Wow

[baddog]

 

[SmashMouth]

I freakin love it!

[5GallonBucket]

9 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

I freakin love it!

2nd that

[tvc184]

It seems like they are trying to Weaponized the DOJ.

From the Attorney General and it is true, this was not sent to parents it was basically interdepartmental. It was a DOJ  prosecutor memo.  But….

Unless the congressman lied, he read the phrase, annoying phone calls. The AG deflected and started talking about intimidation which is a threat and we all understand. But apparently the memo said annoying. Annoying just means something I don’t like. If a school board member gets an annoying phone call, is the DOJ even going to contemplate prosecution?

Then it goes on to emotional distress. Again, that is like annoying. A person disagrees with me so that causes me stress. Federal crime? He talked bad about me on Facebook, indict him! 

There is too much to take apart but the AG says, we are concerned about violence and the threat of violence. Sure, we all agree about that. If that is all this was about, do they really need an internal memo to explain to professional prosecutors/lawyers what a threat or what an act of violence is?

I was a police supervisor for 20 years. Maybe I’m wrong but I’ve never felt the need to tell one of my patrol officers that if someone shoots someone or threatens to kill them, that is a crime. Apparently in the DOJ at some level, feels the need to remind these professionals of what the law is.

I understand that the AG might not have personally seen that memo. It still concerns me that some prosecutor in the DOJ felt it needed to be written after getting complaints from the school board. The AG has now found out about this memo which he apparently disagrees with it by saying he did not know about it, deflecting it to one of his subordinates.  Now that he knows what his prosecutors are doing, I wonder if he is going to take action against them.

Don’t hold your breath…