Jump to content

Ofdicial Crow eating Thread, yall come get a piece of Biaplayer


biaplayer

Recommended Posts

I got some crow gumbo for you! Mr 70 points on Nederland.

So got a question since you might fall in this catagory with several people saying BF played to conservative. But I have heard several times today at work from PNG fans that BF should have went for two when it was 20-27 and y’all kicked the extra point to make it 20-28. Do you agree with your png peeps Biaplayer or no? Would that help BF not be to conservative? Because several years ago he tried to go for two when y’all had that shorter qb Walker and were calling for his head about being to aggressive now he is to conservative from what I am hearing and reading on this forum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigdog said:

#5 - Nice fields don't win games, players do as you found out ... again.  Come to think of it we win on your field too.  :)

You mean on our nice evenly balanced fair  turf field & not the mud slop field that your team got to practice on. Oh yeah that;s right, it had no effect on the game. lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

I got some crow gumbo for you! Mr 70 points on Nederland.

So got a question since you might fall in this catagory with several people saying BF played to conservative. But I have heard several times today at work from PNG fans that BF should have went for two when it was 20-27 and y’all kicked the extra point to make it 20-28. Do you agree with your png peeps Biaplayer or no? Would that help BF not be to conservative? Because several years ago he tried to go for two when y’all had that shorter qb Walker and were calling for his head about being to aggressive now he is to conservative from what I am hearing and reading on this forum. 

If you watched any PN-G games this year you would have seen that running RJ 40 times is not the offense he has ran. I think by saying conservative they mean he abandoned the pass. Hughes and Stansbury were getting one on one coverage and Stansbury did not have an incompletion thrown his way. Also all the pooch kicks when we have a kicker that can kick it out of the end zone was nerve racking. 10 or 15 yards is not a huge deal but when Nederland scored with only 13 seconds left it could have been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, aki1994 said:

If you watched any PN-G games this year you would have seen that running RJ 40 times is not the offense he has ran. I think by saying conservative they mean he abandoned the pass. Hughes and Stansbury were getting one on one coverage and Stansbury did not have an incompletion thrown his way. Also all the pooch kicks when we have a kicker that can kick it out of the end zone was nerve racking. 10 or 15 yards is not a huge deal but when Nederland scored with only 13 seconds left it could have been. 

Nederland could have had 95 yards to go. PNG was not stopping the big two. When PNG loaded the box and brought the safety down the post was wide open deep middle. When y’all dropped the linebackers back into coverage no one wasn’t touching Simmons after about 4 yards past the line of scrimmage and he was getting extra yac due to poor tackling and wrapping up. Huge difference I seen from both defenses was PNG not wrapping up and Nederland was. But something that people aren’t saying is Nederland was gang tackling. All 11 gold helmets would be within 5 yards after PNG player was down. (Mainly RJ) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

Nederland could have had 95 yards to go. PNG was not stopping the big two. When PNG loaded the box and brought the safety down the post was wide open deep middle. When y’all dropped the linebackers back into coverage no one wasn’t touching Simmons after about 4 yards past the line of scrimmage and he was getting extra yac due to poor tackling and wrapping up. Huge difference I seen from both defenses was PNG not wrapping up and Nederland was. But something that people aren’t saying is Nederland was gang tackling. All 11 gold helmets would be within 5 yards after PNG player was down. (Mainly RJ) 

I am not getting into what ifs. Just trying to help explain what people might mean by Faircloth being conservative. Nederland played a better game. Plain and simple. Better game plan and better execution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, png9mon said:

You mean on our nice evenly balanced fair  turf field & not the mud slop field that your team got to practice on. Oh yeah that;s right, it had no effect on the game. lol!

So I guess only one team played on the field right?  Like I said the you have lost on you nice expensive field turf too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

I got some crow gumbo for you! Mr 70 points on Nederland.

So got a question since you might fall in this catagory with several people saying BF played to conservative. But I have heard several times today at work from PNG fans that BF should have went for two when it was 20-27 and y’all kicked the extra point to make it 20-28. Do you agree with your png peeps Biaplayer or no? Would that help BF not be to conservative? Because several years ago he tried to go for two when y’all had that shorter qb Walker and were calling for his head about being to aggressive now he is to conservative from what I am hearing and reading on this forum. 

Going for two up 7 would have to be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, navydawg31 said:

I got some crow gumbo for you! Mr 70 points on Nederland.

So got a question since you might fall in this catagory with several people saying BF played to conservative. But I have heard several times today at work from PNG fans that BF should have went for two when it was 20-27 and y’all kicked the extra point to make it 20-28. Do you agree with your png peeps Biaplayer or no? Would that help BF not be to conservative? Because several years ago he tried to go for two when y’all had that shorter qb Walker and were calling for his head about being to aggressive now he is to conservative from what I am hearing and reading on this forum. 

Definately non educated folks talking that nonsense. You don't go for 2 in that situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, png9mon said:

You mean on our nice evenly balanced fair  turf field & not the mud slop field that your team got to practice on. Oh yeah that;s right, it had no effect on the game. lol!

Nederland has the obvious speed edge if you watched the game. We just watered the field down to slow our guys down to give y’all a chance. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, png9mon said:

You mean on our nice evenly balanced fair  turf field & not the mud slop field that your team got to practice on. Oh yeah that;s right, it had no effect on the game. lol!

1 hour ago, jake94 said:

Nederland has the obvious speed edge if you watched the game. We just watered the field down to slow our guys down to give y’all a chance. LOL

 

1 hour ago, jake94 said:

 

I was in complete awe of Shug running to the tune of 292 yards on that muddy disgraceful field. Cant believe he managed. You would think that football was invented on grass !!!! WOW!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, outanup said:

 

I was in complete awe of Shug running to the tune of 292 yards on that muddy disgraceful field. Cant believe he managed. You would think that football was invented on grass !!!! WOW!!!!!!!!

Don’t worry bro we get ragged a lot about still having a grass field. We’re not very cosmopolitan are we! Imagine that.......playing football on real grass! The nerve! Lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...