Redskins Not Racist

[baddog]

anymore. To me it never was.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[tvc184]

I said it in another thread.

If you are looking to be offended, you will be offended.

Even if it has to come from someone telling you that you are to be offended. 

[baddog]

1 hour ago, tvc184 said:

I said it in another thread.

If you are looking to be offended, you will be offended.

Even if it has to come from someone telling you that you are to be offended. 

I have heard that the Commander of the 5th Fleet is offended by the current name. 

[5GallonBucket]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[UT alum]

On 8/14/2023 at 3:48 AM, baddog said:

anymore. To me it never was.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

If it is a term offends indigenous people, then it’s racist. You have to believe African Americans have no right to be offended by use of the pejorative “N” word if you think that way. You have no clue.

[baddog]

10 minutes ago, UT alum said:

If it is a term offends indigenous people, then it’s racist. You have to believe African Americans have no right to be offended by use of the pejorative “N” word if you think that way. You have no clue.

Typical liberal mind showing the gears attempting to turn. You draw conclusions where they are not warranted. The Indians are NOT offended by the term redskin. It’s the snowflakes pushing a narrative…..and yet you call me clueless. Sure am glad you keep up with current posts. The one you quoted is almost 2 years old. Try and keep up.

[Reagan]

I wonder how many people through the years who never gave the name Redskins a thought are now outraged because someone told them to be?  And BTW -- what's wrong with calling Indians Indians?  

[tvc184]

30 minutes ago, Reagan said:

I wonder how many people through the years who never gave the name Redskins a thought are now outraged because someone told them to be?  And BTW -- what's wrong with calling Indians Indians?  

Since it’s how they refer to each other and their own organizations…… 

[Big girl]

5 hours ago, UT alum said:

If it is a term offends indigenous people, then it’s racist. You have to believe African Americans have no right to be offended by use of the pejorative “N” word if you think that way. You have no clue.

It is laughable how they try to tell someone not to be offended. Ridiculous. They don't think it is offensive because they are not Indians. Duh.

[Big girl]

28 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

Since it’s how they refer to each other and their own organizations…… 

Redskins is a derogatory term.

[Big girl]

28 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

Since it’s how they refer to each other and their own organizations…… 

They should rename the team the Cleveland Whities

[Big girl]

4 hours ago, baddog said:

Typical liberal mind showing the gears attempting to turn. You draw conclusions where they are not warranted. The Indians are NOT offended by the term redskin. It’s the snowflakes pushing a narrative…..and yet you call me clueless. Sure am glad you keep up with current posts. The one you quoted is almost 2 years old. Try and keep up.

Yes, they are.

[baddog]

12 minutes ago, Big girl said:

They should rename the team the Cleveland Whities

Cleveland Caucasians, but this is about The Washington Redskins.

[baddog]

4 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Yes, they are.

Here you go. Tired of doing your research. 
 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up