Englebert

5 minutes ago, Big girl said:

He did. Read his post again

 

Do you actually feel qualified to be in this conversation. If so, why? Answer that question!

On second thought, please don't answer. I don't think I can drag myself down far enough today.

17 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

1.  Debt grew exponentially, even before COVID. 
2. Unemployment exploded while Trump was in office. 
3. The stock market imploded under Trump’s supervision. 
 

When you combine all of that with the fact that Trump lost control of both houses of Congress, couldn’t repeal Obamacare or build the border wall, led a failed insurrection, now faces 91 felonies for crimes he committed during and after he was sworn in, and ultimately failed to get re-elected… he’s the worst President since Hoover.
 

And you can’t point out a single inaccuracy in this post. 

I hate to pile on...who am I kidding, no I don't.

I came across this and thought it was cute.

Ms. Brown, 5th grade teacher, asked little Billy, "What are the effects of heat and cold?"

Billy replied, "Heat expands and cold contracts."

"Good" said Ms. Brown. "Now give me an example."

Billy explained, "In the summer the days are long and in the winter they are short."

Is every statement a "fact"?

Do the statements convey a fact?

You know the answer don't you.

8 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

1.  Debt grew exponentially, even before COVID. 
2. Unemployment exploded while Trump was in office. 
3. The stock market imploded under Trump’s supervision. 
 

When you combine all of that with the fact that Trump lost control of both houses of Congress, couldn’t repeal Obamacare or build the border wall, led a failed insurrection, now faces 91 felonies for crimes he committed during and after he was sworn in, and ultimately failed to get re-elected… he’s the worst President since Hoover.
 

And you can’t point out a single inaccuracy in this post. 

Let me reiterate this where even a child can understand. Anyone who purposely tries to deceive by using "facts" out of context is lying. You are a liar. And you dare question Trump's morals? How shameful can you get?

8 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

1.  Debt grew exponentially, even before COVID. 
2. Unemployment exploded while Trump was in office. 
3. The stock market imploded under Trump’s supervision. 
 

When you combine all of that with the fact that Trump lost control of both houses of Congress, couldn’t repeal Obamacare or build the border wall, led a failed insurrection, now faces 91 felonies for crimes he committed during and after he was sworn in, and ultimately failed to get re-elected… he’s the worst President since Hoover.
 

And you can’t point out a single inaccuracy in this post. 

I didn't think it was possible, but your credibility has sunk even lower. And I can see my football analogy, although simplistic, flew way over your head. Why do you continue to lie?

At least you didn't try to use your word of the day toilet paper in this post.

6 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I saw a similar article in 2020. Some right-wing fishwrap notes that Donald Trump got 74 Million votes, while Joe Biden got 81 Million votes. These clowns pointed at those vote totals as cheating, because no one had ever gotten 74 million votes and lost an election. 
 

As it turns out, there was no cheating, but simply the fact that most  people really hate Donald Trump and will for anybody else. 
 

There’s a follow up story planned for November 2024, when Biden is going to beat trump even worse than he did in 2020, but his myopic (you might have to Google that adjective) supporters are going to once again cry foul, but there will not be any evidence of cheating this time, either.  Reserve your copies now. 

You have absolutely no credibility with me or anybody else with any sense. Keep running your mouth and we will keep laughing at you. At least you are entertaining, and have enough sense to deflect from your provable lies. Tells us about Trump's economy again.

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Where’s the lie? Point out one false statement that tried to pass off as fact. You can’t. 
 

It’s like Trump yelling “they cheated!” Y’all believe if you don’t like facts, call them lies, even though you have no actual proof to the contrary. 
 

Just because you don’t like the truth, it’s not a lie.  

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question. 
 

Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID. 

It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!”

Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours. 
 

What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals. 
 

Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more!

Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!

 

Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more! 
 

It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”
 

 

Just the same old garbage lies. How are you not embarrassed beyond believe for peddling this crap?

Can you please restate that proof of Trump's policies that created a poor economy. I would like a chuckle, well, boisterous laugh this morning.

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

That took ten seconds. 
 

A whack job Trump Supporter/Sheriff from Hastings (Barry County) Michigan-I had to check, there really is such a place. Has been trying for years to push the election fraud lies. 
 

So you basically have a Sheriff of a county that’s roughly the size of Hardin County… a county which was dominated by Trump in ‘16 and ‘20, conduct an investigation across county, state and international borders… investigating a “crime” (election fraud) over which he has no authority to investigate and no jurisdiction to make an arrest finally “proving” to morons that what they really wanted to have happen actually occurred. But you believe that the ace detective work by this LEO who just happens to be one of trump’s biggest supporters made the discovery that will prove once and for all that trump got cheated? lol. 
 

It’s still called manufacturing the lie. Some goofball says it, some whack job “media source” tweets about it, then simpletons spread it around as truth. 
 

He’s basically Michael Moore from opposite world with a badge and you’re lapping up whatever he’s serving.  

You just analogized to a tee the situation going on with the Trump New York trial. And I bet you can't even see the hypocrisy elicited out of your hatred. You once again outed yourself...without any realization of your actions. I'm not sure if Reagan actually set you up to expose your blatant hypocrisy, or if it was just a happy coincidence. You seem to thrive on humiliating yourself. Now get to work on providing that evidence of your emphatic declarations that Trump's economy was horrible. You failed miserably before, I bet you will again.

1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

He’s actually referring to an actual book entitled “Scouting for Boys” written in 1908 by a British Army officer thought to have begun the scouting movement. Waters was probably using this line to show that the kid had a normal life before becoming a musician and a part of the machine (the music industry). An excellent song. One of many by Pink Floyd. 

I knew Waters was referring to a kid having a normal life in that line. That's why I put the LOL on the end. Thanks for expanding on it.

4 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

False. 

He ran the country into the ditch.  And if you blame them Dems, then you have to admit that Trump was powerless to stop them.  Either way, NO ONE can claim he was a good President.   

 

If you had told me that one day we'd have a First Lady with nudes on the Internet, I wouldn't have believed it.  If you told me that the President (proven rapist) and First Lady (with nudes on the Internet) would be on trial for falsifying documents regarding his hush money payments to a porn star with which he'd had an affair, I'd say .... "Never... but if it ever happens, it'll be a Democrat, for sure."

 

Except it really did happen and the person was supported by the Conservative, Christian, Right Wing, Republicans... and he's the presumptive nominee for President after getting his tail kicked up around his ears by the same man four years ago AND is still the darling of supposedly God-fearing conservatives. 

You literally can't imagine this level of ignorance and hypocrisy. 

Dems roll because decent people won't vote for Trump. 

 

EDIT:

 

ANYMORE

How many times are you going to try to peddle those lies? Do you think you are persuading anyone, or do you realize you are just exposing your hatred. Should we laugh at you or feel sorry for you? You tried this before, and made a fool of yourself when challenged to prove your lies. Have you come up with some more whoopers (lies) to promote your ignorant agenda? Please list them so we can have another laugh at your expense.

We see the ignorance on full display every time you post about Trump. It's like watching a kindergartner calling his degreed teacher a moron. I hate to laugh right at you...then again, nevermind. Anyone with some semblance of intelligence should be outraged over a sitting president trying to jail and bankrupt his political opponent. Ignoring this fact is the sign of true ignorance!

In the 1975 song "Welcome to The Machine" by Pink Floyd, Roger Waters refers to the Boy Scouts as "scouting for boys". Prophetic? LOL.

23 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

As I’ve said a few times on here, there may be some witnesses around that might dispute the chicken part.  We’ll see how it plays out 

And there are fewer that realize Obama ate dog. We know how that played out. Let's see how the media plays this one.

24 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

The American people won't put Rs back in charge of the House after how bad they've screwed it up this time... 

And they would be right for refusing to do so.  

The difference between Dems and Repubs is that Republicans eat their own.

 

It's the height of stupidity.  Or depth, depending on your perception.  

The darlings on the right want nothing more than to stop anything that isn't MAGA approved 100%.  They fire their own speakers, primary them, etc.  

 

Dems just aren't as dumb as the Radial Right. 

You give way too much credit as to the intelligence of the American voter. By the way, do you vote?

You have convinced me. I will now vote for Democrats to represent Texas in the House because of the actions of Taylor Greene. (I was laughing so hard I was barely able to type that.)

13 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

She was the only one at the SOTU wearing a MAGA hat. 
 

She is exactly what all of MAGA is…. Moronic. 

Wow. Where did you buy that soapbox? I want one. I wonder how embarrassing I would look on it though. I think I have an idea.

5 hours ago, bullets13 said:

you're doing exactly what you're mad at the media for doing.  you complain about their double standards, but then you're comparing Obama eating dog in a dog-eating country as a small child to Noem shooting a dog as an adult.  I don't like Obama, but give me a break on that comparison.  And let's be clear here, the media didn't sink Noem's career.  She sunk it herself.  Not sure why all of you guys are conveniently ignoring it, but there's a whole lot of talk that her dog wasn't a chicken killer at all, and that she just shot it because it wasn't a good hunting dog and she didn't like it.  If it was eating people's chickens, I have no issue with it, but it's looking more and more like she was trying to get ahead of things and fashion her own narrative before the actual story came out.  for what it's worth, that's the only way her decision to publish this stuff makes any sense at all.  Nobody will ever convince me that she and her handlers thought adding that story was a good idea, and had no ulterior motive to do so.  The reaction to it is the most predictable thing ever, even if the most conservative among us are just totally disgusted that 3/4 of the country disagrees with her actions.

That's an amusing response. I'm not mad at all. In fact, I've been laughing at the seriousness being put into this topic. Oh my, one statement killed her career. Y'all keep up with the over-analyzations while I kick back and enjoy.

4 hours ago, bullets13 said:

no doubt they'll make it as bad as possible, but it sounds like they may be able to just report the facts.  Heck, what she self-reported was enough to turn 3/4 of the country against her, and it sounds a very real possibility that her version of events is inaccurate in an effort to justify her actions. 

If the voting public is so flaky that 3/4 will turn against her because of this news, why didn't they also turn on Obama when it was discovered that he actually ate dog? Maybe because the media didn't play up his transgressions?

And if that is the case, how much power does the media have? They can sink a career for killing a dog, but dismiss and bury a story of eating a dog?

How influential would the media be if someone other that Trump won the nomination. Let's say DeSantis was the Republican frontrunner...how easy would it be for the media to bury his candidacy...instead of him having that perceived cakewalk to president?

I'm just thinking out loud.

Well at least she didn't eat the dog. Then again, she might have become president.

I can't believe this went to page 2 without anyone mentioning Obama eating dog meat.

52 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

My understanding is that he’s being charged with falsifying business records regarding the payment of money to Stormy Daniels. Something along the line of Pecker paying her the hush money, then Trump reimbursed Pecker claiming that it was business deductible payments to Cohen… I think at some point it was questioned as to whether Trump illegally used campaign funds to buy her silence. Or something along those lines. I honestly don’t care to learn the specifics because I think that this particular prosecution is bogus, unless it led to tax fraud of some sort. 
 

A bigger question is why Trump bothered to try and kill the story when his good “Christian” followers don’t care how immoral he is.  Y’all need to repent for supporting that godless man. 

How godless are you? You continue to judge others, but how will you fair when we turn the spotlight on you? Are you morally superior to Trump? Or the Christian followers you denigrate? Can you stand up to the scrutiny?

If we laugh at you, does that make us morally inferior?

6 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

Trump could have went after the career criminal Hillary Clinton, but he did not.  

I hope he doesn't make that mistake again.

17 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

he'll 1000% abuse this if elected and given the chance.  he's like a petulant little kid.  again, I'm voting for his policy, but he's all about revenge against slights and wrongs, both real and perceived.  

I think we are on the same page on most things, but almost polar opposites regarding how Trump will act as president.

I hope you are right on the revenge thing. I hope he nails them to the wall. God knows they deserve it.

41 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.

It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charged solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.

7 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

Surely you're aware of the great lengths Trump has gone to disrupt the elections and destroy the careers of republican politicians who haven't supported some of his most outlandish claims, or dared to question him or disagree with him about January 6.  You and I actually agree on this issue, although it must only go one way for you, because Trump's actions against republicans who didn't fall into lockstep with him is one of my biggest concerns about reelecting him.  The fact that he took action to affect literally hundreds of republican primaries from national elections down to municipal levels across the country, is concerning. It would've been one thing had he done it in an effort to help republicans win. Instead his purpose was to push out his perceived detractors and install MAGA politicians at every level of government in as many places as possible, and has resulted in a fractured republican party.

Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.

12 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

If that's what you want to believe.

Denial is also in that book. Maybe you should read it.

4 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Difference is, your shot was weak. LOL!

At least mine hit the target.