Englebert

Nevermind. GameCenter has just been updated to show all four scoring on the homerun, and the score is showing 4-2 Baylor.

Here's what GameCenter on ncaa.com has for Baylor in the bottom of the 3rd: Batting starts Raguse grounded out to 2b (0-0). Cunningham,R singled through the right side (2-2 KFBB). Langeliers struck out swinging (1-2 BFFFFS). Esthay walked (3-2 BSBBFFB); Cunningham,R advanced to second. Menard hit by pitch (1-0 B); Esthay advanced to second; Cunningham,R advanced to third. Dodson, A. homered to left field, 2 RBI (1-1 BK); Menard advanced to second; Esthay advanced to third; Cunningham,R scored. Wendzel flied out to lf (1-0 B). And the Scoreboard shows the score as 2-2. Something is wrong. How do you hit a homerun with the bases loaded, each advance one base, and get 2 RBIs? Do you know what actually happened?

From the article: “Every network and cable news channel is today on notice that the MRC will be closely monitoring their leftist opinion programs and informing their advertisers and the American public when these programs and hosts go beyond political commentary and engage in smear, hate and political extremism,” [Bozell] added. That is going to be one busy group. The Liberal media engages in smear, hate and political extremism on a constant basis.

This is the best news I've heard all year.

And I said Hillary and Obama are Liberals, not Democrats. That in no way shape or form means I think the two are the same. Your comprehension skills are worse than I thought. But that is predictable with a Liberal. You only hear what you want to hear and only see what you want to see. You twist the facts to conform to your preconceived notions. It's much easier to let the facts dictate your beliefs, but that seems to be just a pipe dream when it comes to Liberal sheeple. Hillary saying that there is a gender pay gap that needs to be outlawed shows she is a true liberal. The gender pay gap is a lie, but she relies on false "scientific" studies and outright lies to push this proven fallacy. That's what Liberals do, not Democrats. Obama and Hillary are pushing the Man Made Global Warming lie, based on fake and false "scientific" studies, then claim anyone that doesn't believe exactly like them are science deniers, when the complete opposite is true. They both have lied repeatedly because they know their sheeple will follow without question. That is what Liberals do, not Democrats. Maybe one day you will get the education and/or help you need to bring your comprehension skills to an acceptable level.

And there's the race card with no basis. Pretty much, if not all, U.S. presidents have been depicted with nooses, but someone has to be racist to depict Obama with a noose. That is just clueless and shameful. It's easy to see your rationale, though very hard to understand it. You are definitely a Liberal.

That's like me stating 1+1=2 and you want proof. And I never said Democrats and Liberals are the same...that's just your lack of reading comprehension skills failing you again. It's laughable when someone tries the condescension tactic right after a faux pas. Keep trying though, the entertainment value of this board is going up. You might want to check to see if your search engine has one of those Liberal filters running. That would explain some of your previous posts.

And yet you can't defend any of these statements...spoken like a true Liberal (not a Democrat).

Then they went against their principals when voting for Hillary, because she has stated over and over that she supports gay marriage and abortion (up to the time of birth). And if you think Hillary and Obama are Democrats instead of Liberals, you have a completely different definition of the two terms than the rest of the America.

You should realize Hillary is a known liar.

If you haven't seen one picture of Trump in a noose then your Googling skills need a lot of work. It is a very simple search...so simple even a Liberal could perform one.

Do you really feel competent enough to discuss reading comprehension? In an earlier post, you stated that Israel and Iran both wanted to wipe each other off the face of the Earth. jv_coach refuted that statement by saying Israel does not want to wipe Iran off the face of the Earth, just wants to be left in peace. Between the two countries, Iran is the one calling for Israel to be wiped off the face of the Earth. And you reply with a link showing that fact, but can't back up your statement of "Israel wants to wipe Iran off of the face of the Earth". That can only be Liberal logic to totally twist someone's statement then try to ridicule them for your lack of comprehension. We see it all the time with Liberals...and is the reason Trump was elected. Thank you for you and your ilk in getting enough anti-Liberals to the polls, which prevented another disaster of an administration to assume power.

Where in the article does it say Israel wants to wipe Iran off of the face of the Earth?

I think of it as both. The bigger the government the more they will intrude in our lives, and the more money and personnel they need for this intrusion. Thus, bigger government is more regulations, and the more we pay (monetarily and with our freedoms).

The government got bigger when the Democrats took control of the House and Senate. And yes, I do blame Bush for a lot of the growth. Now compare those numbers to Obama's reign. I can spell it out for you: an increase in Federal tax revenue while simultaneously accumulating $20 trillion in debt. The GOP has not done nearly enough to cut the size of the government. All they have done when in power is curtail the growth a little bit. This is unacceptable and is why I'm for secession. The Liberal Party (formerly known as the Democrat Party) is just unabashed socialists.

I'm shocked at the arrogance of this little...I'll stop right there. He made the statement that "Hate speech is not protected by the Constitution". So he's in the business of adding things to the Constitution that isn't there. But the worst part is that he thinks he is the judge and jury on what is classified as "hate speech" (which is highly subjective and has no formal legal definition). He's a Liberal, that means he is the one full of hate. How in the world does he think he is astute enough or qualified to make this determination. The arrogance displayed is just astonishing. Maybe we should pass a law that says anyone full of hate cannot speak...that would shut him up.

That's all we need...a new worthless Federal department that does nothing but suck taxpayer money and will be full of fraud and corruption. Leave it to a Liberal to complain about how incompetent the government is but constantly advocates for bigger government. Thank God the adults are now in charge. Too bad the Liberals are going down kicking and screaming like little children.

It's hard to get comments from the Liberals when even their spin gods can't muster a semi-intelligent response...though that hasn't stopped them before. Once the Liberal leaders release their idiotic statements designed to keep the sheeple in line, I'm sure one of the Liberals on the board will dare respond...only to get shot down in an embarrassing fashion. Is this why you had no comment on the subject?

Is it because you don't have an answer? Or is it because you don't understand the rationale...which was laid out fairly well in the article and needs no further explanation. (Keep'em coming.)

Are you expecting us to believe you've done a psychological profile on Trump in which you were able to ascertain his intelligence level...this information gleaned from someone whose intelligence level is to call childish names like "grab um". First graders are laughing again. You sure can lighten things up. (Keep the setups coming. We'll keep your real identity a secret.)

Do you know who owned Texas before Mexico? Do you know what the six flags stand for?

Just as I expected, not one peep from the Left about the Man-Made Global Warming lie and the pact that gouges more American taxpayer dollars. I guess the Liberals are still waiting for their talking points from their leaders.

I must admit new tobie, you fooled me "bigly". I just realized that you are a big ol' Republican. It finally dawned on me. Nobody can expose the hypocrisy of the Liberals by accident, or without a hint of embarrassment like your posts. The constant setups and baseless accusations could only come from someone trying to deliberately elicit natural and truthful comments from the Right that exposes the true colors of the Liberals. So I'll have to give you kudos for the charade...and please, keep it going.

That would be Bill, your hero.

Wait, who lies? When you accuse someone of engaging in a behavior that you can't defend, and in the process is engaging in the exact behavior, doesn't that make you the liar?