Jump to content

Aleddo and Cedar Park going DivII

MrFleet23

By MrFleet23
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

texbuzz

texbuzz

Posted
Posted

current standings with attendance (2 high to Div 1, 2 low to Div 2).  I am not as smart as the rest of you guys.  The only way CP goes Div2 is if Rouse gets in?  If Hutto and Rouse win out and Hutto did beat Rouse, what else is in play here?

1.  Cedar Park - 1949

2.  Connally - 1977

3.  Georgetown - 1876

4.  Hutto - 1775

5.  Rouse - 2006

6.  Elgin - 1305

Others....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
texbuzz

texbuzz

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, texbuzz said:

current standings with attendance (2 high to Div 1, 2 low to Div 2).  I am not as smart as the rest of you guys.  The only way CP goes Div2 is if Rouse gets in?  If Hutto and Rouse win out and Hutto did beat Rouse, what else is in play here?

1.  Cedar Park - 1949

2.  Connally - 1977

3.  Georgetown - 1876

4.  Hutto - 1775

5.  Rouse - 2006

6.  Elgin - 1305

Others....

I think I see it.  If Georgetown loses to Connally, that puts Georgetown outside looking in.  Bumps Rouse in as Div 1 #2 seed.  Is that correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, texbuzz said:

I think I see it.  If Georgetown loses to Connally, that puts Georgetown outside looking in.  Bumps Rouse in as Div 1 #2 seed.  Is that correct?

Yes. Assuming that District 19-5A uses net points as a second tie breaker, that tie breaker would come into effect as the three teams are each 1-1 in head to head play if Georgetown loses to Connally.  Under that tie breaker, assuming an 18 point margin of victory cap, would be Rouse +8 (+18 for a 23 pt win over Georgetown and -10 for a 10 point loss to Hutto), Hutto +7 (+10 for a 10 point win over Rouse and -3 for a 3 point loss to Georgeown) and Georgetown -15 (+3 for a 3 point win over Hutto and -18 for a 23 point loss to Rouse).  That would give Rouse and Hutto the final 2 spots out 19-5A.  As both Rouse and Connally have larger ADMs than Cedar Park, that would push CP to DII.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MrFleet23

MrFleet23

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, dillonpanthers said:

These aren't set. It's projections of what they think will happen. And they haven't been updated since Oct 25th. Could look different in this weeks projections. 

Yeah that's what I was thinking. Idk where folks get accurate enrollments from tried using Google last night got 3 different numbers for Cedar Park. It's not on their website

Link to comment
Share on other sites
songone

songone

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

Yes. Assuming that District 19-5A uses net points as a second tie breaker, that tie breaker would come into effect as the three teams are each 1-1 in head to head play if Georgetown loses to Connally.  Under that tie breaker, assuming an 18 point margin of victory cap, would be Rouse +8 (+18 for a 23 pt win over Georgetown and -10 for a 10 point loss to Hutto), Hutto +7 (+10 for a 10 point win over Rouse and -3 for a 3 point loss to Georgeown) and Georgetown -15 (+3 for a 3 point win over Hutto and -18 for a 23 point loss to Rouse).  That would give Rouse and Hutto the final 2 spots out 19-5A.  As both Rouse and Connally have larger ADMs than Cedar Park, that would push CP to DII.

That's the correct scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TeamJagUS

TeamJagUS

Posted
Posted

GT will beat PC, game is in GT and they are playing to get in. PC's only motivation other than basic pride is helping to push CP down to DII so they won't have to meet them again in DI assuming they both make it that far. It's the old Jimmy the Greek "intangible", motivation for GT is I think higher, that alone won't win the game but they have the horses to do it, should be a great game. I think CP goes D1 as it should be. While an Aledo/CP championship game has allure (assuming alot of things along the way), so does CP/Manvel/Denton Ryan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RHBoiler

RHBoiler

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, MrFleet23 said:

Yeah that's what I was thinking. Idk where folks get accurate enrollments from tried using Google last night got 3 different numbers for Cedar Park. It's not on their website

Schools submit them to the UIL every other year, and the UIL uses those to drive realignment. The numbers are on the UIL website.

This is the hidden content, please
 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...