Jump to content

Silsbee 80 Bridge City 71/FINAL


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Tigers94 said:

I thought Bridge City was supposed to have a respectable squad this year.

Score shouldn't be that surprising, so long as they didn't actually win. The new Williams kids makes, I think, 3 freshman on this Tiger team now. Man were getting young.

Is he a freshman? Didnt realize that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Jones and Williams are the only freshman

23 is a freshman that was playing even before we added the football players. Has or had still been on the varsity and was starting before the football players and I believe has in a game or two since they started playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tigers94 said:

23 is Harper.

He still starts sometimes. He started all the games for the little kitten version of Silsbee.

Wasn't sure if they moved him down to JV so he could get more playing time or not.

Not unless it was done recently.  I wasn’t in Dallas and of course didn’t get to see todays game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AxeEm said:

And BC started 4 underclassmen.  What’s your point?  You’re best player (by far) is a senior.   BC will be the favorite in this game next year at BC.   

I think his post was to correct me. I thought Silsbee only had two freshmen on varsity, not four. I stand corrected. Nothing really to do with BC.

I would say the best two players are seniors (Bush, Martin).

I do agree that next year will be the year to "get" Silsbee. But I did notice that Silsbee JV did beat BC JV by 40.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

Silsbee or HJ will win district with BC and Lumberton coming in 3rd and 4th. I would feel better about Silsbee if they still had Cartwright and Harmon making it Regionals. We could be 3rd round max now. We shall see. 

I can see Silsbee and HJ playing three times this year...🤷🏻‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is possible that Silsbee has the two best players in the District in Bush and Martin. I believe the coaches are working hard to find plays who can play roles to make the team successful. It would not surprise me if some of those players do not develop more in the next two months than any other players in the district because there are specific roles that need to be filled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...