Ain’t It Funny

[baddog]

Trump was elected President by a landslide, he has his appointed cabinet that had to be approved by congress, he has an elected congress that, for the time being, is GOP led. Trump has been called every name in the book but my favorite is dictator. With all these elected officials behind him, and every president has had their appointed cabinet, how can that title even be considered? The “funny” part is, the people who refer to Trump as a dictator, are the same ones who celebrate when a single federal judge (appointed, not elected) signs an injunction against Trump that has national power. Would this not be considered more dictatorial than following a President, his cabinet, and congress? Those who applaud this dictatorial move by a judge refer to it as protecting democracy. What a joke.

[UT alum]

On 5/26/2025 at 7:25 AM, baddog said:

Trump was elected President by a landslide, he has his appointed cabinet that had to be approved by congress, he has an elected congress that, for the time being, is GOP led. Trump has been called every name in the book but my favorite is dictator. With all these elected officials behind him, and every president has had their appointed cabinet, how can that title even be considered? The “funny” part is, the people who refer to Trump as a dictator, are the same ones who celebrate when a single federal judge (appointed, not elected) signs an injunction against Trump that has national power. Would this not be considered more dictatorial than following a President, his cabinet, and congress? Those who applaud this dictatorial move by a judge refer to it as protecting democracy. What a joke.

You are funny as all get out. A landslide is considered an election where the winner receives over 60% of the popular vote. Weasel got 49.7, not even a majority. To call it a landslide is laughable, to put it mildly. As for the courts, we have three equal branches. Checks and balances, you know? An injunction is not a final ruling. Man, you are digging deep and still coming up empty.

[baddog]

3 minutes ago, UT alum said:

You are funny as all get out. A landslide is considered an election where the winner receives over 60% of the popular vote. Weasel got 49.7, not even a majority. To call it a landslide is laughable, to put it mildly. As for the courts, we have three equal branches. Checks and balances, you know? An injunction is not a final ruling. Man, you are digging deep and still coming up empty.

It certainly is when people like you predicted a landslide for Kamala and Hillary. Lmao. You’re going to tell me about checks and balances? What I said is true. You simply can’t admit the hypocrisy. You are laughable. 

[UT alum]

30 minutes ago, baddog said:

It certainly is when people like you predicted a landslide for Kamala and Hillary. Lmao. You’re going to tell me about checks and balances? What I said is true. You simply can’t admit the hypocrisy. You are laughable. 

You are deluded.

[UT alum]

33 minutes ago, baddog said:

It certainly is when people like you predicted a landslide for Kamala and Hillary. Lmao. You’re going to tell me about checks and balances? What I said is true. You simply can’t admit the hypocrisy. You are laughable. 

Facts are stubborn things. A landslide isn’t 60%. I was incorrect. It is generally considered a landslide when the victory is by 15 points or more. It doesn’t matter what anyone predicts. A 2 point win is not even close to a landslide or mandate. I told you about checks and balances because your post demonstrated a misunderstanding of the separation of powers. You really need to work on your factual arguing skills.

[baddog]

6 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Facts are stubborn things. A landslide isn’t 60%. I was incorrect. It is generally considered a landslide when the victory is by 15 points or more. It doesn’t matter what anyone predicts. A 2 point win is not even close to a landslide or mandate. I told you about checks and balances because your post demonstrated a misunderstanding of the separation of powers. You really need to work on your factual arguing skills.

I give a box of rocks more credit than you. You are going to try and convince me that a federal judge can file an injunction that covers the entire country? That is for the Supreme Court. A single judge’s mandate is more powerful than the president? Talk about dictatorial. You are truly ate up with it. I do like your new moniker for Trump….Weasel….he is cunning and much smarter than you give him credit. Your hatred show in your every post. You trip over it.

[UT alum]

17 minutes ago, baddog said:

I give a box of rocks more credit than you. You are going to try and convince me that a federal judge can file an injunction that covers the entire country? That is for the Supreme Court. A single judge’s mandate is more powerful than the president? Talk about dictatorial. You are truly ate up with it. I do like your new moniker for Trump….Weasel….he is cunning and much smarter than you give him credit. Your hatred show in your every post. You trip over it.

Oh, you mean like that one in Texas that made the abortion pill I junction nationwide. And you call me a hypocrite. I’m telling you, man, weak arguing skills.

[baddog]

14 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Oh, you mean like that one in Texas that made the abortion pill I junction nationwide. And you call me a hypocrite. I’m telling you, man, weak arguing skills.

Well, Roe vs. Wade had been turned over to the states. Texas judge questioned the safety of the abortion drug and the injunction was brought on by a lawsuit. One would think that any woman considering killing their baby should think safety first. It was ed by the SC. Has any drug that has been approved by the FDA ever turned out to be unsafe? These rogue judges of yours have no lawsuits pending. They just stroke a pen to block Trump. 
Keep digging that hole. You would rather see an ms-13 gang member, wife beating, illegal alien get due process than Americans who were involved in Jan. 6th. They were wrongfully thrown in solitary confinement without due process. You even support hamas which means you support the enemy. What kind of an American does that?

Since you felt it necessary to point out the three branches with checks and balances, how can Trump be called a dictator? Ain’t it funny? Lmao