LCM v Vidor Game Thread

[adminbaberuth]

Final

WP LCM -Elhert

LP Vidor-Whitford

LCM.. 010-022-4...9

Vid.... 100-000-0...1

LCM Landon Womack 2 run HR

[KFDM COOP]

LC-M 9

Vidor 1

[SETXBaseball]

1-1 going into the top of the 5th things went kinda down heel from there vidor made a few costly mistakes lcm capitalized and ran with it.

[KFDM COOP]

Vidor has a very good team. Cut down on the Errors and they'll be in the mix at the end..I ws there tonight and the starting Pitcher did a heck of a job.

[VPbaseball06]

womak wasn't the only person with a good hit tonight...please tell me somebody saw more than just that

[VPbaseball06]

i'm not taking credit away from him in any way tho i didn't meen disrespect

[KFDM COOP]

Vidor had some good hits as well. The 3rd baseman did a heck of a job on defense.

[LHS90]

SETXBaseball no disrespect to you or Vidor, but I think that Vidor may be a year away from making the playoffs. They are young and they are good, but with young players you have inconsisitant plays. I still think that

1 LC-M

2 Ned

3 PN-G

[Bears]

Good Ball game all around, Vidor is much improved and continues to improve each year.

They came out swinging in the first and scored 1 but left the bases full.

The 3rd baseman kept the game from being opened up in the 2nd on a diving backhand, that was one of 2 outstanding plays by him.

LCM just kept putting on pressure, probably hit the ball harder tonight than all season, but most of them were right at guys or to the deepest part of the park.

Vidor still has a shot, they need to take care of business with the lower teams and again pull off 1 more big win and they could be there.

LCM is now 18-4 and 6-0 scoring 55 runs and allowing 4 in the first round of district.

[callumlikeiseeum]

55? to 4?

[Bears]

CALL,

That's not a type O'

#1 Lumberton- 10-0

#2 PNG- 7-1

#3 Ned 3-2

#4 Ozen 10-0

#5 Central- 16-0

#6 Vidor 9-1

2 no hit games #1 Lumberton(Ehlert,Womack)

#2 Central (Adams,Cassidy,Hughes)

[ESPN]

Pretty impressive! I still think Vidor may slip in 3rd. We'll see.