Englebert

Although the article did state that the Democrats are starting to analyze the data in an effort to correct their erroneous predictions, they are still in denial about the media bias. The article reasoned that the public doesn't trust the media because "they haven't gotten it right all the time", when in reality they are untrustworthy for their blatant bias. And they still haven't learned their lesson. In fact, it has gotten worse since Trump won the election. FoxNews has been doing a good job of showing clips of the mainstream media asking softball questions to Obama, then cutting to clips of the questions being asked to Trump. Even worse is their fawning analysis of the decisions and intentions of Obama/Admin, then compared to their hypocritical analysis of Trump/Admin on the same subjects. I guess when you live in an elitist bubble, it's hard to see your own bias.

According to his post he does: No ambiguity there. Now let's see if he will back up that contention. Like I stated earlier, for that to be happening, logic dictates you would have to have a large, probably (almost definitely) majority of White people in consensus. Recent history emphatically disproves this notion, but the racist stereotype still resides inside some people's minds.

You said that a White nationalist movement is happening. If it was just a fringe element, there would be nothing to worry about. You have to get a large following in any movement to get things done. You believe a movement capable of change is occurring therefore you believe there is a large White nationalist movement. You don't have to specifically state something to get a point across. And none of those programs would have ever come close to seeing the light of day if it wasn't for the very large support and active participation of White people. Same goes for minority elected officials. I never mentioned or even hinted that Black people did not fight for these things, but I will state emphatically that none would have occurred without a large or even majority support from White people. Frankly, it is a simple case of math.

I hear this tired old rhetoric on a daily basis...the majority of White people are racists. The same White people that passed Civil Rights legislation. The same White people that passed Affirmative Action legislation. The same White people that have spent trillions of dollars on minority programs and wealth redistribution. The same White people that elected thousands of minority government leaders and a Black president twice. If the majority of White people are racists, they sure are bad at it.

Can you name one of these "yea hoos"? It's easy to profile and throw out unsubstantiated and ridiculous claims...you know, the exact thing the Left finds intolerable but uses as common practice. Since this tactic has been completely overused, most on here have become immune to such ridiculousness. But keep trying, you might find a pejorative that fulfills it's purpose of allowing you to deflect from the topic.

Odd that her sales increased everywhere else. Does Nordstroms cater to snowflakes?

If he does then we have something in common.

I know this a silly question that will go unanswered, but can you show specifics of what you mean? (I laughed the whole time I was typing that sentence.) I guess the better question would be...Do you think anybody gives one iota of thought to your unsubstantiated, baseless, and thoughtless claims? It is certainly looking like you have joined the melting snowflake crowd. (California is currently experiencing flood conditions after a five year drought.) Sometimes I wish I could just spend most of my time in fantasy land. I sometimes feel like trying it, but am afraid I might never come back to reality in a sane manner. Twisting facts and creating untruths is an easy way to create a mental "safe space" in which to enjoy a perpetual state of bliss. I'm just worried about that hard crash that seems to always accompany the inevitable return to reality.

Is your obsession with Trump just hidden infatuation? Come on, be a big boy. You can admit it. I noticed since Trump came into prominence you stopped obsessing over Hannity. Did you replace Hannity's ceiling poster with one of Trump?

Like the trillion dollar shovel-ready infrastructure package passed by the previous administration. You know, the administration that left us 20 trillion dollars in debt. And I'm with baddog, please show where Trump is spending more money than Obama. What increases has he contributed to the budget? Or did you just float something in your head that you thought sounded good and tried to pass it off here as fact? Or more plausibly, which Leftist leader snookered you into formulating that thought?

In what imagination land did you conceive of this notion? Can you name one single anti-Leftist person on this board, or anywhere for that matter, that believes all gays belong exclusively to the Liberals? Your profiling skills are in severe need of readjustment.

The Liberals are the party of hate, personal hate...that is obvious and undeniable. The thing you misinterpret as "hate" by the Right is opposition to the Left's policies. Sure, you can find examples of personal hate from the Right, but the majority of personal bile comes from the Left. How you can't see that, or won't see that, is way beyond my comprehension. I've lost all respect for Democrats, because they have let a bunch of looney wing-nut Liberal/Socialists define the party. Until the Democrats reclaim the party, y'all will be known as the party of hate.

What are you trying to convey here? Are you implying Trump had something to do with the Korean assassination or are you severely off-topic again?

I bet she had her operatives in New York. Someone needs to monitor the Clinton Slush Fund Foundation for a substantial withdrawal in the last few days.

That's rich considering the childish antics and temper-tantrums the Liberals have been displaying after the Trump election win.

That's because the Left won't report anything positive about Trump. Lie by omission. Have to get the news somewhere. And I noticed you offered no rebuttal. Are you employing the old "shoot the messenger" tactic? And please elaborate on what you mean when you say "Trump says something else dumb". I hear that phrase and many similar ones quite often, but few true examples seem to emanate. I'm not saying you don't have examples, I just want to hear what you consider "dumb".

Come on people. We can't let this thread die. After all, according to the Left, Trump lies on a daily basis. If I listened to them I would have swore this thread would be on page 100 by now. Here's one for y'all: [Hidden Content] And another: [Hidden Content] For most of Obama's presidency California was in a drought. Trump wins the presidency and all of a sudden the drought is over. Must be due to millions of melting Californian snowflakes. Another win for Trump. This guy is better than I ever imagined. Bringing a state out of a drought is no small feat. His accomplishment list already far exceeds Obama's eight year list.

Trump has already stated on multiple occasions he will use various ways of taxing Mexico to make them pay for the wall. I can see why you choose not to believe it, you have been lied to by your political heroes for so long that it is just ingrained in you. Only a wing-nut Liberal can think it is totally acceptable to take millions upon millions of campaign donations from Wall Street executives, then call them "the swamp". I find it hilarious that you would actually make this statement, considering your full and public support of Hillary, when she was the recipient of the Wall Street millions. And only wing-nut Liberals consider successful businessmen "the swamp". This clearly illustrates the ineptness of the last administration. Career politicians worth squat when they are elected then amass millions of dollars comprise "the swamp". Speaking of that, how can a couple that's only had a career in politics be worth a half a billion dollars? Trump and campaign said that his inauguration was the largest ever watched. When you include television and internet simulcasts, they are absolutely correct. This is comical to the point of hysteria that Liberals focus on the tiniest things to display their fake outrage, while ignoring the complete incompetence and deceitfulness of the previous administration. Hypocrisy at it's finest. Absolutely and undeniably fact. Absolutely and undeniably fact. Or is it you just can't think of anything for displaying your hypocritical and fake outrage. I look forward to your next attempt at discrediting Trump. Every time I think the Liberals can't get any more hypocritical and comical, I am always proven wrong. Please keep the fake outrage coming.

If you are on here commenting I know there is an unoccupied safe space somewhere.

I bet everyone at The Onion is kicking themselves right now thinking "Why didn't I come up with this?"

New survey ranks Obama 12th best president: [Hidden Content] I'm fairly certain we could feature these historians on a comedy tour in which they would try to explain their reasons for the Obama ranking, and it would outsell the Blue Collar Comedy Tour. This is certain gold comedic material.

I asking him why he thinks the Indians own this land. What legitimate claim do they have? Laughing at the question leads me to believe you assume that the only humans that inhabited the current United States are ancestors of what we call Native Americans today. Who are these people? Where did they come from? Are they the original and sole owners of this land? Did they steal this land from a more native race of people? Can you answer any of these questions?

For some reason I expected a little more engaging answer than that.

Another victory for Trump! After all, if Obama deserves credit for killing Bin Laden, Trump gets credit for this.

Do you have evidence there wasn't? And there is plenty of evidence of people living in the current United States thousands of years ago. Do you have evidence the people that left these clues are the same Indians to which new tobie is referring?