Englebert

I bet if the camera stayed on a little longer we would have seen the fetal position. It would have been awesome if someone walked up and handed her a pacifier.

It's time to build a statue of Dave and place it right beside Rosa Parks. Both are icons for fighting oppression.

I have a feeling CNN has already scrubbed the transcript and will soon announce that Van Jones is taking a "voluntary" leave of absence for meditation and self-reflection, which will probably consist of Play-Doh, Crayons and therapy dogs.

I'm sorry but I'm gonna need some proof of this one. That is just too far out there to be believable.

I have a feeling she is waiting for Huffington Post to tell her what she thinks about the speech.

For the first time in the last eight years, I am proud of my country! Hopefully the rejection of the hate-filled Socialistic Liberal views will continue.

Ding Dong The Witch is Dead. So long Hillary.

If anyone hears the celebratory gun shots, that would be me. Then again, many people might be doing the same thing.

The question should be: Has he failed to pay taxes owed? Answer that one. And please provide a definition of "fair share". Liberals throw this out constantly but can never define what they mean. Please give it a try.

And yet your only examples are his tweets. You talk a big game but back up nothing. Can you hear the laughter?

Only to you. Do you ever find yourself in a group where everyone is laughing and you don't know why. If not, you have now.

I guess they are being built in Kenya. If they clear enough land, they might find Obama's birth certificate.

Wow, you just don't get it do you. Just because someone is not successful at accomplishing a goal doesn't mean he doesn't want it to happen. If a child wants to be an astronaut, then grows up to be an accountant, is this proof that the child never actually wanted to be an astronaut? If a guy sees a beautiful girl but can't muster the courage to ask her out, is this proof that he never wanted to date her? If a running back is tackled short of the goal line, is this proof that he did not want to score a touchdown? If Obama gives up on trying to get gun confiscation legislation passed, is this proof he doesn't want it to happen? The answer is NO to all of these questions. So no, we weren't wrong. It is just proof you are incredibly naïve, short-sighted and biased.

These are some great times we live in right now. The intolerant, hate-filled Liberals are showing their true colors, and it is hilarious. Some on this board have said they were going to have fun poking at all the material Trump will provide. When in actuality, the Liberals are providing all of the comedic material anyone could hope for. And what's even more funny, they don't even realize how pathetic they look.

You are a little short on comprehension. He couldn't close Gitmo, so he gave up...just like he gave up trying to take our guns. It was evident even to him that gun confiscation would be a futile endeavor, thus he didn't even attempt it. This is clearly evident to the majority of people, but sadly not all. If Congress would have passed a bill outlawing private gun ownership, Obama would have broken his arm trying to whip out a pen fast enough to sign the bill into law. And did you actually think you had a "gotcha" question here? Seriously, did you actually think that? I would hate to think someone that has the mental capacity to perform a complicated task such as getting on the internet is simultaneously this short-sighted.

Right after he closes Gitmo. I answered this in the post you started just for this topic. Do you think plastering it in different forums makes it any more true? Are you trying to employ the Liberal strategy of "If you repeat something enough times people will believe it"?

This total ignorance of reality must come from you living in a Liberal bubble.

Right after he closes Gitmo.

I'm curious as to her explanation of Obama going after reporters, especially James Rosen of FoxNews (who had his and his parents phones wire-tapped) and AP reporters among others, in an attempt to figure out the source of leaks of confidential material, but commutes the sentence of an admitted traitor who stole over 700,000 documents and gave them to WikiLeaks. And many have said that these documents lead directly to the death of Americans. [Hidden Content] From the article, a quote from Obama: "As Commander-in Chief, I believe we must keep information secret that protects our operations and our people in the field. To do so, we must enforce consequences for those who break the law and breach their commitment to protect classified information. But a free press is also essential for our democracy. That's who we are, and I'm troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill the investigative journalism that holds government accountable." So Obama thinks that punishing those that leak confidential material is paramount to the security of the nation, but pardons a man who stole and had published over 700,000 classified documents. It is clear that Obama's choice to employ the "divide and conquer" strategy takes precedence over the security of the United States of America. Personally I think this is grounds for impeachment and a long stay in Leavenworth. Obama could share a prison cell with Manning.

Damn, I wish you wouldn't have said that. Now when I use it, I will have to add a citation giving you credit.

With all of Obama's (and Bill's) pardons and commutations, I think this power should be stripped from the President. I've been advocating this for years. I think a President or Governor should only have the ability to order a new trial. (I would be willing to go as far as saying he can only order a new trial at his personal expense.) One thing I'm unsure about is what happens to people who were convicted under a law that gets changed. TVC, hopefully you can help out here. If a law is enacted, a person is convicted under this law, then the law is repealed, I'm assuming that the person's sentence remains unchanged even though the law is now non-existent. If this is correct, I can see where the President or Governor should have some power to pardon or commute the sentence of these people. Other than that, I can't see a need for anyone to have full pardon or commutation power.

And many of them were talking about how much material Trump was going to provide them. I was expecting a non-stop barrage. With Obama coming unhinged and trying to be a history revisionist about his presidency through his adolescent and absurd claims, I guess they are too embarrassed to get on here and try to defend him. If I was a Liberal I'd be in hiding too. The Liberal hate and hypocrisy is currently on full display. For some reason I feel absolutely no empathy for them.

I'm going to steal this line.

Like I said, I don't know if this is fake or real. Big Girl has a habit of posting far Left "fake news" stories from highly questionable sources. Her response to this was "This is a fake news story. Geez!!!" My post was just to question her as to her source of it being untrue. And as predicted, she refuses to answer.

I have absolutely 100% confidence that Obama's motive for commuting Manning's sentence is 100% political. He knows this will spark outrage from the Right, in which the Leftist media will spin as evidence that the Right hates Transgender people...while ignoring the true fact that the Right hates traitors. If Manning was just a normal white guy he would have never received this commutation. Manning is just a pawn in Obama/Liberal's game of "divide and conquer". This is just more proof he is the worst president in American history.