Englebert

The Left is doing a great job of creating fake outrage out of nothing, and they know their little sheeple will follow along. How about you prove you can think for yourself and list some of the things that lead you to the conclusion that Trump is "taking down himself". I would love to hear what facts you think are important versus which you think are unimportant.

Since the timing seems to be a key component for you, when do you think he should have fired Comey? The Liberals have been screaming about ties to Russia less than an hour after Trump won the election. Do you actually think your side would not have their heads exploding no matter the timing? Such fake outrage! And Obama fired a ton of DOJ attorneys when he took office. Do you think some of them were leading investigations? Why no outrage then?

So no comment. Why did Obama commute the sentence of a convicted traitor of the United States of America? Manning released nearly three-quarters of a million classified, or unclassified but sensitive, military and diplomatic documents. Do you think Obama commuted his sentence because he knew it would outrage people, therefore allowing the sheeple on the Left to scream about oppression of transgenders? If Manning was a normal straight guy, do you think he would still be in prison? How does it feel to get played like a fiddle? And now that Manning is considered female, do you think he should receive less pay than when he was considered a man?

So, no response from any of the Liberals on here. I get that. It's hard when you find out your leaders have been flat out lying to you for decades. The debunking studies were prevalent and easily accessible nearly 30 years ago, and basically put a stop to all of the gender pay gap nonsense. But in the last 10+ years the debunked theory saw a resurgency, and was a major item on the Liberal platform. Why did the mainstream media let the lie return to prominence? But my real question is why are you not outraged at every Liberal leader who championed this lie? And would you vote for them again even after they have purposely lied to you?

The New York Times finally admits the gender pay gap is a complete and total lie: [Hidden Content] This is not new information by a long shot. I read plenty of studies in the 1990s that completely debunked this myth. How Liberals could fall for the lie for so long is indescribable. And how stupid would Liberals feel if y'all would have been successful in implementing laws to solve a problem that never existed. If Hillary would have won, do you think this paper would tell the truth about something in total disagreement with her claims. Trump has the ability to stop draughts in California and now make a Liberal rag tell the truth. Trump wins again. If Obama gets credit for killing Bin Laden, then you have to give full credit to Trump for the long overdue admission by the New York Times. Hopefully Trump can now get the New York Times to come clean on the Man Made Global Warming lie.

Big Girl might have to join the rest of us and learn how to walk on egg shells.

Where did you say you got your psychology degree? I'm amazed how you can perform a detailed psychological diagnosis based on information from the Huffington Post. And I'm 100% with Stevenash, please give examples of some of the activities Trump has engaged in that lead you to draw your well-thought out analysis. (Ignore that laughter you keep hearing all around you.)

Why did you quote me then give this response? Is it supposed to somehow be relevant to my post?

Please expound on your thoughts. I've asked this over and over and over, but you never comply. Why do you feel the need to throw out baseless statements then run and hide when challenged to back up these statements? Are you not totally embarrassed by your silence? You've been served! (I don't keep up with modern lingo so I have no idea if that is a relevant statement in today's vernacular, but I'm calling you out none the less.) And I'm still looking for the source of those alternate history books you keep referring to. They seem to be so obscure that even Bing and Google have never heard of them...and that is saying something.

Normally I would be in total agreement...shocking that someone would backup his boss. I made sure to include the source of the information, CNN, who has unabashedly dogged Trump from the get-go. It's hard for me to imagine that CNN would post a contradictory statement without the strongly worded confirmation that the only denial is from friendly ground. If an accusation of wrongdoing by Obama was "revealed" and FoxNews stated, without comment, that an Obama administrator denied the report, it would be clearly defined who was doing the denying. I'm overwhelmingly confident that CNN would do the same. The fact that CNN did not add commentary or even highlight who the denier was leads me to believe CNN is convinced this is a non-story. And I'm in total agreement with you...I hope this is a non-story.

Ooops, might be a little premature: [Hidden Content] White House National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster said The Washington Post report that President Trump shared highly classified info with the Russian foreign minister and Russian ambassador to the US is false. Source: CNN

Please expound on what you find offensive? I'm very curious to as to why you think these peaceful protests should be subjected to oppression and denied their 1st amendment rights.

Trump is not a view or a value. What views/values do you think have changed with the Republicans that make you think some faction has taken over the party? I don't think Trump would have won the Republican ticket 10 or more years ago, so something has changed. Trump does not espouse many of the Republican values, so it seems the Republicans have become more tolerant. The Left seems to have moved to the far (almost unseen) left, and do not tolerate non-conformists. What do you think about each party? You titled this thread "a serious question" but haven't given your views. Is this really a serious question for you or did you start it to illicit viewpoints you could then deride. If you are serious about the question you would deliver your thoughts...enabling us to shred them.

How would you describe the Socialist and hateful views/values that have become the zenith of the Liberal platform? My word is "looney". I know that is probably not a strong enough word, and would love to hear what descriptive word(s) you would use. What contentions are you trying to make about the Republican party? What views/values do you think have changed with the Republicans that make you think some faction has taken over the party?

I agree that McCain is a RINO, but not near far enough left to win as a Democrat. The few real Democrats left would have probably voted for him, but the Democrat party has been taken over by looney Liberals. Even Hillary had to adjust her values to fit with the loons. Bill Clinton would have had to severely change his stances to win the Democrat vote today, and he's the old hero of the once proud party. Now the Democrats fully embrace the likes of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. To be successful in the Liberal party today you have to be totally and actively against any traditional American values, demonize any non-minority, and be willing to utilize any method, including illegal acts, of suppressing those espousing ideas that don't conform to the socialistic agenda. So no, I don't think McCain would have won.

Do you have a poll for that contention. Last poll I saw on this (although I quit paying attention to polls a while back) showed that 98% of Trump voters would vote for him again. Who are the smart Republicans that feel Trump is off the chain? Better question is...Why do you think Trump is off the chain? Please give some examples of Trump's behavior that lead you to this expert opinion. I will venture to guess to that your expert opinion is based solely on soaking up too much Liberal diseased media meltdowns. Your leaders throw their little childish temper-tantrums and you interpret this as real news, and follow their every word like a good little sheeple.

What knowledge are you trying to gain from an answer? Every single person on here knows you twist facts to fit your preconceived notions instead of the logical course of letting facts dictate opinions. So what fallacy are you trying fit into your pigeon-holed label? I bet you won't answer with an insightful response. In fact, I would bet money on it.

In that poll that you are quoting...is Hillary still 10 points ahead of Trump? Does this poll still have Hillary winning in a landslide? And you are all in favor of Obamacare even though poll numbers have all been below 50% favorability since the law was shoved down our throats. No wonder y'all lost over 1100 government seats since Obamacare was passed. And you have the audacity to say we are in a state of denial. That is hilarious...and very sad at the same time. And your other topic is just lunacy. Trump could fail miserably as president but still be better than Obama...although the poll you quoted would probably show him as the greatest ever, reflecting the naïve and conformist positions many of the Liberal sheeple are told to believe.

Naivete doesn't come close to explaining this asinine statement. I would venture to guess some other theories but I'm afraid they would all be against forum rules.

If pedestrian, childish, immature two word sentences is all you can muster from my quote, then you need to seriously ponder the station of you life. I know 3rd graders that could have come up with a more intelligent response. How are you not embarrassed is the question that deserves urgent attention.

I guess this is what happens when like minded fellows try to comprehend uncomfortable statements. You refuse to back up your statements with examples of your contentions, and just try to use the old "we all agree so it must be true" childish logic. What a simplistic world that must be.

Yes I do. In fact, I'm fairly certain that there are thousands upon thousands of false accusations of racism for every true one. Liberals like to point to the South as examples of racists, as the North was a little earlier in outlawing the practice of Slavery. Show me some documented proof that more racists currently reside in the South than in the North. I contend that the majority live on the East and West coasts disguised as Liberals. What percentage of Whites do you think are racist? (When answering, please keep in mind that Civil Rights legislation, Affirmative Action laws and trillions of dollars have been spent on Minority causes.)

So you just restate my statement (in a primitive fashion). Why didn't you use the old "I know you are but what am I" quip.

Only in your little world. Just because you say it over and over doesn't make it true. It must be hard having to constantly twist reality to fit your narrative. It seems to me like it would take less energy to just soak up the facts and base perceptions on where the facts lead. To constantly twist and manipulate the facts to conform to your preconceived narrative must be taxing on the soul, leading to tiredness and irritation, then to hate.

I find it odd that many classify this show as a Conservative show. There are four people on the show that express political views, 2 Conservatives and 2 Liberals. Only in a Liberal world can equality mean oppression by angry old White men. Liberals don't want equality, they want to dominate everyone that doesn't share their warped sense of values. Sounds a little like that terrorist group across the pond (and trying to get a foothold here).