Jump to content

Silsbee 84 Houston Booker T. Washington 83/FINAL


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, SportsJunkie32 said:

Yes Washington is a bad team, I have watched Washington play this season and they do not rebound well, has no height and their press is a joke

They rebounded fairly well tonight,  their height is about the same as the Tigers although if you went and compared man to man in the starting 5 we may have had an inch or 2 advantage.....which is very rare this year.  And as fir their press,  i wouldnt say it was great but tonight it gave us some trouble. I do wonderwhich one of the two teams was the worse free throw shooting team tonight buti think it was probably the team that ended up on the short side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ST413 said:

Service in Crosby was very sketchy to say the least.  Our Tigers definitely looked lackluster tonight.  We looked sluggish or lazy on some of our passes,  defense and rebounding much of the time. It looked like you might get 2 or 3 Tigers going all out at one time but never all together.  If we get through friday night and play against Yates press and dont improve on how we handled the press tonight, it wont be pretty to say the least.  Tonight we almost lost the game at the free throw line and yet we won it at the free throw line at the same time.  Yes i know doesnt make much sense when you read it.  But what i am getting at is we missed enough free throws to lose the game.  Yet Washington shot just as bad if not worse from the line to allow us to win.  At the end of the day the only thing that matters at this time of the year is moving on to the next round and we are going back tomour second home in Huntsville.  Way to go Tigers!  Way to pull through on an off night and live to play another day.

Internet service was terrible. Couldn't get my broadcast to stay connected.

Silsbee was 12/26 FT and 2 of 24 three's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bush finished with 32 but that was probably the worst game I have seen him play this season. Missed several layups, was 1 of 9 from three, had several turnovers and didn't play very well on the defensive end.

With the opportunities that Washington gave Silsbee tonight, Tigers should have had another 100 point night.

Washington's last lead was 7-6. Silsbee led by as much as 13.

Silsbee was fortunate to win this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...