Another Trump Supreme Court win for Trump

[tvc184]

This should be simple but apparently not.

 There are three branches of government in the Constitution for the separation of powers.

One of those is the Executive Branch which is the president and everyone that answers to the president. Article II starts with:

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. 

Trump fired some bureaucrats from his administration. A federal judge stepped in and said you can’t do that and issued an injunction. The federal judge acted like the Executive Branch is like a union and the head of the Executive Branch, the president, has no control over who serves him without just cause… as approved the the Judicial Branch.

An appeal to the Ninth Circus got the same result with a 2-1 vote that the Constitution was wrong and the executive Power doesn’t lie with the president but the Judicial Branch who gets to determine if the president can fire his own bureaucrats.

Hmmmmm…. can we say the separation of powers?

So an appeal to the Supreme Court resulted in an 8-1 ruling staying the injunction. The ruling was that the government would likely win if the case was fought in trial and then all the way to the Supreme Court where Article II says that the POWER of the Executive Branch will be in a president.

Even Kagan and Sotomayor even agreed that yeah, that’s in the very first sentence of Article II. The only dissent was from, you guessed it, Brown Jackson. She is a kook. Her opinion is that the president doesn’t have complete control over the entire Executive Branch…. as is listed in the Constitution. If this was a private enterprise company and the owner wanted to fire an employee, the owner could not do so unless a judge agrees?

No wonder she couldn’t define a woman..…..🤣🤣🤣

[OlDawg]

Too technical and boring for her to read. She’s still trying to translate The Constitution into Ebonics.

[Reagan]

The ruling was 8-1, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting. Yet, as Justice Amy Coney Barrett did in the Casa decision, which curtailed lower court’s national injunction power, Jackson got cooked in the opinion, only it was by Sonia Sotomayor—she had to remind Jackson that the Court can only opine on what’s been presented before them, not what they think is being presented before the body.  You would think that Justice would know this.  But, we shouldn't be surprised -- she didn't even know what a woman was!  So, it's really, really bad when a commie (Sotomayor) finds it appalling how another commie voted.  Tell me again -- when does a DEI ever work out?!      

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up