Jump to content

WO-S and Vidor tonight/ Post comments here


Recommended Posts

[quote name="Gasilla" post="1426516" timestamp="1377277340"]
[quote author=77 link=topic=113463.msg1426460#msg1426460 date=1377270572]
#6 & #9 are gonna be a powerful asset to the Stangs this year also!
[/quote]

Agreed, #9 first 3 plays were solo tackle for gain of 2, solo tackle for loss of 3, solo sack for loss of 4. Punt. Not a bad first series.
[/quote]

Yeah, I'd say that was a pretty good first series, more like a one man wrecking crew....I'll be keeping an eye on him Friday night.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name="tupac7" post="1426579" timestamp="1377287033"]
I thought vidor played pretty well. They need to tackle better, but overall they beat a very good wos team. I think both teams will be okay.
[/quote]

I was sitting in the stands with a friend from Mexico tupac7 and was explaining to him how WOS has probably put out more pros than any other school per capita. WOS is the measuring stick for programs in the area....4a or 3a. Both teams will be just fine. BTW, I would go with #16 as the QB; #7 seems to me would be better served @ a wide receiver. Y'alls middle linebacker is a beast; those collisions between him and Sage last night were epic!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...