Jump to content

3rdandlong

Members
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 3rdandlong

  1. 6 minutes ago, 3rdone said:

    Nope...I don't do that. Quit assuming things geez. WOS has lost to Nederland and Newton this year. Probably  going yo drop another one to Crosby. To sit here and say this team is AS good as the last 3 or 4 seasons is crazy and anyone that truly knows football would say the same. Newton won. They get the credit. But please for the love of God don't say this team is the same as the past teams WOS has had. Go back to ANY interview with coach T before the season and he said the same thing. Why does that bother you so much?? I meant inexperienced...there, is that better? The most "inexperienced"...semantics geez

    I’m sorry the person you are trying to reach is unavailable please check the number you are dialing or call directory assistance or the West Orange / Crosby page. Thank you and have a great day

  2. 19 minutes ago, 3rdone said:

    How do you know what I support? You took that WAY out of context. This IS NOT the typical WOS team...fact. All the would've could've and should've are neither here not there. They are 1-2, they don't have a QB, and are struggling for points. They are "inexperienced" at most spots on the field at this  year. If you're going to say this team is on par with the last 4 years, you're kidding yourself. With that being said they will be fine, they will make the playoffs, and will be a threat to whomever they play..

    And saying they are the weakest team in years isn't calling them weak. WOS set that bar themselves...but I'll be more tactful...they are the most inexperienced team WOS has had in years. Coach T even said as much.

    How did they do the last time newton beat them ? So saying that are the weakest is not calling them weak?  So had they won last night would they still be the weakest team in the last five years, heck no you would be saying this young team is gonna make some noise.

  3. 16 minutes ago, 3rdone said:

    What's crazy is all the talk in the past about how Crosby would run wild on WOS...and then they finally get their shot against the weakest WOS team in the past 5 years. Kinda sucks

    Try to support them instead of calling them weak, heck add couple missed extra points and they would they would have beat Nederland,, they will be ready for Crosby and give it everything

  4. 14 minutes ago, 3rdone said:

    What does that have to do with anything

    If you know anything about WOS they are barely a 4a and have never suited up more than 30 even back in the day...people get so stuck on divisions. And by lucky I mean that they ran into a very inexperienced WOS. It is 21-7 Newton against a bunch of sophmores with their 5 D1 players.

    It’s ok , One breath at a time.... WOS will be fine 

  5. 7 minutes ago, 3rdone said:

    Just from what I heard Newton is good, but not THAT good (world beaters). Isn't this the YOUNGEST team WOS has had in 4 years? From what everyone has been saying this should have been a 40-0 game. They got lucky playing a very young and inexperienced team

     

     

    Lucky that’s funny. Two divisions higher and Newton got lucky

  6. 8 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

    In all honesty, a Newton D1 isn't like a typical D1.  You can tune in and eventually you'll see D1 kids from other schools playing college ball.  It's kinda like Newton kids go into the witness protection program, never to be seen or heard from again.  

    I've got Newton in this one, regardless. 

     

     

    Kinda like tha cardinals football team, in hiding waiting to play a smaller school 

×
×
  • Create New...