-
Posts
31,029 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
93
Everything posted by tvc184
-
Maybe my criminal justice learning from 35 years ago aren’t so dated…..
-
🤣 I just read on X that this guy admired Ted Kaczynski. EDIT: Auto correct
-
It makes you wonder. It has been many years since I went to serial killer school but there may be similarities. Certainly theories and/or circumstances change with time so this may be nonsense or it simply doesn’t apply to this person. Back then I was taught that some of the killers thought of themselves superior to law enforcement and couldn’t be caught. They might leave cryptic messages or clues or just be brazen. Kind of like, I will leave these buffoons some clues but they still won’t catch me. Did this guy want to be caught? From the tidbits of information given by NYPD, he had his own political motivation or hatred toward a situation. He had writing on him maybe like a Ted Kaczynski/Unabomber manifesto but not nearly as extensive. I think the UnaBomber who managed to avoid detection for almost 20 years. I believe it was his brother. who turned him in when the FBI released his manifesto to the public. His brother either recognized his writings or his writing style. Did this guy think that he was clever or as you suggest, he wanted to get caught and it might turn out to be just that simple.
-
Straw Man, yet again. Who has said that the speaker is “so powerless”? Out of the 254 counties in Texas, most are ignored if they have the speaker? Your predictions haven’t been very accurate lately but who knows, maybe your prognosticating has improved.
-
Yep, that’s what I was thinking about. This seemingly big plan… and he still has the gun?
-
Guy might have still had the gun?
-
What do you mean? There is no way Trump can beat her. Y’all will see!!
-
A CB endorsement is like the kiss of death…..
-
WRONG!! Democrats riot when they protest. If Republicans protest, it’s an insurrection. 🤣
-
Cue the riots….
-
George Zimmerman Kyle Rittenhouse Daniel Perry Daniel Penny All political prosecutions…..
-
How many times?? Democrats apparently hate self defense.
-
Not guilty!!
-
He and some of the other Democrats might be perturbed about missing some possible committee chairman positions. With the ongoing fight over the next speaker, we might end up with a Phelan clone.
-
🤣🤣🤣 Maybe we want Paxton and his cronies. What has Phelan brought to SE Texas?
-
The Texas Penal Code, as an example, lists three reasons for punishments. It is to be used as a deterrent, rehabilitation and to punish so as to protection of the public. In a case like this, rehabilitation is out of the question. So is a deterrent. He won’t have to worry about getting in more trouble by re-offending. That leaves purely punishment to prevent reoccurrence. Life without parole satisfies that objective. Having him put to death would certainly be satisfying to many people. I only wish that they had more punishment than merely being in prison without parole. Perhaps hard labor, restricted exercise time out of his cell, etc. If you want to get out of that 8’x8’ box? Hard labor or you can stare at walls all day
-
The judge dismissed the Manslaughter charge at the request of the prosecution. The other option was to declare a mistrial. The judge has sent the jury back to deliberations for the lesser included offense of Criminal Negligent Homicide. According to the way I read the judge’s comments, the jury could not move on to the lesser charge unless they have acquitted Penny of the more serious charge. If the judge declared a mistrial, the prosecution would have to start the whole thing over and I’m guessing that they could see the handwriting on the wall. They were definitely not going to get the Manslaughter charge which is basically murder, but in sudden passion in this case. For that reason, the prosecution asked for the dismissal of the Manslaughter. From my understanding of double Jeopardy, that charge can never be brought up again. If it was a mistrial, then the prosecution could go after Manslaughter a second time. With this dismissal, that charge is now forever off of the table. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision in the lesser charge, the judge will declare mistrial and the prosecution has to decide whether to do it all over again but only for the lesser charge.
-
I can understand that. I am not against the death penalty but I am also not against life without parole.
-
Opportunity for the SETX Kamala Harris supporters
tvc184 replied to Separation Scientist's topic in Political Forum
Such a comedy of errors… 🤣🤣🤣 -
I didn’t believe anything and have never commented on the video or the book. I have neither seen nor read either and had no desire to do so. So wherev did “you actually believe” (referring to me) come from? Also, you conveniently ignored the entire point of my comments. You claim that D’Souza “admitted” that it was “one big fat lie” yet it was your referenced article that shows your comment to be complete nonsense. The only big fat lie was your TDS driven diatribe. I’m sure you’ll come up with some other nonsensical response that completely ignores your own lies. it always amuses me that people post an article to prove a point but then it becomes apparent that they never read the article. 🤣🤣🤣
-
Probably. But I made no comment about Hunter getting away with felonies. I am sure that you missed that. I even brought up both Republican and Democrat presidents who made seemingly questionable pardons. I didn’t choose sides….. like you just did with the classic whataboutism. My only comments were toward the repeated and adamant claims that it would “never” happen. Even funnier are virtually every Democrat whether a politician or a socialist news media talking head not defending the pardon but saying that he didn’t lie. A crawfish has nothing on these hypocrites. Answer your question, Trump probably would, but he did not make a national campaign out of not doing it. Also, I made no comment whatsoever criticizing Hunter getting off. I only commented on the lies that were perpetrated and even today defended. Also note, Biden didn’t just pardon Hunter for the crimes he was charged with. He pardoned him back to January 2014 for unknown crimes that have yet to new discovered. Heck, why not go back to birth? 🤣 The Democrats love to set stupid precedents. Imagine if when Trump leaves office, he pardons every member of his extended family for any crimes that they may or may not have committed. 😎
-
Terrible video. Glad they blurred it out. 😢
-
Once again your TDS either blinds you to the facts or you intentionally did what you falsely accused D’Souza of doing. Were you simply swept up in the emotion or did you intentionally tell one big fat lie? The article that you cited at no point says that D’Sousa lied or admitted to lies. Did you read the article or just the headlines, got severe TDS and your brain neurons went into overdrive, sparking this way and that? You can choose not to believe him if you wish but your statement is completely false. According to the article that you posted, D’Souza said that they based the film on what was believe to be correct information. It relied on a third party’s video backed up by cell GPS data. In fact, according to your article, the data was correct. The false information was that at least one of the people videoed (and blurred) did in fact harvest ballots but it was revealed to be for own family which is completely lawful. As D’Souza stated, they have recently learned that the information was false. Basically, he only admits that he was duped. You can choose to believe him or not. We all have the ability of free thought. Feel free, however to point out where in the article that Desouza “admitted that” it was a “big fat lie”. Point out where D’Souza admitted to lying. In fact D’Souza made this comment quoted from your article, “the underlying premise of the film holds true.” Basically he doubled down and said that the premise of the book was correct. So D’Souza didn’t admit to lying at all but said that the premise of video and the geodata/GPS was correct. He claimed that the information given to him about the reason that the harvesting was in at least some cases, false. So your claim that D’Souza “admitted” to one big fat life, is one big fat lie. Again, were you overcome by excitement on seeing the headlines or did you actually read it and ignore the parts that you didn’t like or simply made a false statement?
-
I watched a youtube video of so many Democrats saying about Trump….. no one is above the law!! As we now see, unless it’s a Democrat’s family. The World certainly will not stop because Hunter Biden got pardoned. There are plenty of criminals out there that haven’t even been charged, much less convicted. It seems overly hypocritical to ever complain about Trump from the other side of the aisle when the people complaining have done worse. People in glass houses should not throw stones and the Democrats sure throw a lot of them. Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton pardoned his brother and so on. Who cares? I don’t recall any of them ever making a campaign promise or a political commentary that they absolutely would not do it. I will gladly point out that both sides do the same thing. Most of the time I think whataboutism should not be brought into an argument. If you did something wrong, then own up to it. Don’t try to dismiss bad conduct because the other guy did it also. This time however, it seems apropos when the left side of the aisle who lives by pointing at Trump for seemingly bad conduct while completely ignoring their conduct. Most of those other pardons have come at end of a president’s term, where he is walking out the door and has no loss politically. It is interesting then as to why now? Is it yet another Democrat attempt at DEI gotcha? Is Biden suddenly going to resign and make Harris the first female president… for about 10 days? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 The entire Biden presidency has been a DEI farce. I suspect no different for these last couple of weeks. Remember that if Biden had not run for Office again, even though he promised he wouldn’t, there is absolutely no way that Harris would have been the nominee. Just like in 2020, where she got approximately 2% of the polls in her favor, and it had to be the first to drop out, she would have been destroyed by the candidates within her own party. This has likely been a set up from the get-go and all of this was planned. Harris got beat worse than any Democrat presidential candidate in decades and by Trump, who had the Democrats put up an actual good candidate, might have beaten. DEI has crumbled the Dems attempt at an empire and I suspect that they will double down and pull one last comedy skit.