Jump to content

New Era


nappyroots

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, nappyroots said:

This is the hidden content, please

This country will be set back 70 years. 

Not worried about radical muslim terrorism, bringing 290 muslim migrants in every day, 94 million people not working, debt doubling under obama, massive food stamp increase, 3,900 people killed in Chicago, and this is what the Dems are going to use as a game plan moving forward?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, nappyroots said:

This is the hidden content, please

This country will be set back 70 years. 

Here's the real news! As long as they keep the gutter news going then their low information crowd won't see the important stuff. Or, should I say, how the people they support are actually destroying their party!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, nappyroots said:

This is the hidden content, please

This country will be set back 70 years. 

Too funny,

First, surely you don't believe that dribble and are just stirring the pot. I get it.

Secondly, you are talking about a generation that has a tendency toward rap music which can be so far beyond a locker room statement it is hardly comparable. 

I might suggest counseling and strong anti-psychotic drugs for those on the left that actually believe that we will go back any time.... except maybe any time before Obama. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, nappyroots said:

This is the hidden content, please

This country will be set back 70 years. 

At least the liberals take care of the really pressing issues.  I don't know how our country survived for 240 years without a 3rd gender.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is fascinating how, at least 75% of the liberal post/links, concern things that on a national/global scale are relatively insignificant.  Appears that's the reason most liberals are low information folks.  In my typical simplistic fashion, they worry about a mosquito on their arm, while ignoring the 18 wheeler about to run over them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, REBgp said:

It is fascinating how, at least 75% of the liberal post/links, concern things that on a national/global scale are relatively insignificant.  Appears that's the reason most liberals are low information folks.  In my typical simplistic fashion, they worry about a mosquito on their arm, while ignoring the 18 wheeler about to run over them.  

And are still 100% convinced that they are the "smarter" people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...