Englebert

You are getting even more incoherent. I continually try to extrapolate your ramblings, but I can tell you now I'm at a loss. I'm actually afraid to ask you to explain further because I'm guessing it will just get worse. But please try, someone on the board might be able to attach some meaning to your responses. I know I will regret it, but please ask your non-existent question again. I've responded to your STATEMENT of "FBI director testimony before congress" with the obvious "what did he say" question. You refuse to answer then accuse me of not answering your question that was actually a statement. Do you really feel competent in carrying on this topic that you started?

That's the response I'd expect from someone who thinks he is playing checkers in a game of chess. Even you have to be embarrassed by now.

Ok, we can go with logical questions. Glad to see you finally asked one. The mainstream Liberal media fawned over how well Obama delivered his speeches, although they were pitifully lacking in substance. He continually tried to take credit for everything positive while simultaneously finding fault in absolutely nothing he did, and the media and Liberal consensus was that he was the king, close to godlike, for delivering speeches. Trump delivers his speeches with basically the same characteristics, but full of substance and "hope", but the Liberal media ignores his propinquity and basically ignores commenting on his speech giving abilities. So, do you feel that the Liberal media plays a concerted part in defining the substance of the speech based on the delivery? In short, answer you own question.

Really, you set the rules now on what I can include in my posts...you Liberal piece of Obama following fake news troll. Ooops, was that against your rules? Please give a coherent question for us to answer...your ramblings are baffling to anyone with two or more functioning brain cells.

You don't what? This is your second opportunity to explain your fascination with Comey's comments. You have yet to quote or comment on a single thing he has said. Are you now running scared, or worse, curled up in the fetal position because someone dares to challenge you on what is now multiple comments you have made regarding Comey? And what's so, so sad is that you have the nerve to try and call out this board for not answering a question that was never asked. You won't explain your post on this topic or even on the topic you started. If your objective is to be a troll you are very, very bad at it. You may be feeling low and ashamed at yourself, but you can take comfort in the fact that you've given this board plenty to laugh about. In fact, you have probably went overboard for some in which they now feel guilt for laughing.

Can you please make a point? What did Comey say in his testimony that inspired you to start this thread? A better question is how did your therapist respond to this question (I'm guessing with heavy sedation). But I'll take the high road like Michelle Obama says to do (but never does) and just ignore your pathetic and incoherent attempt at a ridiculous topic thread and challenge you to please explain your meaning, or elusive question.

So the topic of the thread is "???", and you have the nerve to say not one response. Your posts are reaching a new low so much so you should be speaking Chinese by now.

Why?

Which one do you think delivers a better speech? For the last eight years we've had to endure the Liberal media fawning over how intellectually superior and how awe inspiring Obama's speeches were. I didn't get it...the words were lacking in substance. Now that a non-politician is delivering from the podium, how do you think they compare? The last two choices were included for comedic sake only. Of course, I could have included many more, but these two were the cream of the crop for hilarity.

Obama's ideology rendered him an imbecile. I kept waiting for him to get better, but he kept getting worse. Trump's worse is better than Obama's best...so if Trump get's better than that is just gravy compared to the idiot we had to endure for the last eight years.

Can you name one of these catch phrases? If you want to go catch phrase for catch phrase I can bury you in Liberal brainwashing strategies. Please, oh please, take the challenge. Obama's whole presidency was mired in catch phrases to keep you sheeple in line. Of course, this will be an embarrassing endeavor for you, but you've shown over and over that embarrassment is not an issue that concerns you.

I'm surprised you caught the sarcasm.

Why don't you give us the Liberal spin so we can have something enjoyable to read. Your sentiment was correct, but you just can't seem to put your sights on the correct target. Keep trying. You got this one half right instead of your usual "miss by a country mile".

Well that response inspired me and changed my way of thinking.

Are these the same polls you, Obama, and the rest of the Dems would ignore because they showed most people wanted Obamacare repealed? Now you are citing them? Pick and choose...pick and choose.

I remember them...gave up on them though. What propaganda are they spreading now? Please provide some links.

Do you really enjoy when people make a slip...enjoy so much that you would holler it out loud. If so, then you must have been hysterical when Obama said he had campaigned in 57 states, with two more to go. This description sounds like the mental age of some that got their candy taken away. And why are Liberals now going to townhalls? Shouldn't they have went to the ballot box instead? Now that is something that deserves the capitalized LOL. You lose! Elections have consequences! Now go back to your safe space! Scratch that last one. I thoroughly enjoy when you post. It lets everyone on this board see your true colors in all their glory. So by all means, keep posting.

Just when you thought the wing-nut Liberals couldn't get any goofier... Don't they realize the Democratic National Convention perpetuates the idea of Liberal mental illness and "otherizes" sane Democrats. (And an I.D. is required to participate.)

We've asked you to bring up Trump's lies and you can't do it. Name some of the outrageous things Trump says...it just proves you are a little snowflake in need of a safe zone.

You do this constantly. Don't be a hypocrite.

I initially didn't like Trump for two reasons: I was highly skeptical about his Republican leanings and I hated his childish name-calling. Since he was elected he has appointed very Conservative appointees, so that has eased my mind somewhat...although he still seems to hold the idea that government is the answer to problems. But the thing I hated the most has shockingly turned out to be his best asset. Liberals have gotten away with unscrupulous personal attacks against the Right for the last 20 years or so, and the Right has refused to respond it kind...i.e. taking the high road. This cost Romney the election. Many GOP politicians have bowed to Liberal ideology in an effort to prevent being branded by Liberals. Finally, we now have a politician that doesn't take that crap, and if fact, employs the same tactics. Liberals have disgusted me for many years, but I always thought the best way to handle such childishness was to take the high road. Trump has turned that on it's ear and has the Liberals showing their true colors. Taking the high road would have never accomplished this feat. I therefore salute, and even employ myself, the low road when dealing with Liberals. Maybe the Democrats will rid themselves of the scum and take back their party before long, and then we can go back to civil disagreements. Until then, I gladly join Trump in his unsavory strategy of fighting Liberals in their own disgusting manner.

I'm flabbergasted that Liberals don't realize that many on their side are pacifists, while the overwhelming majority on the Right are pro-gun rights. But yet the Liberals are the ones calling for war. Maybe they need a crash course on Darwinism.

I completely forgot about this. I read about Andrew Jackson and the Courts during college (many moons ago), but had no recollection until this jogged my memory. Much appreciated.

I'm not going to defend the "kill the messenger" tactic, but I sure would love for you to give examples of Reagan posting "tin foil stuff"? Let's analyze any one of his posts on content, just pick one. Then we can decide who wears the tin foil hat and who should be required to wear a helmet 24/7.

Did anyone ever support Trump's contention? Or did every non-Liberal on here take the "wait for the facts" approach, for which we are still doing? Didn't most Liberals convict Zimmerman before the facts came out, and continually accuse non-Liberals of supporting him? Didn't most Liberals on here convict Darren Wilson of murdering Michael Brown in Ferguson before the facts came out, but continually support the "hands up, don't shoot" lie. Now you want Trump supporters to "confess to supporting a lie" before the facts come out. What is it with you Liberals that shoot from the hip and condemn anybody that has the sensibility to wait for facts. Is it that "holier than thou" attitude? Is it the clairvoyant abilities that only your side seems capable of? We've seen this story too many times to fall for such foolishness. I'm shocked you didn't manage to throw the race card in there somewhere.