texaslonghorn14
-
Posts
595 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from griff in Definition of your Program
With the UIL allowing three and four teams to go to the playoffs, I was wondering what was considered a great program now. So I came up with this criteria for a ten year window, tell me what you think.
1. Exceptional- multiple state championship appearances and at least one title in ten years
2.Great- Semis or better three times
3. Good- Second round or better in five of ten years
4. Average- Playoffs in five of ten years
5. Decent- Playoffs in three or less years
6. Below- Two or below playoff appearances in ten years
This is not perfect but i am just curious of what will be said
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Scatright in Definition of your Program
With the UIL allowing three and four teams to go to the playoffs, I was wondering what was considered a great program now. So I came up with this criteria for a ten year window, tell me what you think.
1. Exceptional- multiple state championship appearances and at least one title in ten years
2.Great- Semis or better three times
3. Good- Second round or better in five of ten years
4. Average- Playoffs in five of ten years
5. Decent- Playoffs in three or less years
6. Below- Two or below playoff appearances in ten years
This is not perfect but i am just curious of what will be said
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from CAL2TEX in Definition of your Program
With the UIL allowing three and four teams to go to the playoffs, I was wondering what was considered a great program now. So I came up with this criteria for a ten year window, tell me what you think.
1. Exceptional- multiple state championship appearances and at least one title in ten years
2.Great- Semis or better three times
3. Good- Second round or better in five of ten years
4. Average- Playoffs in five of ten years
5. Decent- Playoffs in three or less years
6. Below- Two or below playoff appearances in ten years
This is not perfect but i am just curious of what will be said
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from studd88 in Definition of your Program
With the UIL allowing three and four teams to go to the playoffs, I was wondering what was considered a great program now. So I came up with this criteria for a ten year window, tell me what you think.
1. Exceptional- multiple state championship appearances and at least one title in ten years
2.Great- Semis or better three times
3. Good- Second round or better in five of ten years
4. Average- Playoffs in five of ten years
5. Decent- Playoffs in three or less years
6. Below- Two or below playoff appearances in ten years
This is not perfect but i am just curious of what will be said
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Kj Dad in Definition of your Program
With the UIL allowing three and four teams to go to the playoffs, I was wondering what was considered a great program now. So I came up with this criteria for a ten year window, tell me what you think.
1. Exceptional- multiple state championship appearances and at least one title in ten years
2.Great- Semis or better three times
3. Good- Second round or better in five of ten years
4. Average- Playoffs in five of ten years
5. Decent- Playoffs in three or less years
6. Below- Two or below playoff appearances in ten years
This is not perfect but i am just curious of what will be said
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in Definition of your Program
With the UIL allowing three and four teams to go to the playoffs, I was wondering what was considered a great program now. So I came up with this criteria for a ten year window, tell me what you think.
1. Exceptional- multiple state championship appearances and at least one title in ten years
2.Great- Semis or better three times
3. Good- Second round or better in five of ten years
4. Average- Playoffs in five of ten years
5. Decent- Playoffs in three or less years
6. Below- Two or below playoff appearances in ten years
This is not perfect but i am just curious of what will be said
-
texaslonghorn14 reacted to Alpha Wolf in I heard a rumor!
It just depends on the zone boundaries. West Brook will take a hit in my opinion. I don't know if it will be enough for them to drop. I think Ozen will be the greatest benefactor. If divided properly, Beaumont should have 3 5A high schools. Could you imagine that district...
Beaumont Central
Beaumont Ozen
Beaumont West Brook
Lumberton
Nederland
Port Arthur Memorial
Port Neches-Groves
Vidor
-
texaslonghorn14 reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity in BISD scared to play at PN-G?
I think they should play right there at WO-S, cause that's about as close to a state championship either will get to the next 2 seasons.
-
texaslonghorn14 reacted to TopDawG52 in **BI-DISTRICT ROUND INFO**
3A Region III Bi-District
Kountze vs Van Vleck
Tuesday February 23rd
C.E. King HS @ 6:30
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Footballer5408 in Richmond Foster 42 Sheldon C.E. King 28/Final
Brantley 60 TD run for TD
7-7
2:58 1Q
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in Beaumont Central vs Houston C.E. King
If Central had Pasadena and King had Channelview- how did the game end up at Pearland?
Price offered to flip home and home- so the game could have easily been at the Butch. Personally, I would preferred any of the choices ( Pasadena, Channelview or either home stadium ) to driving to Pearland on a THURSDAY night.
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from yellajacket in All-Time State Record Streak Ends This Year !
Yates is not eliminated yet. They sit 2-2 in district with three games to go. When you deal with HISD, anything came happen.
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in Sheldon C.E. King 49 Humble 28/Final
Tre Williams TD run
King 42-28
9:26 4Q
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in Sheldon C.E. King 49 Humble 28/Final
Humble misses short FG with 8 seconds left in half
Tre Williams goes 80 as time expires
King 35-14 at half
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in 21-5A Freshmen Football
STANDINGSOVERALLDISTRICT FOR AGAINSTWINSLOSSESTIESWINSLOSSESTIESKINGWOOD PARK70 50 21677CE KING61 41 196264CROSBY52 41 265121DAYTON62 42 292197BARBERS HILL43 23 160171GALENA PARK43 23 69136NEW CANEY26 15 94112PORTER34 14 168162HUMBLE17 06 94299 -
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in Sheldon C.E. King 42 Porter 28/Final
Look at these stats.
Porter ran 81 offensive snaps to King's 18.
This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up -
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from panther82coog05 in Sheldon C.E. King 42 Porter 28/Final
Porter punt downed at King 8 ydline-
next play Williams 92 yd TD run
King 21-7
1:43 1st Q
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in Dayton @ C.E.King
Still here Buddy. I like the Panthers this week if our Defense shows up. We lost alot of guys to graduation and our young kids need to be ready to play or it will some crazy high scoring games this year.
-
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from panther82coog05 in C.E. King 46 Tomball 20/Final
King up 16-6 right before halftime
-
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from BOYS IN BLUE (C.E. KING) in C.E. KING RANKED #10 IN THE STATE
C. E. King went to third round in 87 (Lost to WOS) and 89 (lost to A&M)
-
texaslonghorn14 reacted to HJ2012 in C.E. KING RANKED #10 IN THE STATE
Not saying my football IQ is very high, but I do know the definition of IQ. Arguing about football isn't debating your football IQ, rather, you use your football IQ to argue topics. It's not a topic to be debated. Maybe if you refrained from name-calling and talking about how much smarter you are than everyone, people would actually take your posts seriously. Then MAYBE you could gain a little credibility on this site.
-
texaslonghorn14 reacted to Stattrax in C.E. KING RANKED #10 IN THE STATE
Man I'm extremely sorry if I offended you and your minion.. I was just looking to get some active stats for the Every mighty Crosby program.. I can see that I have upset you and would like to deeply apologize.. I will keep googling stats for your school to get the information myself.. Might take longer than expected because my Mac has obviously crashed... Every time I Google Crosby playoff runs, etc, nothing is coming up... In the mean time if anyone has this information feel free to post it for me so I can put it in my archives... Although I will have to start a new folder since mine is full, my secondary folder is also full with Nederland and WOS data.. But I have one ready for it when the info arrives... In the mean time I'm getting with Apple to figure out why this info doesn't pull up for me... I'm not the most computer literate person you know, I spend most of my time directing buses to the Isle of Capri, however when they get lost, I just tell them to Google PNG Indians, they can find a map on the website with lots of other information as well... Once again sorry I upset YALL... Just a ole dumb redneck here that lives in small town... Size of a dot really...... -
texaslonghorn14 reacted to Proud Dawg in C.E. KING RANKED #10 IN THE STATE
The coach plays a role in the teams success. Just like the kids make a coach look good. It is often the combo of kids and coach that mae the right fit. That is why some are successful at some places and not at others. If you love or hate coach price, it doesn't matter. What matters is that a bunch of kids are being successful. That is what counts imo. -
texaslonghorn14 got a reaction from Mr. Buddy Garrity in Early Look at Playoff Matches
Wow!! What a thread. Enjoying it.
First of all, Boys in Blue-- thanks for the support for the Panthers but ease up a little. Don't lose your cool.
Second, BMT Soulja/Big Ford- C. E. King made the third round in 87 and 89. Struggled a little lately but trying to bring the program back under Price. Not sure who we will get from 22-5A but have enjoyed the game atmosphere in the past. Good luck in the playoffs.
Finally, Dayton 9210 --I do not believe it would have matter if it was week 3 or week 10 - King got Dayton this year. Good luck next year.