UT alum Posted Wednesday at 11:38 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 11:38 PM 35 minutes ago, Porter said: Beto 2.0 has no one scared. He’s a nut job. Beto 2.0? Read this. All of it. The hard numbers (actual votes cast) say otherwise. Another reason to can Paxton. Here’s a scenario: Bondi had botched the Epstein case so badly, Trump will pin everything on her and fire her. Paxton gets promoted from Texas AG to AG of U.S. if he drops out. He’ll be gone whatever the scenario. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
UT alum Posted Wednesday at 11:49 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 11:49 PM 1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said: So the title of this thread turned out to be opinion and not fact. Interesting Look at the link in my post to Porter below. It’s got facts. Lots of them. Quote
UT alum Posted Wednesday at 11:50 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 11:50 PM 1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said: So the title of this thread turned out to be opinion and not fact. Interesting Above Quote
1989NDN Posted yesterday at 12:00 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:00 AM 38 minutes ago, Porter said: Yeah….. the Angelic Democrat Party can’t even define what a woman is. Come on CB! At least Paxton knows the difference between a taco and hot dog. One of Paxton's problems is that he eats too many tacos. He eats his taco at home, and other people's tacos at the office and when he's on the road. I like tacos too, but I don't sneak around and eat tacos behind my wife's back. Quote
TheMissingBand Posted yesterday at 12:16 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:16 AM 15 minutes ago, 1989NDN said: One of Paxton's problems is that he eats too many tacos. He eats his taco at home, and other people's tacos at the office and when he's on the road. I like tacos too, but I don't sneak around and eat tacos behind my wife's back. It’s sad when the candidate with zero integrity keeps turning out to have the unwavering support of the GOP. Quote
Porter Posted yesterday at 12:44 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:44 AM 42 minutes ago, 1989NDN said: One of Paxton's problems is that he eats too many tacos. He eats his taco at home, and other people's tacos at the office and when he's on the road. I like tacos too, but I don't sneak around and eat tacos behind my wife's back. Lol, I know I was just making the comparison that the Dems can’t even define a woman and Paxton….well he definitely knows what a woman is.😂 Ty Cobb 1 Quote
Porter Posted yesterday at 12:48 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:48 AM 27 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said: It’s sad when the candidate with zero integrity keeps turning out to have the unwavering support of the GOP. News Flash …..DC is a cesspool on the Republican side and Democrat side. Enough with the Pure Angelic Wally Clever Politicians . Good grief. Ty Cobb 1 Quote
Porter Posted yesterday at 12:49 AM Report Posted yesterday at 12:49 AM 1 hour ago, UT alum said: Beto 2.0? Read this. All of it. The hard numbers (actual votes cast) say otherwise. Another reason to can Paxton. Here’s a scenario: Bondi had botched the Epstein case so badly, Trump will pin everything on her and fire her. Paxton gets promoted from Texas AG to AG of U.S. if he drops out. He’ll be gone whatever the scenario. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Bruh…believe what you want to believe. I told you my opinion. Quote
UT alum Posted yesterday at 01:05 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:05 AM 2 hours ago, TheMissingBand said: One of the big reasons why Paxton only spent 4 Million…. Some of his major financial backers asked him not to run, but he did… so they cut him off. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I'm curious if the big donor bucks are what’s really keeping Trump from endorsing the guy he’d assume to be the most MAGA…. Paxton. Paxton is as slimy and corrupt as they come, so that’s right up MAGA’s alley. I think the money would abandon Paxton at this point, but the mouthbreathers on the right are infatuated with him, even though he’s a complete crook. Trump DOES NOT CARE about anything but himself, his image, and his brand. If the numbers look bad and enough people like John Thune get it into his head that Paxton will be a loser in November,, he’ll be gone. Trump hates losers, don’t you know?. Here’s a scenario: Bondi has botched the Epstein investigation so badly that Trump pins it all on her and fires her. Paxton gets promoted from Tx AG to US AG if he’ll step down. Wouldn’t surprise me. Either way, Paxton’s toast. Quote
UT alum Posted yesterday at 01:08 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:08 AM 1 minute ago, UT alum said: Trump DOES NOT CARE about anything but himself, his image, and his brand. If the numbers look bad and enough people like John Thune get it into his head that Paxton will be a loser in November,, he’ll be gone. Trump hates losers, don’t you know?. Here’s a scenario: Bondi has botched the Epstein investigation so badly that Trump pins it all on her and fires her. Paxton gets promoted from Tx AG to US AG if he’ll step down. Wouldn’t surprise me. Either way, Paxton’s toast. Didn’t mean to repeat the scenario. 17 minutes ago, Porter said: Bruh…believe what you want to believe. I told you my opinion. We’ll find out which one is right by the end of next week. Quote
Porter Posted yesterday at 01:08 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:08 AM 1 minute ago, UT alum said: Trump DOES NOT CARE about anything but himself, his image, and his brand. If the numbers look bad and enough people like John Thune get it into his head that Paxton will be a loser in November,, he’ll be gone. Trump hates losers, don’t you know?. Here’s a scenario: Bondi has botched the Epstein investigation so badly that Trump pins it all on her and fires her. Paxton gets promoted from Tx AG to US AG if he’ll step down. Wouldn’t surprise me. Either way, Paxton’s toast. That’s a nice story about a man named Jed who barely kept his family fed. Lol Carry on… Quote
UT alum Posted yesterday at 01:10 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:10 AM 2 minutes ago, Porter said: That’s a nice story about a man named Jed who barely kept his family fed. Lol Carry on… You oughtta watch it. Quote
Porter Posted yesterday at 01:37 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:37 AM 25 minutes ago, UT alum said: You oughtta watch it. Watch what? the Beverly Hillbillies? I’ve seen about every episode. Classic show! Quote
Porter Posted yesterday at 01:43 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:43 AM 34 minutes ago, UT alum said: Trump DOES NOT CARE about anything but himself, his image, and his brand. If the numbers look bad and enough people like John Thune get it into his head that Paxton will be a loser in November,, he’ll be gone. Trump hates losers, don’t you know?. Here’s a scenario: Bondi has botched the Epstein investigation so badly that Trump pins it all on her and fires her. Paxton gets promoted from Tx AG to US AG if he’ll step down. Wouldn’t surprise me. Either way, Paxton’s toast. At the end of the day politicians always go to the highest bidder and if Trump does endorse Cornyn it’ll deflate his base. Quote
Reagan Posted yesterday at 01:47 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 01:47 AM 3 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: So the title of this thread turned out to be opinion and not fact. Interesting It’s a delayed factual reaction! 😏 Quote
TheMissingBand Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Oh, my… The news today is that Paxton stated that he wouldn’t withdraw from the Senate race if Trump endorsed Cornyn. Trump fired back with “that’s bad… it might make me endorse the other guy (Cornyn).” This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Later this afternoon Paxton somewhat backed off saying that IF the SAVE Act were passed, etc, he would drop out if Trump endorses Cornyn. Let me get this straight. A candidate needs to preemptively agree to drop out of the race if not endorsed by Trump in order to gain the endorsement? That’s bananas. Here’s a question for Reagan, and anybody else that supports Paxton. If Trump endorses Cornyn, will you move your support to Cornyn? Do the voters in Texas get to pick their next senator, or does the President? I think Trump probably prefers Paxton, but also recognizes that Paxton is a liability in the general election. If Trump loses enough senate seats, he might not be able to fight off any of his future impeachments. He needs Cornyn to win against Talarico. But he’s also going to have to find a job for Paxton, since Paxton will be out of a job on 1/1/27. I could also see Trump offering Paxton tbt US AG spot if Bondi goes down. I think Trump is playing games and will endorse Paxton shortly. Quote
HangPDFs Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Reagan will endorse whoever Trump endorses. MAGAs are bots with no original thought. Look how quickly they flip flop on no new wars, Epstein files, federal debt, etc.. 4 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said: Oh, my… The news today is that Paxton stated that he wouldn’t withdraw from the Senate race if Trump endorsed Cornyn. Trump fired back with “that’s bad… it might make me endorse the other guy (Cornyn).” This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Later this afternoon Paxton somewhat backed off saying that IF the SAVE Act were passed, etc, he would drop out if Trump endorses Cornyn. Let me get this straight. A candidate needs to preemptively agree to drop out of the race if not endorsed by Trump in order to gain the endorsement? That’s bananas. Here’s a question for Reagan, and anybody else that supports Paxton. If Trump endorses Cornyn, will you move your support to Cornyn? Do the voters in Texas get to pick their next senator, or does the President? I think Trump probably prefers Paxton, but also recognizes that Paxton is a liability in the general election. If Trump loses enough senate seats, he might not be able to fight off any of his future impeachments. He needs Cornyn to win against Talarico. But he’s also going to have to find a job for Paxton, since Paxton will be out of a job on 1/1/27. I could also see Trump offering Paxton tbt US AG spot if Bondi goes down. I think Trump is playing games and will endorse Paxton shortly. Quote
Reagan Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, TheMissingBand said: Oh, my… The news today is that Paxton stated that he wouldn’t withdraw from the Senate race if Trump endorsed Cornyn. Trump fired back with “that’s bad… it might make me endorse the other guy (Cornyn).” This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Later this afternoon Paxton somewhat backed off saying that IF the SAVE Act were passed, etc, he would drop out if Trump endorses Cornyn. Let me get this straight. A candidate needs to preemptively agree to drop out of the race if not endorsed by Trump in order to gain the endorsement? That’s bananas. Here’s a question for Reagan, and anybody else that supports Paxton. If Trump endorses Cornyn, will you move your support to Cornyn? Do the voters in Texas get to pick their next senator, or does the President? I think Trump probably prefers Paxton, but also recognizes that Paxton is a liability in the general election. If Trump loses enough senate seats, he might not be able to fight off any of his future impeachments. He needs Cornyn to win against Talarico. But he’s also going to have to find a job for Paxton, since Paxton will be out of a job on 1/1/27. I could also see Trump offering Paxton tbt US AG spot if Bondi goes down. I think Trump is playing games and will endorse Paxton shortly. I will vote for Paxton regardless if Trump endorses Cornyn. I would be highly disappointed though if Trump endorse a swamp creature. I personally think Paxton actually has already won it. Historically speaking, when an incumbent barely wins a primary race that incumbent usually loses the runoff. This is why the other swamp creature, Thune, wants to make a deal with Trump to protect Cornyn. Why would it matter to Thune? Thune’s not from Texas. He’s trying to protect his fellow swamp rat. Don’t really seeing Trump play that game. I agree with you, I think Trump will end up endorsing Paxton. Think about this: If Trump agreed to the Thune deal of passing the SAVE act for the endorsement — who says Thune won’t renege on it after Cornyn wins?! One always has to think this might happen. Why? Because that’s what swamp rats do!! 🐀 Quote
TheMissingBand Posted 21 minutes ago Report Posted 21 minutes ago 27 minutes ago, Reagan said: I will vote for Paxton regardless if Trump endorses Cornyn. I would be highly disappointed though if Trump endorse a swamp creature. I personally think Paxton actually has already won it. Historically speaking, when an incumbent barely wins a primary race that incumbent usually loses the runoff. This is why the other swamp creature, Thune, wants to make a deal with Trump to protect Cornyn. Why would it matter to Thune? Thune’s not from Texas. He’s trying to protect his fellow swamp rat. Don’t really seeing Trump play that game. I agree with you, I think Trump will end up endorsing Paxton. Think about this: If Trump agreed to the Thune deal of passing the SAVE act for the endorsement — who says Thune won’t renege on it after Cornyn wins?! One always has to think this might happen. Why? Because that’s what swamp rats do!! 🐀 The idea that Paxton is virtuous and all others an are “swamp rats” indicates an unreasonableness that quite simply shouldn’t go without a complete psychological examination. But back on subject. My opinion goes like this. No matter which R candidate is chosen, Trump gets an automatic “yes” vote on everything. He just needs one of them to get elected, but the outcomes for Trump wont change unless Talarico gets elected. I like cornyn’s chances of getting endorsed and nominated better now that he finished first in the primary. BUT Paxton’s AG position brought with it a license to legitimately raise havoc on a statewide and federal level. Paxton’s willingness to pursue baseless claims and loyalty to Trump were invaluable. As AG he could sue anybody, make any outlandish claim, IGNORE ANY CRIMINALITY, etc… as a senator he can do what? Vote yes? Vote no? Sponsor a bill that never sees the floor of the senate? It’s a waste of his experience and lack of principles. That’s why I believe that the backers like Tim Dunn didn’t want Paxton to run for Senator. But I’m not sure where this leaves everybody. Paxton will need a job. Could Trump have him picked to succeed Bondi? Her job expectancy should be measured in minutes, not months at this point. It’s also important to note that the senate is the more refined of the two bodies. You typically don’t have the theatrics that you see in the House. I suspect that the last thing that any of the senators want is Paxton on the scene, being Paxton. Rand Paul is bad enough. Do they want a complete tool who’s willing to do anything and everything to please Trump, no matter what, while effectively lowering the average IQ of the whole body? No. And they might have Trump’s ear on the thing. “Endorse Cornyn and we’ll pass the SAVE Act,” or something like that. It’s too early to tell, but generally speaking Paxton would make a crappy addition to the Senate, while also losing his effectiveness and range as Trump’s lap dog. in my opinion, of course. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.