Englebert

You are purposely being obtuse or did you purposely not read my post that you quoted, or did you actually not understand that my quote of "Let's get the entertainment value of this board going again" was directed at Bluedove as a precursor of his pending reply. Do you really feel qualified to be in this conversation?

Really? Read the third post of this thread.

What issue?

What news sources should baddog be listening to? What do you consider legitimate news sources? And what news sources are you accusing baddog of listening to that you consider not legitimate? Let's get the entertainment value of this board going again.

Do this sentence take on meaning once you've used ten times? It does confirm your oblivious and non-existent analytical skills. Again, how are you not embarrassed? Better yet, how does it feel having to confront the same tactics you employ? Do you still feel like an elitist Liberal?

Tell it to your brethren. I guess your degree enables you to make such assessments? The laughter continues.

i guess if you would have read my topic of "Calling All Liberals" you would have seen that I stated, and have stated many times, that since Trump won the presidency (actually, when he won the Republican nomination) I have been posting using Liberal tactics. I have purposely been condescending and employing personal attacks, and I have not hid that fact. It is hilarious to see that when posters like you get confronted with the same tactics you employ, you whine like a baby, then actually try to claim you are taking the high road. So no, you cannot have a serious conversation with me, until you drop the Liberal playbook of personal attacks, blatant hypocrisy, and deflection. Until then, I will keep mimicking those tactics. I'm putting on an act. You seem to be very natural at it, and at the same time, not very good at it. And yet you still keep trying. It's still funny that the whole point of my "Calling all Liberals" thread was on this very thing. Although straightforward, I guess it went way over your head.

For someone that has shown a lack of knowledge, you sure do make a plethora of condescending posts. Although unbecoming for you, it is hilarious for us. Keep'em coming.

Lamar University. That backfired on you nicely. I guess that's what happens when you are judgmental. Thank you stevenash. We've "sensed" that a while back about you, hence the condescending posts aimed at you. You have no clue about what I know and don't know, yet you made a judgement anyway, then have the nerve to preach how you don't judge people. How are you not embarrassed? Seriously, how?

Again, TDS at it's finest. If you wouldn't run so much, we can have a debate on who lies more: You, Obama, or Trump. Would you like to have this debate?

OMG! I see your TDS treatment has not taken effect yet.

According to your Liberal press, Trump was unhinged the day he was inaugurated. Since then he has become more erratic on a daily bases. So please explain how he can become more erractic now. Is there some sort of scale? He's been above 10 on your "erratic" scale since moving into the Whitehouse. How high does your scale reach? Can you go any higher than 10?

The official term is TDS moment, and we are used to them by now. The first step is admitting you have a problem. Thank you. You can now begin your road to recovery.

You keep getting funnier the more you post. Please show evidence of my inflated ego. You actually (and very laughably) try to pass off me asking you a question as me in need of help. Remind us of where you obtained your psychology degree. And you claim I have an inflated ego. You are just too comical. Too bad we are not laughing with you. And once again you failed to answer the original (or any) question. Embarrassed yet? Most people would be. And you have the nerve to question stevenash for not answering your question. My original post asked how a Liberal can dismiss guilt when being hypocritical. How did you feel when making that post? How did you prevent an overwhelming feeling of guilt?

You refusing to answer a question leads you to believe I'm diagnosing. Now that is comical. Seriously, how are you not embarrassed (which ironically is the whole point of this thread)? For bonus points, please explain how your post went over my head. (It's very hard typing while laughing, but I was able to get this sentence posted through perseverance.) I know, in typical Liberal fashion you will again run from the questions, try to deflect with attacks, then claim you are intellectually superior. We've seen it before. Maybe the laughter you are hearing is not really just in your head.

Are you refusing to answer because you don't know the answer, or is it because you know how ridiculous your answer will be? One more time (j/k), how do YOU rid yourself of guilt when offering pathetic posts?

I was asking for advice, which you failed to provide in your reply. So once again, how do you rid yourself of guilt?

Really? Based on your response you definitely fooled me, but affirmed my post. How do you rid yourself of guilt?

The ol' equivalency ploy. Both sides do it. Did you even read my post?

I was thinking that same thing as I typed.

I'll need to check the secret history books to formulate my answer. Ooops, I don't have access to those. In all seriousness, I really don't know, and really haven't followed the reasoning for our involvement in Syria. I've heard rhetoric for and against, and frankly don't know who to believe. Maybe someone that has more knowledge of the situation can answer for the Republicans. What are the Democrats thoughts on the issue?

I heard the same thing. I don't know if it is true or not, but it would be a reason to plead guilty. I also heard that Flynn is pleading guilty to this charge in order for Mueller to drop charges for more severe actions (failure to register as a foreign agent, which also has nothing to do with "Russian collusion").

Backup those claims. Oh yeah, you can't. I'm sure your thinking of the ol' mantra "if he's White, he is a racist". Although that qualifies as proof for Liberals, it doesn't qualify as proof on this board. If you call someone a racist that is really not a racist, does that make you a liar? And yet you throw stones.

Like I said, please proceed if you feel the need to endure that embarrassment again. Maybe you can lead us to the source of those secret history books you claim to know about. Can you top the whoppers Obama told? That's rhetorical considering I don't think it is possible for anyone to top his gems. You do know that he said his administration was scandal free.

I'm having an issue that I'm hoping you Liberals can help me with. As I have stated on multiple posts, since Trump has assumed the Presidency I have been mimicking the Liberal tactic of personal attacks when "debating" (LOL) with Liberals. The problem I am having is that I still feel bad after using this tactic. How do you Liberals absolve yourself of this innate guilt? Is it just a matter of conditioning through abundant use or do you employ some other sort of self-defense mechanism(s)? Is it an over-reliance of "the ends justify the ends" mantra? (That one would be lost on me and downright hopeless.) Is it a matter of teaching yourself to ignore controvertible facts? Or maybe employing a tactic of twisting facts to align with a pre-conceived outcome? Or possibly a combination of just ignoring anything that doesn't conform and over-weighting a reliance on conforming data. For any Liberal out there that knows the answer, please enlightened me. I'm also very curious as to how you rid yourself of the guilt of running when confronted to backup claims. I haven't employed this tactic yet, but Liberals seem to be really good at making outrageous claims, run, then re-appear as if the subject was never offered. I'm not sure if I could ever master this tactic, but please share a blueprint of that path. But the biggest feat that fascinates me is how Liberals can endure unadulterated hypocrisy without an ounce of shame. This one seems beyond the understanding of the premier scientists/psychologists. I know I will never be able to compete in this realm, but please share any insight. Since the Liberals claim to encompass the best and brightest (and elitists), I'm confident that many enlightened responses will be imminent.