Jump to content

100% of Democrats Vote Against Stopping Men From Infiltrating Women’s Sports!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

The fact that you post this (and I assume believe it), then have a handful of like-minded people "like" your post indicates how badly brainwashed that you all are. 

Patriots back in the late 1700s started a revolution over taxation by the British.  In 2023 you have "Patriots" who are cool with the ultra rich not paying anything while the rest of us do.  That's when you know you're dealing with morons. 

The rich pay the bulk of our taxes, whether personal income or capital gains.

I’m all for folks keeping as much as they can legally.

I would say you’re the brainwashed one, you’ve bought into the lie than the government deserves your hard earned money more than you.

You never know, maybe Bezos will decide to pay more taxes so your life will improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

The rich pay the bulk of our taxes, whether personal income or capital gains.

I’m all for folks keeping as much as they can legally.

I would say you’re the brainwashed one, you’ve bought into the lie than the government deserves your hard earned money more than you.

You never know, maybe Bezos will decide to pay more taxes so your life will improve.

You don’t understand. 
 

People pay income taxes on money they earn. Capital gains taxes are a type of income tax that’s paid when you sell an asset.

These guys don’t claim income, they receive stock. That stock isn’t taxed as income OR capital gains because they really haven’t sold anything, yet… we all still agree, right?

The problem is that these guys take out LOANS (which aren’t taxable) against those assets and use the proceeds of those loans to buy jets, yachts, and mansions without paying a penny in income taxes like I (and I assume you) have to do. 
 

If your argument is “yeah, but good for him. I wouldn’t pay taxes if I didn’t have to, either” then you are delusional. My guess is that you’re probably one of those people that got really mad that most poor people don’t pay any income taxes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I didn't say anything about the political beliefs of the rich people who aren't paying ANY taxes like the rest of us do.

 

This is how you know that we're ALL stupid on both sides of the aisle.  You have poor people on one side voting D because they want more handouts, then you have poor people on the other side fighting so that a select few rich people don't have to pay taxes, in hopes that some of the crumbs might come their way.  

 

Your argument is that it's perfectly okay (not legal.... but okay) that we have a guy with multiple golf resorts, hotels, mansions, and a jet airliner of his very own that pays no personal income taxes?  But you'll turn around and argue about people on welfare getting EIC payments? It's baffling.   We have a progressive tax system where (in theory) people who earn more pay more taxes on the higher portion of their incomes... except the ultra rich pay nothing, and you're cool with that?  Because I'm not. 

Is he following the laws of the tax code?  I guarantee he still pays more taxes than either of us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

The fact that you post this (and I assume believe it), then have a handful of like-minded people "like" your post indicates how badly brainwashed that you all are. 

Patriots back in the late 1700s started a revolution over taxation by the British.  In 2023 you have "Patriots" who are cool with the ultra rich not paying anything while the rest of us do.  That's when you know you're dealing with morons. 

Change the tax code!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

You don’t understand. 
 

People pay income taxes on money they earn. Capital gains taxes are a type of income tax that’s paid when you sell an asset.

These guys don’t claim income, they receive stock. That stock isn’t taxed as income OR capital gains because they really haven’t sold anything, yet… we all still agree, right?

The problem is that these guys take out LOANS (which aren’t taxable) against those assets and use the proceeds of those loans to buy jets, yachts, and mansions without paying a penny in income taxes like I (and I assume you) have to do. 
 

If your argument is “yeah, but good for him. I wouldn’t pay taxes if I didn’t have to, either” then you are delusional. My guess is that you’re probably one of those people that got really mad that most poor people don’t pay any income taxes. 

I understand perfectly.

You don’t like the game so you demonize the players that are actually playing by the rules, just like I would and so would you.

The democrats love it, it’s class warfare showing itself to be successful but don’t worry, there are millions that’s fall for the same line that our financial woes are because the rich guys aren’t paying their fair share.

Guess what, we don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem and you could tax the rich at 100% and it wouldn’t solve a thing, absolutely nothing.

Like BSW said, change the tax code if you can, but don’t blame the guys playing by the rules, who wouldn’t?

The money is always more effective when left in the private sector rather than put in the government slush fund.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I understand perfectly.

You don’t like the game so you demonize the players that are actually playing by the rules, just like I would and so would you.

The democrats love it, it’s class warfare showing itself to be successful but don’t worry, there are millions that’s fall for the same line that our financial woes are because the rich guys aren’t paying their fair share.

Guess what, we don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem and you could tax the rich at 100% and it wouldn’t solve a thing, absolutely nothing.

Like BSW said, change the tax code if you can, but don’t blame the guys playing by the rules, who wouldn’t?

The money is always more effective when left in the private sector rather than put in the government slush fund.

You’re missing the point… why is it legal for the ultra rich to pay no income taxes, and more importantly, why are middle class and lower class Republicans cheering the fact that the ultra rich don’t have to pay taxes like the rest of us do?

That’s brainwashed.  
 

And we should be joining with the Dems to make sure that guys like CEOs pay income taxes on the millions of dollars that finance their lavish lifestyles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

You’re missing the point… why is it legal for the ultra rich to pay no income taxes, and more importantly, why are middle class and lower class Republicans cheering the fact that the ultra rich don’t have to pay taxes like the rest of us do?

That’s brainwashed.  
 

And we should be joining with the Dems to make sure that guys like CEOs pay income taxes on the millions of dollars that finance their lavish lifestyles. 

OK, you worry about that one.

I'll worry about things that actually have an impact on my life.

By the way, the democrats play the same game, very telling that you don't know that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

You’re missing the point… why is it legal for the ultra rich to pay no income taxes, and more importantly, why are middle class and lower class Republicans cheering the fact that the ultra rich don’t have to pay taxes like the rest of us do?

That’s brainwashed.  
 

And we should be joining with the Dems to make sure that guys like CEOs pay income taxes on the millions of dollars that finance their lavish lifestyles. 

Cardinal is that you lightning that firecracker? 😃

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

from gays and drag to trans now pedophiles 

like I said in another post. Once you open the can 

Saw that yesterday and thought the same thing, the left never stops taking once it starts, just like the child euthanasia you posted about earlier, 30 years down the road we’ll be seeing Down syndrome children euthanized for nothing more than convenience if the left has it’s way.

Can’t stress it enough that these folks can’t be compromised with, there’s no reaching across the aisle on something like this, they have to be defeated, what’s sad is you have ignorant folks that can’t seem to see this obvious trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...