Silsbee (14) @ Beaumont West Brook (49) - FINAL

[AggiesAreWe]

14 yard TD pass for the Bruins

!!:14/49/4

 

2:04

You've alerted the ScoreboardBot:

Score Alert: Silsbee(14) @ Beaumont West Brook(49) Q4

[AggiesAreWe]

!!:14/49/F

You've alerted the ScoreboardBot:

Game Over Alert: FINAL - Silsbee(14) @ Beaumont West Brook(49)

[navydawg31]

Congrats WB! Had bruins winning tonight but not like this at all!

[82 5A State Champs]

Dang, for Silsbee being a two point favorite, WB proved the experts wrong. Nice win, Bruins!

[Yeoj]

24 minutes ago, 82 5A State Champs said:

The district theyre in is no slouch. Theyll have to upset at least one team to qualify. 

WB is the 3rd best team in that district behind Lufkin and PAM. The Bruins do have the great equalizer as headcoach. So we'll see how it plays out.

[NewtonNation]

1 hour ago, Tiger33 said:

Tell your coach to put Silsbee on yalls  pre-district schedule next year. Our Sub should be starting at QB, and we will see who can win the ball game. 

Newton is trying to fill non district, tell your Coach to accept. 

[Bread]

2 hours ago, wbfan said:

Did Langston change coordinators in the off-season?

Still the same guy. Works his butt off and is killing it! 

[BMTSoulja1]

Man, Silsbee got smoked.  Wasn’t expecting that.

[AggiesAreWe]

Check this run out.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[BMTSoulja1]

7 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Check this run out.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Mr. Clark…. Nice!

[AggiesAreWe]

West Brook big played Silsbee for this win. Of the seven TD's, six were 30+ yards or more, with four being 50+ or more.( includes the 90 yard pick six)

Silsbee actually finished the game with almost three times as many first downs as WB. Can't say I have ever seen a game where that stat came with a 35 point loss.

Silsbee moved the ball fairly well between the 20's. Just never could get it in the endzone efficiently. 

West Brook was just too fast on both sides of the ball for the Tigers.

I think I may have to attend that WB at PAM game on Oct. 17.

[AggiesAreWe]

BTW, I need to correct myself on the all time series between these two teams. I incorrectly posted that Silsbee led the series 2-1 going into this game. The correct record was 3-0 for Silsbee.

So this was the first time ever for West Brook to beat Silsbee.

[old guy 71]

4 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

West Brook big played Silsbee for this win. Of the seven TD's, six were 30+ yards or more, with four being 50+ or more.( includes the 90 yard pick six)

Silsbee actually finished the game with almost three times as many first downs as WB. Can't say I have ever seen a game where that stat came with a 35 point loss.

Silsbee moved the ball fairly well between the 20's. Just never could get it in the endzone efficiently. 

West Brook was just too fast on both sides of the ball for the Tigers.

I think I may have to attend that WB at PAM game on Oct. 17.

The top two leading tacklers for Silsbee were held out due to injury, ( linebackers) not sure outcome would have been any different, but might have slowed down couple big runs

[thaferrett]

5 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

West Brook big played Silsbee for this win. Of the seven TD's, six were 30+ yards or more, with four being 50+ or more.( includes the 90 yard pick six)

Silsbee actually finished the game with almost three times as many first downs as WB. Can't say I have ever seen a game where that stat came with a 35 point loss.

Silsbee moved the ball fairly well between the 20's. Just never could get it in the endzone efficiently. 

West Brook was just too fast on both sides of the ball for the Tigers.

I think I may have to attend that WB at PAM game on Oct. 17.

The pick 6 gave the Silsbee offense the ball right back so they got another possession.  Silsbee only had one drive over 30 yds. I'm surprised that Silsbee wasn't explosive yesterday,  

Good luck to the Tigers the rest of the way. 

[thaferrett]

1 hour ago, old guy 71 said:

The top two leading tacklers for Silsbee were held out due to injury, ( linebackers) not sure outcome would have been any different, but might have slowed down couple big runs

71 yd hurdle TD probably wouldn't of happened the young LB made false steps to his left but he had the B gap and left it open. 

#20 wouldn't of done that IMO