Jump to content

NACOGDOCHES CENTRAL HEIGHTS TOURNAMENT/POST UPDATES HERE!

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Boys Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
Posted

10:00 am - Nacogdoches Central Heights vs. New Summerfield

1:00 pm - Newton vs. Sulphur Springs

1:00 pm - Woden vs. Rusk

2:30 pm - Center vs. Bridge City

4:00 pm - Coldspring-Oakhurst vs. CHSM

8:30 pm - Nacogdoches Central Heights/New Summerfield winner vs. Woden/Rusk winner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Crawford

Crawford

Posted
Posted

Thursday
Central Heights 50, New Summerfield 33
Rusk 49, Woden 38
Central Heights 72, Rusk 61
Bridgeport 56, Jacksonville 52 OT
Peaster 78, Groesbeck 58
Sulphur Springs 77, Newton 56
Laneville 62, White Oak 58
CHSM 80, Coldspring 42
Center 52, Bridge City 42

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baseball_101

baseball_101

Posted
Posted
On 12/8/2016 at 10:58 PM, Crawford said:

Other then Sulphur Springs, who should be competitive for Center, Center should roll right through this touney. Quite honestly, I don't know why the Riders are competing in such a mediocre tournament.  

smh! Because they are not as good as you think they are. if bridge city don't turn the ball over 30 times they win the game against them.  CH will beat them. Silsbee would beat them by 50 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Crawford

Crawford

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, baseball_101 said:

smh! Because they are not as good as you think they are. if bridge city don't turn the ball over 30 times they win the game against them.  CH will beat them. Silsbee would beat them by 50 

I guess BC just couldn't hold on to the ball because they lack the judgement on when or when not to pass the ball. Did you think maybe, just maybe Center caused some of those turnover? Nah, BC is just that bad at holding onto the ball on their own. smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baseball_101

baseball_101

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Crawford said:

I guess BC just couldn't hold on to the ball because they lack the judgement on when or when not to pass the ball. Did you think maybe, just maybe Center caused some of those turnover? Nah, BC is just that bad at holding onto the ball on their own. smh

Some, I will give you that but Watched the game, trust me it's because center is not as Good as you make them out to be.  They are mediocre at best. If they were as good as you make them sound, they would have beat bc by 50 and not 10. not saying bc is that good but could have easily won that game. so that makes center... well, not very good either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Crawford

Crawford

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, baseball_101 said:

Some, I will give you that but Watched the game, trust me it's because center is not as Good as you make them out to be.  They are mediocre at best. If they were as good as you make them sound, they would have beat bc by 50 and not 10. not saying bc is that good but could have easily won that game. so that makes center... well, not very good either. 

Whatever, we'll see how mediocre Center is come playoffs. Oh, I was just told that the Riders had half of the their JV team in during some parts of the game. LMAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Crawford

Crawford

Posted
Posted

Peaster 58, Central Heights 49

 

Losers bracket
Jacksonville 58, New Summerfield 55
Jacksonville def Groesbeck
White Oak 54, Newton 40
Bridge City 50, Coldspring 36
White Oak 53, Bridge City 41
 

Bridgeport vs Rusk
CHSM vs Laneville
Woden vs Groesbeck
Newton vs Coldspring

Saturday
Peaster vs Sulphur Springs - Championship
Center vs Central Heights - 3rd
Jacksonville vs White Oak - Consolation
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 89Falcon
      QB Controversy Brewing in Crosby

      By 89Falcon · Posted

      "Baytown Lee for a qb"? What does "for a qb" mean?
    • tvc184
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      I can fire 5-6 rounds with a semi auto AR per second. That would empty a 30 round magazine in about 6 seconds. With an approximately (slow) 3 seconds to reload, that is about 180 rounds per minute…. with an over the counter semiautomatic rifle. According to Wikipedia the shooting last for 10 minutes. That is time to fire almost 2,000 in semiautomatic.  Would a true bump stock ban have prevented Vegas?  Would a lawful suppressor (with a $200 tax stamp) have done more selective damage before people started knowing what was happening? Remember that is a legal item.  With a semiautomatic rifle the Miami nightclub shooter killed 49 victims as opposed to 60 in Vegas. I guess 49 is  more acceptable than 60…..
    • navydawg31
      QB Controversy Brewing in Crosby

      By navydawg31 · Posted

      Baytown Lee for a qb I heard… 
    • tvc184
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Shall not be infringed was not even an issue in this case.  The Supreme Court allowed and in fact didn’t even debate the ban on machine guns as being lawful.   The Supreme Court only looked at the law passed by Congress, accepted it as law and looked to see if bump stocks fit the legal definition as passed by Congress and signed by the president.  The easy answer was no, it did not and the ATF was making up their own definition which is unconstitutional.  In another comment you stated that bump stocks serve “no valuable purpose”. I agree but do we throw out the Constitution? We don’t need neo nazis  or klan members rhetoric either but are willing to pick and choose who gets free speech? I support the Supreme Court decision on an item that I don’t want even if you gave me one. I support it because it follows statutory law and the Constitution.  Do you suggest that the Supreme Court ignore the Constitution for political or dislike purposes? 
    • CardinalBacker
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      How would cracking down on crime prevented have what happened in Vegas?   The law of the land is no automatic weapons. If you get caught with a switch on your Glock, it’s a problem.  But you can legally modify your AR to get the same results? It’s a loophole that shouldn’t be there legally, and gun owners should boycott.    I love my AR. I believe everybody should get one. But there’s a big difference between a 30 round mag that’s fired semi-automatically, with at least the possibility of aiming at particular targets…. And a bump stop equipped AR that quite simply can’t be aimed. When the left argues that an AR serves no purpose, I disagree. But when some 2A nut is arguing that their fully automatic AR (by why of a bumpstock which renders the weapon useless in regards to accurate fire) is legal, I have to disagree, too.   

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...