Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Porter said:

😂

 

MAGA and bots 😂

Real conservatives and the rest of the world shaking their heads

I honestly feel bad for Reagan, biggest man crush on sleepy Donald that I've ever seen.. dude foams at the mouth daily to talk about him.. he/she has that defend by all means mantra lol

Posted
1 hour ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

MAGA and bots 😂

Real conservatives and the rest of the world shaking their heads

I honestly feel bad for Reagan, biggest man crush on sleepy Donald that I've ever seen.. dude foams at the mouth daily to talk about him.. he/she has that defend by all means mantra lol

And you’re the one who cried about personal attacks. That’s all you do. Smoaky would be proud. You’re just part of the hypocrite cult. Got it.

Posted

Still to early to decide if this effort was a success or failure. That won't be known until the formal agreement is signed at least a couple months from now. If there really are snap inspections and full access by IAEA, and IAEA supervises dilution of current material, it could be deemed successful from the nuclear threat aspect.

I also still say, the Strait--thus Iran--has lost it's bargaining power for the future. Supply chains will no longer rely so much on passage through the Strait for the bulk of their needs. This is an outcome that wasn't discussed as a goal. It's an unintended consequence. But, it's a definite positive for the U.S.

The Administration lucked out, and backed into this one.

Posted
5 hours ago, OlDawg said:

Still to early to decide if this effort was a success or failure. That won't be known until the formal agreement is signed at least a couple months from now. If there really are snap inspections and full access by IAEA, and IAEA supervises dilution of current material, it could be deemed successful from the nuclear threat aspect.

I also still say, the Strait--thus Iran--has lost it's bargaining power for the future. Supply chains will no longer rely so much on passage through the Strait for the bulk of their needs. This is an outcome that wasn't discussed as a goal. It's an unintended consequence. But, it's a definite positive for the U.S.

The Administration lucked out, and backed into this one.

No different then the Obama deal. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, DCT said:

No different then the Obama deal. 

Wrong. JCPOA didn't have snap inspections of any sites, or destruction of existing enriched nuclear material. In fact, it included terms that required giving notice to Iran about upcoming inspections, and even allowed them to self report enrichment.

JCPOA was a big, fat nothingburger. It's yet to be seen what this will turn into.

Posted
1 hour ago, OlDawg said:

Wrong. JCPOA didn't have snap inspections of any sites, or destruction of existing enriched nuclear material. In fact, it included terms that required giving notice to Iran about upcoming inspections, and even allowed them to self report enrichment.

JCPOA was a big, fat nothingburger. It's yet to be seen what this will turn into.

So are you saying this MOU is a better deal?

This is the hidden content, please

 

This is the hidden content, please

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,744
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    little red
    Newest Member
    little red
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...