Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
58 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

You are letting cardinalbacker show......

You are getting way too close to the personal attack line..........The IQ comments  are unnecessary. You are already on thin ice and should know that since you seem to brag about how smart you are,,,,,,

I’m sorry… I’ve been using ChatGPT for my responses and I guess I forgot to proof that one.  
 

I ask it to make me sound like CB, and to not be overtly insulting. I guess it’s kinda working. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Reagan said:

It's tough to vote illegally in Texas because of voter ID.  We need to do an in-depth study of all of the blue States and see what we find.  Commielina Harris won States that doesn't have voter ID.  And what States are fighting voter ID?!

Which five states have a REAL ID that proves citizenship? An ID that’s better than the one in Texas that made it tougher to vote illegally and eliminated election fraud by non-citizens.

New York, Michigan, Minnesota, Vermont and Washington.  Which of those five states would you consider the reddest?

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
20 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

I’m sorry… I’ve been using ChatGPT for my responses and I guess I forgot to proof that one.  
 

I ask it to make me sound like CB, and to not be overtly insulting. I guess it’s kinda working. 

Comments like this is what wears your welcome out.

You and PDF have to walk a finer line. You don't have the luxury of skating by.

Posted
9 hours ago, TheMissingBand said:

Which five states have a REAL ID that proves citizenship? An ID that’s better than the one in Texas that made it tougher to vote illegally and eliminated election fraud by non-citizens.

New York, Michigan, Minnesota, Vermont and Washington.  Which of those five states would you consider the reddest?

This is the hidden content, please

New York, Minnesota, and Vermont may have fantastic enhanced Real ID’s. Problem is, they are also states that don’t require any ID to vote. So, I’m not sure what good they do for that purpose at this time.

Personally, I’m always curious about studies that say there’s no voter fraud when 14 States and the District of Columbia don’t even require ID to vote. Basically, almost 40% of the population is on the honor system.

I’m not a big conspiracy theorist. But, not sure someone can prove fraud or not if there’s no check. Should make anyone skeptical of the study.

This is the hidden content, please

 

Posted
58 minutes ago, OlDawg said:

I’m not a big conspiracy theorist. But, not sure someone can prove fraud or not if there’s no check. Should make anyone skeptical of the study.

They came up with the “no widespread fraud” phrase…… democrats seem to be OK with fraud as long as it’s not widespread

Posted
2 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

They came up with the “no widespread fraud” phrase…… democrats seem to be OK with fraud as long as it’s not widespread

To be honest, the republicans need a little bit of fraud to exist so they have something to blame the losses on. 

Posted
On 3/23/2026 at 2:43 PM, baddog said:

Two republicans lead the polls. In California, the top two run, no D vs. R. Maybe there’s hope. Last time Cal. was red, they had the top economy in the country, even world ranked. Now they are fleeing. 

Source please

Posted
On 3/24/2026 at 8:03 PM, TheMissingBand said:

To be honest, the republicans need a little bit of fraud to exist so they have something to blame the losses on. 

How do we know that Trump really won the 2024 election, if our process is not secure?

Posted
27 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Source please

This is true.  The way California elections are ran, the top two are in the general election.  As of now the top two are Republicans.  This can be looked up and verified.

Posted
1 hour ago, Big girl said:

Source please

"In the California governor’s race, two Republicans land at top of the state Democratic Party’s poll

The survey had Republicans Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco in the top two spots with Democrats Eric Swalwell, Katie Porter and Tom Steyer in virtual tie for third place" - Los Angeles Times 3/26/26

Posted
13 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

He did. 
 

Then he lost 50+ lawsuits trying to overturn the results based on fabricated claims of later fraud that were all debunked. 

Oops, what about this one?

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
2 minutes ago, baddog said:

Oops, what about this one?

This is the hidden content, please

Flynn did the crime. Flynn PLEADED GUILTY, admitting that he did it. Then Trump pardoned Flynn and approved a settlement to compensate Flynn.

 

Drain the swamp, huh? Every time Trump pardons a fraudster, the victims get knocked out of restitution. 
 

Do you even understand what you’re celebrating? There’s corruption going on in real time like this country has never seen. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

Flynn PLEADED GUILTY,

You do understand the negotiations that go on between the most powerful DOJ and a civilian, right? Plead guilty and we stop or plead innocent and we drain you of every dollar and asset you have while you try and protect yourself.  I'm sure you don't care to read all the emails being released about the lawfare the Biden justice dept did.... but it's not good. I guess you would only care if it affected you....maybe one day, who knows

Posted
25 minutes ago, baddog said:

Not what I read. That NYT link sucks. Here’s abetter one.

This is the hidden content, please

It says the same thing… that in 2017 (Trump was President) Flynn pled guilty of lying to the FBI about conversations that he had with Russians prior to Trump being elected. He was sentenced to prison. Trump pardoned Flynn in November  of 2020 just before leaving office…. Between losing the election and the insurrection at the Capitol, lol. He wasn’t too busy to pardon Flynn. 
 

Trump has now authorized a payout to Flynn. Before accepting a plea, the court always requires the defendant to admit guilt (he did) and verify that no one is forcing them to plead guilty (he did). 
 

To me, it looks like a reward to Flynn for keeping his mouth shut about Trump’s involvement with the Russians, but what do I know? The difference between 2020 and 2026 is that they used to be independent. In 2020 they were allowed to prosecute crimes that occurred. In 2026 they are simply Trump’s personal vengeance team… just ask Jerome Powell. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

You do understand the negotiations that go on between the most powerful DOJ and a civilian, right? Plead guilty and we stop or plead innocent and we drain you of every dollar and asset you have while you try and protect yourself.  I'm sure you don't care to read all the emails being released about the lawfare the Biden justice dept did.... but it's not good. I guess you would only care if it affected you....maybe one day, who knows

Read a little. He pleaded guilty when Trump was in office (2017) because he was guilty.

Posted
49 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said:

Flynn did the crime. Flynn PLEADED GUILTY, admitting that he did it. Then Trump pardoned Flynn and approved a settlement to compensate Flynn.

 

Drain the swamp, huh? Every time Trump pardons a fraudster, the victims get knocked out of restitution. 
 

Do you even understand what you’re celebrating? There’s corruption going on in real time like this country has never seen. 

What crime did Gen Flynn commit?  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Reagan said:

What crime did Gen Flynn commit?  

“Flynn acknowledged lying during the FBI interview by saying he had not discussed with the then-Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, sanctions that had just been imposed on Russia for election interference by the outgoing Obama administration. During that conversation, Flynn urged Kislyak for Russia to be "even-keeled" in response to the punitive measures, and assured him "we can have a better conversation" about relations between the two countries after Trump became president.

The conversation alarmed the FBI, which at the time was investigating whether the Trump campaign and Russia had coordinated to sway the election's outcome. In addition, White House officials were stating publicly that Flynn and Kislyak had not discussed sanctions.”

This is the hidden content, please


Long story made short is that the FBI was interviewing Flynn about having conversations with Russian reps prior to the 2016 election, which Flynn denied. It turns out that he had, in fact, been negotiating with the Russians on Trumps behalf prior to the 2016 election. That’s the charge to which he pleaded guilty.  

Kinda like when Martha Stewart went to prison for lying to investigators. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,727
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Lioness69
    Newest Member
    Lioness69
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...