Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

no paywall - a fairly long read, but it does include still frames from the videos we have and case law…..

if you want to hear an opinion from someone who has actually prosecuted use of force cases. 

@tvc184 - this may be right up your ally, 
 

 

This is the hidden content, please

That is a good article. 

He actually went into the incident and I tried to stick to the laws that I think apply to the situation. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

This is making that CNN story about his ribs seem a little more accurate

Just a passive and honorable VA nurse trying to help others.  

Posted
20 minutes ago, DCT said:

This is the hidden content, please

If Mayorkas was able to keep his job while allowing millions of illegals in, I’m not sure why Noem should be impeached for a split second decision made by an officer under duress.

To me, it sounds like they’re more worried about collective bargaining rights than the death of their member.

Posted
1 minute ago, OlDawg said:

If Mayorkas was able to keep his job while allowing millions of illegals in, I’m not sure why Noem should be impeached for a split second decision made by an officer under duress.

Like I stated earlier, the Federal Government is policy driven.  You break policy they will hang you out to dry,   Ten months until election is weighing heavy on those up for reelection. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, DCT said:

Like I stated earlier, the Federal Government is policy driven.  You break policy they will hang you out to dry,   Ten months until election is weighing heavy on those up for reelection. 

Policy driven = CYA

While they may need to refine some policies, I hope they don’t allow the mob to think they can dictate—through illegal actions—policy. I think that would be a major mistake for everyone in the future about any number of issues.

Posted
17 minutes ago, OlDawg said:

Policy driven = CYA

While they may need to refine some policies, I hope they don’t allow the mob to think they can dictate—through illegal actions—policy. I think that would be a major mistake for everyone in the future about any number of issues.

Federal officers are often protected by qualified immunity, shielding them from personal liability for damages unless they violate "clearly established" laws, policy or constitutional rights.

Posted
4 hours ago, DCT said:

Federal officers are often protected by qualified immunity, shielding them from personal liability for damages unless they violate "clearly established" laws, policy or constitutional rights.

Imagine that, if you didn’t violate the law then you can’t be personally sued. 

Posted
6 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Imagine that, if you didn’t violate the law then you can’t be personally sued. 

Big if at the end of the day.  If you violate the law the government will not protect you if it is outside the scope of your duties.  If you do violate  it can be costly.

Posted
11 hours ago, OlDawg said:

If Mayorkas was able to keep his job while allowing millions of illegals in, I’m not sure why Noem should be impeached for a split second decision made by an officer under duress.

To me, it sounds like they’re more worried about collective bargaining rights than the death of their member.

Under duress?

Posted

8 minute video explains it so simply, even a liberal could understand. I know it doesn’t fit the narrative, but it explains reality. For those living in Disneyland, you’re too far gone anyway….

 

Posted

Welp……

Homan made it clear they are not walking away from Minneapolis….Staying until the problem is gone.

They will draw down agents ONLY if there is cooperation from local police and jails….

He ALSO mentioned and supported Kristi Noem 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Imagine that, if you didn’t violate the law then you can’t be personally sued. 

In your opinion did the officers violate the law?  

Posted
50 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Under duress?

Yes. While LEO's operate under fairly static rules, the threats to them are as real as they were to me. The only difference is that my conduct under DOD was regulated differently on each assignment by mission specific Rules of Engagement. So, no interdiction was ever exactly the same from a legal standpoint.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,645
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    88Warrior
    Newest Member
    88Warrior
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...