thetragichippy

In some cases, and it appears to vary state by state The statute of limitations did not apply to Jean Carroll's civil case against Donald Trump because she sued under New York's Adult Survivors Act, a law passed in 2022 that created a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors to file civil lawsuits beyond the normal time limits. The law allowed her to sue for sexual assault (battery) even though the original statute of limitations for that crime had expired. The second lawsuit was also able to move forward with the defamation claims based on statements Trump made after the original filing.

I believe that was civil versus criminal.....

Trump said that the suspect was flown into the United States by the Biden administration in September 2021 and that his status was extended under Biden-era legislation. These folks are hard to vet due to limited information. I'm not sure if he as vetted again or not in 2024, but Biden admin has admitted under oath that not everyone brought over was properly vetted. I think the most disgusting think I have watched in the last couple days is the folks that claim the national guard is a target and should not be visible in Washington DC. I'm not sure the realize what they are saying. Has our country gotten so violent that a national guardsman cannot safely walk down the streets in uniform in the capitol of the USA? If that is true, what does it say about our country? IMO, it says Trump is correct and we DO NEED the national guard. It may be time to clean up.

That is what it is going to be.

She would of went down Liz Chaney style......... She is trying to save what she can and be an influencer on X....... What you are witnessing is an attention seeking temper tantrum

Not sure if she is toast.......But all of her cases against Trump have been officially DISMISSED.....

Show me

There is some wording issues. I follow a pretty unbiased attorney on another social media platform. He said the statute granting a 6 month extension seems to depend on whether the dismissed indictment was a "void" or voidable" act. If it was a "void" that likely means it was a nullity, did not stop the statute from running, and the statute has expired. If it was "Voidable" then it was valid until it was invalidated, the statute was met by the indictment back when it was returned, and the 6 month extension likely applies..... Any attorneys on the page care to chime in?

I was told my a friend of mine from India that they have influencing centers so to speak. They have 1000's of cheap phones in the center, all with different social media accounts and all can be controlled by a few people. They want to get something trending on social media they can make outrageous post, getting real people to respond, and it spreads like wildfire and begins to dominate and trend. Also, with a VPA installed, really no way to track location. I really feel that is how the influence political things

Well, 383 murders so far in Chicago population 2.7 million versus Los Angeles with 116 murders population 3.8 million, I'd say they have a problem..... Add a woman being set on fire a few days ago, that would be hard to defend....... Wonder how many lives, mostly black, could be saved if they listened to trump and accepted his help?

Hey @LumRaiderFan, Looks like UT Alum has realized that entire innocent until proven guilty is really a thing. It's weird it took him 10 years of calling Trump guilty on EVERYTHING to remember.....LOLOLOL

Did you really say that after years and years of calling Trump guilty FOR EVERYTHING🤣 It is very hard to take you serious lol

Do you? I'll answer that for you....NO The Judge didn't mention that.....so, that is not in question

Grand Jury sure thought there was enough evidence

I follow a very unbiased Lawyer on X who has avoided posting his opinion about the Comey case. He is pro-Trump but his opinions are unbiased. He represented from free 1-6 victims for free, accepting donations - he was a 22 year DOJ prosecutor. I made a comment under one of his post that it was very strange why he has not commented on the Comey case.....He reposted and said there is a reason...... Last night while not opinionating on the Comey case, he insinuated the appeal may not go well, and lawyers need to lawyer and come up with a plan B...... That does not give me great confidence the appeal will over turn Judges ruling. I really hope there is a Plan B.

Noticed the only quotes are "great mayor" and the rest is opinion and I actually watched the televised meeting (that was public) and what Lumbertonraiderfan said is 100% fact. You TDS people amaze me with how you think of things. The President and Mayor getting a long is a good thing....

Trump said during his first term that he didn't think it would do America any good to go after Hillary, so he didn't. Some quotes below - You're not the only one who seems to have trouble remembering things in context. "I don't want to hurt the Clintons, I really don't. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways, and I am not looking to hurt them at all". "I think we have to get the focus of the country into looking forward". "I feel that I want to focus on jobs, I want to focus on health care, I want to focus on the border and immigration and doing a really great immigration bill... And I want to focus on — all of these other things that we've been talking about".

If the economy does not "feel" better, the Democrats have the advantage......I have a feeling after the first of the year, with a new "Powell" , there will be cuts to prime rate, getting mortgage rates under 6%, - that will spark people that have been holding out to sell their homes, increase supply which will lower cost. Energy prices will continue to fall, which effects everything. <id-terms is not in the bag for Democrats just yet.

They're not siding with Comey, they're siding against the administration. Think about it, very seldom do any from the left agree with anything this Administration has done.

I'm not sure this meets "radical Judge" - a radical Judge could have dismissed "WITH Prejudice" and it would be over

They were procedural issues not merit issues....and apparently the Judge knew that because he dismissed "without prejudice", meaning they can and will be indicted again.

As I predicted, so far, more Democrats effected than Republicans…….or Trump And so far, I see no “relief” for the victims

Why is everything compared to the one black President? Are you going to bring up the Brown suit next? Why didn’t you say what if “Bill Clinton” said it…..that may be a bad example since he committed adultery in the oval office with a girl over half his age…… and honestly, Obama ONLY won because of the white vote….PERIOD. His level of criticism is not even in the same atmosphere as what Trump has had to deal with….and being we now know Obama sabotaged Trump in first term, I consider him to be scum and to my knowledge the first President to do something like that.

He has made these comments his entire life, so I’m not sure why you are surprised. In your opinion @Big girl, is calling someone piggy worse than calling someone a Nazi?

No idea - but I think that should be changed,,,,You're social security is just returning the money you paid in .