Jump to content

glen beck, Meagan kelly


Big girl

Recommended Posts

So it has to be one or the other?

YOU sound confused sir
 

 

No confusion here...I am not happy with Democrats or Republicans, but Republicans are a whole lot closer to my views than Democrats so that's how I vote.

 

If a Democrat was running for President that was pro-second amendment, pro- small gov, pro-lower taxes, pro-military...I would vote for them.

 

I do like the sir thing...keep it up.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as the Dems keep creating the perception that, under their management, the government will give more free stuff to the average voter, those who can't/won't think for themselves will vote only one way.

entitlements. .....Steve nash has done it again. What's next Benghazi. It is the same things over and over again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big Girl- Just so we less enlightened folks can understand, go ahead and identify four or five of the Bush scandals that you so happily refer to .  By the way, the Supreme Court just ruled that President Obama violated the Constitution by going around the Senate to name key labor and financial watchdogs?  How did that happen?  After all, you have told us repeatedly how smart he is and how he taught Constitutional law.  I am sure the Supreme Court was, in your view, very knowledgeable when they ruled in favor of Obamacare but I'll bet they don't have any "credibility" with you on this one, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big Girl- Just so we less enlightened folks can understand, go ahead and identify four or five of the Bush scandals that you so happily refer to . By the way, the Supreme Court just ruled that President Obama violated the Constitution by going around the Senate to name key labor and financial watchdogs? How did that happen? After all, you have told us repeatedly how smart he is and how he taught Constitutional law. I am sure the Supreme Court was, in your view, very knowledgeable when they ruled in favor of Obamacare but I'll bet they don't have any "credibility" with you on this one, right?

the congress was in recess 3 days, the supreme court says they have to be in recess for 10 days. He is not the only president to make appointees in this fashion. His lawyers put up valid arguments and they lost. It happens. You guys are making it more then it is. (Like you always do). What about all of his executive orders that were approved by the supreme court? You win some and you lose some.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the congress was in recess 3 days, the supreme court says they have to be in recess for 10 days. He is not the only president to make appointees in this fashion. His lawyers put up valid arguments and they lost. It happens. You guys are making it more then it is. (Like you always do). What about all of his executive orders that were approved by the supreme court? You win some and you lose some.


Nope, the Supreme Court informed the "constitutional professor" about some details of the Constitution.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the congress was in recess 3 days, the supreme court says they have to be in recess for 10 days. He is not the only president to make appointees in this fashion. His lawyers put up valid arguments and they lost. It happens. You guys are making it more then it is. (Like you always do). What about all of his executive orders that were approved by the supreme court? You win some and you lose some.

And you know the BOLD part how?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • The locals have almost finished firing the first ever Speaker of the House from Southeast Texas upon direct order of Trump and his minions.   It's a sad day... Locals have decided that being represented by the most powerful man in the House didn't mean anything.... they'd rather a political novice to represent this part of SETX.  And why is that?  He wasn't MAGA enough for them.  Who cares that it will hurt locally... What Trump says, goes.     Just yesterday I saw Trump on television demanding that we fire Phelan... How he's a RINO, weak on the border, etc... why?  Because he wouldn't overlook the criminal actions done by Ken Paxton, one of Trump's key supporters in the effort to overturn the 2020 Election and allow Trump to remain in office despite the will of the voters.   Trump never even mentioned Covey's name, and I doubt he would recognize Covey if Covey walked up with a cup of coffee.  Who cares that it's bad for SETX?  Not the R voters from SETX!   Then I saw Covey's preacher on a different ad tell a bald face lie.  Why should Phelan be fired?  "He put Democrats in positions of power in the House."  Really?  That's been the position of BOTH parties for as long as anybody can remember.  They ALWAYS give the minority party committee chairmanships.  But in 2022 the Rs decided that the practice should stop.  Democrat voters should not be allowed a voice in the crafting of legislation if there is a single majority Republican seat in the House, according to the Rs.  Representative Government?  Never heard of it, huh? Never did I believe that we'd have an abortion ban, constitutional carry, huge cuts for school property taxes, and Texas law enforcement being greenlit to enforce immigration law.  But it all happened while Phelan was speaker.  Without a doubt, the most conservative Speaker, ever.  But still a dirty RINO for not being MAGA enough.  It would be funny if it weren't true.   I've been following politics long enough to remember when Rs couldn't get elected in Texas... I'm confident that we're headed back that direction.  I mean, it's obvious that with population shifts we'll be turning blue eventually.  I think that the behavior of the leadership of the Republican Party is going to cause that shift sooner than expected.  I won't be surprised to see Democrat Senators and possibly even a governor elected within 12 years.  Maybe less.  The Rs will be a party apparatus without a voting base behind them.
    • Yellowjacket faithful are still pouring into Hudson HS’s Gipson Field!!!!  
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • The game will be live streamed for those that have Game Changer under the Chester team thread.  I believe the radio station out of Palestine will have radio broadcast.
    • For those John Candy lovers (my attitude right now): This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...