Jump to content

Lamar to FBS is not dead despite the foolish decision by the WAC


Recommended Posts

One concern I have always had was going to the WAC and then having a conference shift then Lamar gets stuck out west alone.
Well the WAC cured that fear. Conference realignment is far from dead. We know

1. BE may take Houston to partner with TCU.
2. BE is going to take UCF to partner with USF.
Orlando, Houston, DFW market. They would have to be as stupid as the WAC to pass on those markets.

So that leaves CUSA at 10 schools.

The question becomes does UTEP want to stay in CUSA?  or does the MWC look more attractive. Keep in mind El Paso is closer to California than to Houston. MWC passed on SJSU and San Jose sits in a mega-market. So I wouldn't rule out USU and Utep getting the MWC invite. The MWC is waiting on the Big 12 to break up,not gonna happen. Maybe BYU will join the Big 12.

This still leaves CUSA with 10 or 9 members. Who will CUSA invite? I say at least 1 SBC. I do not know which SBC school. Maybe one of the Florida schools. I would put UNT, MTSU, and La Tech as last resort options.

We must keep and eye on ULM. This school is half Lamar size, in a poor state, in a small town, and a athletic budget smaller than FCS Lamar or any of the Texas SLC football schools. With budget cuts coming in 2012, do the math.

If SBC loses 2 schools, they are down to 8 football. 3 schools, they lose FBS status. So don't buy into that SBC won't add FCS schools. They will after the BE makes a move. Lamar could go SBC in 2013.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PAC 10/12 commissioner mentioned a week or two ago that he thinks there's a lot of alignment/expansion on the horizon in the next year or two.  The MWC may still end up taking Utah State and/or San Jose State.  The WAC needs to get to at least 8 football schools by 2014.  A lot of the BCS schools want more FBS teams so they can rack up more wins and get bowl eligible.

I've also read that the NCAA is unhappy that the FCS playoffs is a money loser.  There's really no incentive to force schools to stay at the FCS level if they want to move up and have the money.

Lamar now has an extra year or two to build up the football program and the whole athletic department before jumping to FBS.  The WAC is probably the way to go but one raid of the SBC will open up that conference too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="coachacola" post="1009238" timestamp="1305214871"]
The PAC 10/12 commissioner mentioned a week or two ago that he thinks there's a lot of alignment/expansion on the horizon in the next year or two.  The MWC may still end up taking Utah State and/or San Jose State.  The WAC needs to get to at least 8 football schools by 2014.  A lot of the BCS schools want more FBS teams so they can rack up more wins and get bowl eligible.
[/quote]This is what pissed me off. Comcast wants SJSU in the MWC and they just might make it in. They are on the way out but blocks Lamar from coming in.
[quote]
I've also read that the NCAA is unhappy that the FCS playoffs is a money loser.  There's really no incentive to force schools to stay at the FCS level if they want to move up and have the money.

Lamar now has an extra year or two to build up the football program and the whole athletic department before jumping to FBS.  The WAC is probably the way to go but one raid of the SBC will open up that conference too.
[/quote]Also the possibility of ending FBS/FCS and all schools play at 1 level.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="UNLV" post="1009240" timestamp="1305215030"]
[quote author=1KatKiller link=topic=84175.msg1009232#msg1009232 date=1305214158]
well, since you brought it up first...I'm hearing U of H to the big east.
[/quote]Me too. Hopefully before July 1st.
[/quote]

Actually that makes sense.  The UH fan base don't seem to care that much about the CUSA.  Big East teams would probably draw better in Houston than CUSA teams plus they'd re-unite with TCU.  If they join the Big East, UH should hire a big time basketball coach and play a lot of their games in the Toyota Center.  Like LU, they can't return their BB program back to the glory days.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • The problem as well as that all of the social justice warriors, influencers, and instigators repeat these lies in the immediate days after the event, garnering outrage.  But when they're proven false they never go back and rescind their outrage-causing posts, they just move on to the next one.
    • I just find it really hard to believe that Trump will select a VP based on the votes they bring him.  He's going to want a Trumper that will affirm his every move and stoke his ego.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I doubt it.  And as you said, in these battle ground states a few tenths of a % point may be enough to swing the whole election.  Trump can't afford a VP who will cost him votes (Noem would cost him full points, not just tenths), but also needs a candidate that will bring in as many votes as possible.  So hopefully whichever Trump disciple he chooses has some political appeal to swing voters.
    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...