Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. It's a real issue, and ties back into the birthright citizenship question before SCOTUS. Friedman succinctly stated--paraphrased--you can't have open borders and a welfare state. That's one of the reasons why I (as a conservative libertarian, for lack of a better definition) have always been against the Libertarian Party position of open borders unless we do away with the welfare state first. Which will never happen...
  3. I'm not going to go line-by-line through census data right now. But, SIPP (Census Bureau) numbers do show a majority of households receiving SNAP and/or WIC benefits are headed up by illegal immigrant 'heads of households' applying for their children. Of all immigrant-headed households (naturalized citizens and non-citizens) with young children, 43 percent are dependent on at least one of these programs. [Hidden Content]
  4. Yeah agree.. thats why I said no slap on the wrist. Accountability needs to be held even if being stupid
  5. With who the OP is and how things are portrayed these days im surprised it wasnt posted in Political.. if im being honest
  6. The effect on food and welfare support to the poor in the government shutdown has revealed that the noncitizen and illegal immigrant community has been benefiting from the taxpayer-funded programs more than American citizens — by far. [Hidden Content]
  7. Today
  8. Figures. Fictional characters may as well be where you get your info. It’s not disturbing because it is t true.
  9. Exactly right, even the National Enquirer scooped big stories, Rush Limbaugh, Tiger Woods and John Edwards. It’s easier to dismiss the source if you can’t dispute the information.
  10. Personally I don’t care if Elmer Fudd posted these statistics. If they are indeed true that’s very disturbing.
  11. Pretty sure that charges are already filed and included $50k bond.
  12. Mark me down as someone who is stating very clearly that they were mimicking the imagery of what is portrayed by artists on Death Row Records. You have also specifically stated that the kids were mimicking the imagery by shooting a “video with guns”. Like videos by artists on “Death Row Records”. NOT A SINGLE PERSON said anything about the shooting being INTENTIONAL.
  13. Surprised this thread is still open and not locked....... .....But then again.....
  14. I actually see 4 members that maybe are implying some kind of intent. 13 different members (not counting me) commented on this thread. I think for the most part folks know there was no intent. Pure reckless behavior which in some cases bring criminal charges. Kid was being stupid but like I said, that may not absolve him from some kind of fault and maybe a criminal charge. There has been many situations that have criminal negligence. I don't think any charges will be filed. Prayers for all that are involved.
  15. No one has said that this young man picked up a gun, shot through a wall, and intentionally shot the other young man. That’s simply your spin. The problem is….guns don’t go off by themselves. If no one is held accountable, then anyone can pick up a gun, shoot anyone they want, and simply say they were playing around and the gun accidentally went off…..which is impossible. Someone pulled a trigger. What if the young man died? What if it was your kid? You‘d sing a “different tune”.
  16. 6 members speaking more on "death row" and the gun than they have the victim
  17. Watching the Military Bowl. ECU fans seem excited as will others playing in bowl games. ECU just got screwed big time for an inadvertent whistle that called back a highlight reel TD on 4th and 1.
  18. From close ties to the situation, being stupid and filming a video with a loaded gun! Seems many on here want this to be a "on purpose" situation... offender is damn good to shoot through the wall and hit the neck of victim... C'mon man SMH
  19. Any chance of him moving up to the collegiate level in the future?
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...