Englebert

That is not far fetched for Liberal thinking. That is looney thought processes for normal people.

Why didn't you answer the question? It wasn't vague. In fact, BS Wildcat's question was in a simple straightforward structurally sound format. Did you not answer because you don't know, or is it because giving a truthful answer will be just too painful for your delicate sensitivities. Maybe you just didn't understand the question, so I will pose it again: Would someone please explain to me what Trump is doing to create an all out assault on American values? Let's see if you run from the question again.

Spoken from someone that constantly runs. I won't even ask your meaning of "army of cats" because I know you will run.

So what attributes do you admire of Rockefeller or Morgan? Was it the fact that they kept outrageous profits while not paying their workers a living wage? Or perhaps that they did not pay overtime, maternity or paternity leave? Or was it that they wouldn't even consider paying vacation time, sick leave, or family leave? Maybe it's the fact that neither would dare put a minority in a position of authority or supervisory position. Please enlighten us as to which qualities you admire most?

History has shown otherwise. You consistently made statements then refused to "debate" because you didn't have time. That is the very definition of running...and that is no mistake.

This is one campaign promise he better come through on. And please, please, please, someone disagree with this decision. I would love to debate anyone and everyone on Man-Made Global Warming. Just a forewarning, I will start by asking you to provide evidence that man is the main cause of the disputed warming, and to show proof that this warming is detrimental to the health of Earth. Please, anyone who thinks we should stay in this agreement, please respond. I'm guessing the deafening sound of crickets will ensue, but I'm optimistic that maybe someone will disagree with Trump's decision. After all, the looney Liberal leaders will tell you to disagree, but they can't give you any reason. The deafening sound of crickets will surely follow because no Liberal on here wants to debate a losing topic in which Obama looks like the chump he is on this subject. If you think Obama is a chump played like a fiddle by the Man-Made Global Warming alarmists, please defend him. Otherwise, he will be forever known as the worst president in U.S. history. How is that for a challenge?

That's like running up to someone and punching them in the face, then say, "I don't have time to fight you, I have a life to live". You engage then run. Like I said, we've seen this routine plenty of times.

Typical. You get on here sometimes, make a "bold" post, then run by saying you don't have time to be on this topic. We've all seen the routine plenty of times.

I'm not sure why you quoted me to make that statement. Is there some kind of tie-in to my post?

I'm watching baseball...I got plenty of time. new tobie tries so hard and spends so much time trying to find anything he can that sheds a negative light on Trump and his administration. I don't mind taking 30 seconds out of my day to shoot down his posts.

So your idea of "comparing" is plagiarizing? If I'm going to plagiarize someone, I think I would at least pick a more cerebral post(s). I guess expectations might be just a little too high.

That is all it is meant for when responding to new tobie. Thanks for the compliment.

Must be embarrassing to have to plagiarize a new tobie post. And the 1st graders continue to laugh.

Every one knows what new tobie is doing...all that he is capable of. It sure is entertaining.

Is there a website specializing in childish and immature nicknames that you visit on a regular basis? Based on your previous posts, I don't think anyone would believe you come up with these on your own. These are basically at a 1st grade level, to which I can only assume you hope to aspire one day. So I'm guessing you are just plagiarizing from some looney Left wing media sight that specializes in Liberal talking points for the mentally challenged. And it's funny that there is an abundance of evidence of your hero Bill Clinton actually performing said actions, but you conveniently ignore those dalliances but seem to get your panties in a wad by Trump just talking about said actions. Your hypocrisy is just downright hilarious. Keep'em coming. Every time you post it brings a smile to 1st graders everywhere.

So how is Trump a thug president? We have evidence of Obama being a thug president (by your criteria). Where's your evidence of Trump being a thug president? Your evidence seems to be a person shooting his mouth off without giving any evidence, just silly innuendos and baseless accusations. I guess that is just something we have come to expect from Liberals.

How to you read this garbage new tobie? Seriously? And what's really sad is that you feel the need to spread this garbage to the rest of us. I could see if you were inserting this link to show an example of biased and just terrible journalism. But I have a feeling you eat this garbage like candy, conforming to the Liberal drone syndrome like the good little sheeple you have become. And how convenient that the authors chose to focus on what Trump "might do", or "encourages", but gives no examples of behavior. If they wanted true examples of White House thuggishishness, why didn't they mention Obama's Chief of Staff going naked into the shower and threatening a Congressman while he was showering. Now that's a prime example of thuggishness. [Hidden Content]

If Obama would have done the very same thing you would be accusing the Prime Minister of being racist for having the audacity to keep the black man down by standing in his way.

Yep, still imitating Liberals. Liberals hate it when you use their same tactics against them.

Having ties to a White supremacy group leads me to believe he was a Democrat. The fact that he has a history of mental illness and is intolerant of people that don't think like him leads me to believe he is a Liberal.

Only a Liberal can make up a lie about Trump, then accuse him of being a hypocrite when that lie is proven to be a lie. I don't know who wrote this quote, but it is clearly evident they are the one that has no clue about America and it's long-term or short-term interests.

Read up a little bit on all of the women who were forced by Old Bill. You get outraged at what Trump bragged about doing, but you conveniently ignore the many things Bill is actually accused of doing. But that's just typical of you snowflakes. We have seen enough fake outrage to last a lifetime from your ilk.

Right 6.21, Libertarian 5.16 I hate taking these type of quizzes because the questions are so subjective and open-ended it is impossible to garner any type of accurate, or even slightly accurate score. But I love taking these type of quizzes because they are fun, even though I laugh and cringe simultaneously at the nature and wording on the questions.

It was a figurative word in lower case letters. Don't get your panties in a wad for creative license. If you are upset by a word that didn't necessarily refer to you, then you have no business calling anyone a partisan on any subject.

Just like Bill Clinton? When Gingrich faced off with Clinton, he made Clinton bow to him (figuratively). Clinton was full throttle into his wild spending when Gingrich made him curtail and acquiesce to moderate (and even a Righty) agenda. For many, Old Bill gets the credit for being a great president that knew how to work the Congress, while Gingrich gets painted by the Left as a partisan hack. Who was it that shut down the government...twice...during Bill's reign? It wasn't Gingrich. If idolization is due Clinton, Gingrich should be regarded as Zeus. I realize your post had no connotations or elusions to this, I just can't pass up the chance to remind the Liberals that their god Bill Clinton was played like a fiddle by Gingrich, and we are all better off for it.