thetragichippy Posted 15 hours ago Author Report Posted 15 hours ago 40 minutes ago, Porter said: Seems like a nice gentle nurse. This is making that CNN story about his ribs seem a little more accurate OlDawg 1 Quote
tvc184 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, thetragichippy said: no paywall - a fairly long read, but it does include still frames from the videos we have and case law….. if you want to hear an opinion from someone who has actually prosecuted use of force cases. @tvc184 - this may be right up your ally, This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up That is a good article. He actually went into the incident and I tried to stick to the laws that I think apply to the situation. Quote
tvc184 Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 25 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: This is making that CNN story about his ribs seem a little more accurate Just a passive and honorable VA nurse trying to help others. Quote
Porter Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 23 minutes ago, tvc184 said: Just a passive and honorable VA nurse trying to help others. Very compassionate Quote
DCT Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Blame game. Quote
thetragichippy Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago 36 minutes ago, DCT said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Blame game. So Quote
DCT Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: So This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 2 minutes ago, DCT said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up No lies there. Quote
DCT Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 16 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: So This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Gets interesting. Quote
OlDawg Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 20 minutes ago, DCT said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up If Mayorkas was able to keep his job while allowing millions of illegals in, I’m not sure why Noem should be impeached for a split second decision made by an officer under duress. To me, it sounds like they’re more worried about collective bargaining rights than the death of their member. Quote
DCT Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 1 minute ago, OlDawg said: If Mayorkas was able to keep his job while allowing millions of illegals in, I’m not sure why Noem should be impeached for a split second decision made by an officer under duress. Like I stated earlier, the Federal Government is policy driven. You break policy they will hang you out to dry, Ten months until election is weighing heavy on those up for reelection. Quote
OlDawg Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 4 minutes ago, DCT said: Like I stated earlier, the Federal Government is policy driven. You break policy they will hang you out to dry, Ten months until election is weighing heavy on those up for reelection. Policy driven = CYA While they may need to refine some policies, I hope they don’t allow the mob to think they can dictate—through illegal actions—policy. I think that would be a major mistake for everyone in the future about any number of issues. Quote
DCT Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 17 minutes ago, OlDawg said: Policy driven = CYA While they may need to refine some policies, I hope they don’t allow the mob to think they can dictate—through illegal actions—policy. I think that would be a major mistake for everyone in the future about any number of issues. Federal officers are often protected by qualified immunity, shielding them from personal liability for damages unless they violate "clearly established" laws, policy or constitutional rights. Quote
DCT Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 2 Border patrol agents placed on Administrative leave. Bavino was not being honest when he said the agents were still working in other states. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
tvc184 Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 4 hours ago, DCT said: Federal officers are often protected by qualified immunity, shielding them from personal liability for damages unless they violate "clearly established" laws, policy or constitutional rights. Imagine that, if you didn’t violate the law then you can’t be personally sued. thetragichippy 1 Quote
DCT Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, tvc184 said: Imagine that, if you didn’t violate the law then you can’t be personally sued. Big if at the end of the day. If you violate the law the government will not protect you if it is outside the scope of your duties. If you do violate it can be costly. Quote
Big girl Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, OlDawg said: If Mayorkas was able to keep his job while allowing millions of illegals in, I’m not sure why Noem should be impeached for a split second decision made by an officer under duress. To me, it sounds like they’re more worried about collective bargaining rights than the death of their member. Under duress? Quote
baddog Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 8 minute video explains it so simply, even a liberal could understand. I know it doesn’t fit the narrative, but it explains reality. For those living in Disneyland, you’re too far gone anyway…. OlDawg 1 Quote
thetragichippy Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago Welp…… Homan made it clear they are not walking away from Minneapolis….Staying until the problem is gone. They will draw down agents ONLY if there is cooperation from local police and jails…. He ALSO mentioned and supported Kristi Noem Quote
DCT Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, tvc184 said: Imagine that, if you didn’t violate the law then you can’t be personally sued. In your opinion did the officers violate the law? Quote
thetragichippy Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago CNN is trying to say there is a change in tone😂 There is no change in tone…if you are here illegally, you are gone! Quote
thetragichippy Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, DCT said: In your opinion did the officers violate the law? You should really read the link I posted. OlDawg 1 Quote
OlDawg Posted 44 minutes ago Report Posted 44 minutes ago 50 minutes ago, Big girl said: Under duress? Yes. While LEO's operate under fairly static rules, the threats to them are as real as they were to me. The only difference is that my conduct under DOD was regulated differently on each assignment by mission specific Rules of Engagement. So, no interdiction was ever exactly the same from a legal standpoint. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.