Englebert

I'm curious as to how many Conservative viewpoints are considered "threats" compared to how many Liberal viewpoints are considered the same. I would be willing to bet the targeting is similar to what the IRS did, or even modeled after.

Not at my house, or any of my family's. We always have sweet potato pie. I guess I can check the minority box on my next application.

The topic is who has the ability to understand/evaluate differences between the cultures. I hear the phrase "you can't understand because you have never walked a mile in my shoes". How is that a valid statement when it is a comparative statement. If I have never walked a mile in your shoes, it stands to reason that you have never walked a mile in my shoes. Therefore, how can you say I can't compare the two but somehow you have that ability. If you are trying to say that because Black folks waited on/served White folks in the past...that this lends some insight to the culture of White folks, then you are the one that deserves the obligatory LOL. I've watched the Super Bowl for many years but I've never actually played in one. I've been on the sidelines for a couple of college football games, does that give me more insight to the football culture than people in the stands? And have you or Kountzer actually "walked one foot in a White man's shoes" to give you a believe that you have inside knowledge...knowledge that no White man can achieve. If Black folks have been living in White culture for years, how is it that only Black people have the ability to garner that knowledge into comparative assertations, but White people cannot think in kind? And do you think that many White folks feel uncomfortable in situations where they are the minority because many, many, many people have constantly reminded them of how their ancestors have treated minorities in the past...and that some of these minorities...who now outnumber them...might hold a grudge. Hmmm. And what leads you to the conclusion that White folks feel any more uncomfortable in minority crowds than minorities feel in White crowds?

Haven't White people engaged in this same observation? If you can somehow know a thing or two about White culture, shouldn't White people be capable of knowing a thing or two about Black culture? Are you suggesting this intellectual capability is only present in Black people?

Please explain the difference between Black and White culture. Since this is a comparison, how do you know anything about White culture? How do you compare the two when you know absolutely nothing about one half. And if you are prophetic enough to know about both cultures for this comparison (even though you've never walked a step in a White man's shoes), how is it that a White man somehow cannot do the same? Are you implying that Black people can analyze both cultures for a comparison but White people are incapable of such analysis?

Did we run them off or did they choose to run when challenged to back up their claims? You are not the first to try that erroneous analysis. The archives prove it (to anyone that has fundamental reading skills).

Really? Apparently you are the only one on the board that can't see your blatant hypocrisy. And hate.

Your refusal to answer says a lot. Your posts on here are clear enough though. I'm curious to know if you feel that blatant hypocrisy is a sin.

How about judging others. Is that a sin? Simple question. What percentage of White people do you consider racist?

Or could it be, and more probable, you just see racism where you want to see it. How many White people do you think are actually racist? What percentage?

Can someone please help me out with this simple math problem. For some reason I can't seem to make these simple computations work. We have at least 11 million illegals in this country. We know this because both sides seem to be stuck on this number, although I think it's probably a lot higher. These illegals work the jobs American citizens won't do. We know this because the Liberals tout this notion at every turn. The jobs Americans won't do are low paying jobs. We know this because if they were high paying jobs, American citizens would do them. Illegals are not loners, they have families. We know this because Liberals always say that if we deport the illegals, we will be breaking up families. A person cannot support a family working a low-wage job without government support. We know this because practically every Liberal espoused this notion during the recent “minimum wage” debate. Illegals are not receiving government support. We know this because Liberals have chastised anyone that claims this to be true. Illegals are contributing to the American economy. We know this because the Liberals tell us this is true. So the conundrum is: How can a person working a low wage job with no government assistance support a family while simultaneously contributing to the economy? Bonus question: How does an illegal support his family if he becomes disabled or when he is too old to work?

Baiting? How does an enlightened one...one that is determined to teach the peons their fallible ways...fall prey to such simplistic rhetoric? It seems it is okay for you to insult the intelligence of others, but get extremely agitated when someone responds in kind.

These are pretty much the responses I expected from someone that is thin skinned but a self-described enlightened one that doesn't mind throwing out negative stereotypes based on nothing. Keep wallowing in your hate and we will keep laughing at you.

How about you apologize for calling me and every White person a practicing racist, then I will think about giving two cents about anything you have to say. I have no qualms about breaking out the pedophile card against you after your pathetic revelations. And it's hilarious that you can even think about "winning" a mythical argument that is based on you race baiting, deflecting, then running like a frightened schoolgirl when challenged on your immature but all too common accusations. And I now have zero trust in anything you have to say knowing that your strategy of debate is to blame Whitey.

I had a feeling you would deflect. You make a statement you can't defend then run and hide when confronted. It's what snowflakes do. The laughter continues...and is just getting louder.

Can you translate that? Are you (laughably) parroting many of the snowflake pundits that are actually claiming that Trump has unleased the hate by White Americans to become more prevalent, even after witnessing the hate by the Left in overwhelming fashion? Is this what you are suggesting? I have to ask for a translation because I can't believe anybody can be so stupid or naïve as to actually fall for that crap. Please show me that you are smarter than that.

Somehow I don't feel "educated" by your post. Besides, my issue is with your hate and arrogance, not your beliefs. Was your self-imposed time-out only for two hours? You might need some more time for inner reflection and meditation (or just a plain ol' simple education) to rid yourself of your inner demons of hate and confusion.

The problem is you. That is obvious to pretty much everyone. I still cannot conceive of how you obtained your arrogant persona. I guess when facts don't matter, you can convince yourself of anything. Although you do bring a light-hearted and comical entertainment value to the board, maybe the self-imposed time-out is the best thing for you right now. Don't forget to don your long pointy hat while sitting in the corner.

Why? You can't handle being done to you what you do to everybody else? Pretty pathetic and immature, but somehow you own an imaginary soapbox upon which you perch yourself to "educate" the less enlightened. I don't have to label you...even the 4th graders can see right through your pompous façade.

And your solution is? Oh yeah, blame Whitey for every problem in the world. The 5th graders are now laughing at your obvious "blinded by hate" rhetoric.

You make a pathetic statement justifying a despicable act, you get called out, then you retreat to the act of denial, then jump on the elitist soapbox preaching how us peons cannot understand...just as little feeble minded sheeple have done so often. My question is: How in the world did you ever obtain this elitist attitude. You make pathetic statements that even 6th graders can laugh at, but astoundingly are oblivious to your own sophomoric hyperbole. The next time you post your hate on here, keep in mind the peons are laughing at you. You should be able to hear the thundering laughter all around you. To use condescension in your proclamations just makes it all that more hilarious to normal folks.

Okay, the flu medicine is wearing off. Time to go to bed. I anxiously await the responses...tomorrow.

And furthermore, given the fact that we, as human beings, do not currently possess the capability of predicting who will become violent, and history has shown that Liberal policies are detrimental to the health of a society, shouldn't we dispatch with background checks and just rely on voting records to determine who has the mentally capacity to exercise their second amendment rights?

And furthermore, given the fact that religion is responsible for more deaths in history than anything (I know this because Liberals posture this idea at every turn), should we ban all religions?

And furthermore, given the fact that less people are proficient in gun accuracy (I actually don't know if this is fact, but let's assume), should unskilled gun owners be given larger clips to stop an assault? Back when many people hunted for food, a ten round clip would be sufficient in stopping an attack, and multiple attackers. But in today's atmosphere, is it plausible that the average person can hit an attacker with limited opportunities? Shouldn't we be increasing the magazine capabilities to accommodate for deficient accuracy skills?