All Activity

It’s obvious the DOJ is suppressing truthful information and not investigating powerful elites from what I’ve seen over the years. Our government is broken. I’ll just leave it at that. Pretty disgusted at this point. The judiciary hearing the other day was a dumpster fire with Pam Bondi. What a embarrassment.

I'm comparing campaign promises. Can the redaction be proven to be a willful crime? I'm not disagreeing with your anger, nor am I condoning the behavior.

More than three million pages from the Epstein files are now public. Cannibalism. Rape. Murder. Pedophilia. They investigated and raided a literal squirrel before a single person on the Epstein client list.

Offense was taken, they literally redacted a co conspirator to Epstein which is against the law that Trump signed into law. Thats just what he found in the little research of a hour or two looking at the millions of unredacted files. You’re comparing exposing UFO information to information on powerful people Child Sex Trafficking kids? Pretty disappointed in your verbiage Dawg. Have you even looked at any of the documents? My vote was predicated on ACCOUNTABILITY! Russia Hoax , J6 , Covid BS, Epstein Perpetrators, DOGE FINDINGS, 2020 ELECTION FRAUD, etc. At this point ZERO ARREST OF ANYONE INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE AND MORE! Pretty Sad.

This video speaks volumes.

It’s a shame you have to explain that, but no surprise.

Sorry. I don’t see any EVIDENCE OF PEDOPHILIA in Massie’s questioning here… Ineptness. Sure. Cover-up? Not proven yet. Pretty high bar to convict someone for this crime, and most of what I’ve seen and read involves some doubt. This isn’t a civil case. There can be NO REASONABLE DOUBT. Seems to me this is more of a shaming to hope people are ostracized by their peers and the public type situation until/unless I see a lot more. By the time this is all said and done, any criminal case that could have been prosecuted will be corrupted by the coverage. I’m a little surprised someone as intelligent as you appear would partially condition your vote on the campaign promise of the release of information that’s almost two decades old when so much else was at stake. It’s almost like voting for Trump because he promised to release info on UFO’s. No offense meant.

Let’s see…. Pam Bondi February 2025: "The files are on my desk" July 2025: "There are no files, everything's already been released" October 2025: "Oops we just found 5 million files" Watch this little video clip. Here’s one of a few names he found in just 2 hours of looking at the unredacted files.

This info was reported by David Khait not Lara Logan.

You’ve pretty well demonstrated that you don’t know much about election laws. Georgia law may allow homeless people to use shelter addresses for the purpose of registering to vote. My point is, no one knows except people familiar with Georgia laws. Why do you give this kind of tripe air?

The same Lara Logan who got fired from CBS for using an inaccurate source? Now her main platform is X? Real reliable.

Illegally registered? An empty lot by itself means nothing.

I can understand someone saying the Feds shouldn't be requiring anything to be able to vote. I can understand them saying it should be left up to each State. That--to me--is a valid argument. The argument of requiring an ID to vote is a hardship has been disproven over and over through the years via voter turnout. The Parties have modified their voter turnout operations to compensate. They educate their voters and make sure they have what they need to vote.

@UT alum

It’s absolutely ridiculous, anyone with any sense knows exactly why democrats push back on ID.

WOW! Real difficult.! LOL! Are the Democrats, and some here, racist for saying that blacks do not have the intestinal fortitude and intelligence to know what to do if an ID is required to vote? BTW, 71% of blacks favor voter ID.

Like the border?

I can’t count on both hands how many times I’ve been at a polling location waiting in line, seen a bus pull up and many folks who were down on their luck exit, get their paperwork to vote from the driver or their helper, and say they’ll get fed after they get done voting. I’m not sure who they were voting for…(/sarcasm)

Unless the divorce decree says they must change their last name, a woman can still use her married last name. Dems can’t define a woman anyway. I think they’re worried about the men who think they’re women. They’re so confused, they shouldn’t vote anyway.

Apparently some women have the brains to complete all the paperwork to get married, but if they get a divorce they become stupid, and can’t figure out have to change their name back so they can vote……at least that is what several democrats claim

There has been examples of election fraud the last several years, but Democrats discount it as not significant….at the same time claiming every vote should count…. Banks eat fraud all the time…….and ask for id…..think about that in the votes…..what get ls missed?

I carry a photo ID everywhere I go. What’s the problem?

Voter participation has increased since 2000 regardless of ID requirements. The argument that requiring an ID to vote is restrictive is bogus. [Hidden Content]

Still no proof of fraud. Still no proof the system is rigged or corrupt. None. Zero, zip, nada. Like I say, the Republican Party loves to fix problems that don’t exist.

I’ll ask you like I did Reagan. Where is the evidence of election fraud? Where is the proof that any race anywhere anytime has been statistically altered because of fraud of ANY kind? Our election system is the safest in the world. Why take efforts to restrict voting when historically it has been made easier and more accessible to the citizenry? Because Trump is a natural born cheat.