  10. I'm not sure of the exact details, but it was a District game, not tournament play. I'm not sure if she played on JV then Varsity the same day, or if she played on JV then Varsity on the same day then played again in the same week.
  11. Supposedly a girl played consecutively with JV and Varsity.
  12. I came here wondering the same..... Supposedly a girl played consecutively with both JV and Varsity.
  13. Vidor over Lumberton in 5. (25-15, 17-25, 25-18 (can’t remember 4th but it was Lumberton) 15-9)
  14. It was very close to happening. Overall we killed ourselves on simple mistakes that should not be happening.
  15. Honestly, that’s what I would’ve assumed would happen is a replay gets called. One of those situations though it should’ve never even came down to 5 sets nor should it have came down to a position of one call possibly altering the game.
  16. I agree there..... suppose my point here is it is a penalty/call against you in any other sport. I would think it would be in volleyball as well. Oh well though. Water under the bridge at this point.
  17. Yes, and I would go out on a limb and say it will probably go to UIL. The ball was never dead. The whistle was never blown. More than six people were on the court when a player hit the ball that was still in play. I would think as soon as a player off the bench crosses the line and steps on the court, the play is immediately ruled dead and a replay happens, or the team with more than six on the court loses that point and it goes to the other team.
  18. LCM beat Vidor 3-2. Anybody know the rule on an entire team storming the court DURING play? During the 5th set, it was Vidor 12 LCM 13. LCM players assumed the ball was dead but our kids dug it out of the net and hit it back over. LCM's entire bench stormed the court to celebrate, then realized "oh crap they're still going" and ran off the court. Refs never called it. Point ended up going to LCM which was a game altering point. Our coaches never realized this had happened as they were watching the play and the ball coming back over the net. Football - penalty would be enforced. Soccer - it constitutes a forfeit. I would think that point should have went to Vidor which would have made it 13 all.
  19. Vidor won first with a win over West Brook. Their only loss was their first set that Thursday morning which so happened to be against West Brook also.
×
×
  • Create New...