Realville
-
Posts
3,766 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Posts posted by Realville
-
-
Bats should sue Dr. Fauci.
-
-
Bullets13 say your wife was 5 months pregnant with y’all’s first child an you were excited about the fact you were about to become a father then one day she came home an told you she had an abortion because she thought the child would be too much of an inconvenience....would you be ok with that?
-
Proof that this Fake Administration is trying to divide the American People. Disgusting!
-
-
-
I thought taking Aunt Jemima off the pancake box would solve all these manufactured racial issues. The new name is Pearl Milling Company. They were milling over using the name Cracker Jack Pancake Mix but decided against it. True Story.
-
-
4 hours ago, bullets13 said:
My opinion on it is this... you had a bunch of nutjobs storm the capitol. One of them got killed in a highly publicized shooting. Since the officer wasn't charged with a crime, I don't at all blame them for doing their best to protect his identity. I'd think there's a very real chance of some other nutjob trying to come after him (the kind of person that would storm the capitol, maybe?). He was cleared by a grand jury. Knowing his identity doesn't do anything for anyone. If he'd been charged with a crime it would be out there.
They’re protecting him so much that they want even release their own use of force guidelines. I promise you if it were a white US Capitol Police Officer shooting an unarmed black BLM protester....Washington DC would be burned to the ground and all names would be released.
-
11 minutes ago, bullets13 said:
Start another thread, I'll have an honest discussion with you about it. We're really way off topic here.
You’ve been off topic what does it matter? You just want answer the question. I started this thread so please proceed it want be the first time posters went off topic.
-
2 hours ago, bullets13 said:
Not sure where God addressed abortion in the bible. I have zero issue taking the life of a criminal who deserves it. I also have zero issue with someone deciding to terminate an embryo in their own body. To each his own.
So if your wife killed your unborn baby that you was excited about having because she just did feel like raising it you would be ok with that?
-
4 hours ago, bullets13 said:
I'm sure you consider her a patriot.
The title of the thread is the United States Capitol Police refuses to release their use of force guidelines and Who shot Ashley Babbitt. I consider her a military veteran. I smell a lot BS pertaining to her death.
-
-
1 hour ago, bullets13 said:
It's just been a weird dynamic on this one for me... many of the same people that are pissed about this officer making a split-second decision to shoot an insurrectionist breaching the house chambers don't have any of the same animosity towards an officer who spent nearly a quarter of an hour kneeling on a handcuffed subject's neck.
Now that’s what I call a game of Twister! Insurrectionist!😂🤣😂🤣🤣
-
Canada told California hold my beer. How ridiculous! Clown World confirmed!
-
-
Crime in towns that have a high density of licensed gun owners always seems to be statistically low. Amazing how that works.
-
4 hours ago, tvc184 said:
The problem is that there is no inherent right to information. It has to be written into the law. The federal government and each state has its own laws on freedom of information. They are definitely not the same. In Texas there are things that must be released upon request, things that may be released upon request but not mandatory and things that cannot be released.
i’ll give you an example on Texas law. Under Texas civil service law The only thing that the state recognizes as punishment for police officers is a suspension. Punishment (suspension) is part of a public record. All of the corrective actions are sealed and private. Even when a police officer is terminated it is called an indefinite suspension. So if an officer gets a letter in his file of a reprimand, it is not public. If he has his duty assignment changed or the shift that he works changed because of a discipline issue, it is not public and is protected information. If it rises to the level of a suspension, then it becomes public. That is an example where the law says you cannot release information but under certain conditions you must release the information.
Another example under Texas law is the making of a police call for service. If a person calls the police, if the police make a traffic stop or any other type of official police contact, it is public record. How far that public record goes is the issue however. The fact that a person called the police is public including the person’s name (if known) and the address the police went to and the general complaint. An example would be a person calling the police to report his home had been broken into over the weekend. What the police did there if they made a police report can be protected however. If the police made a report or investigation, the public part would be the location, the accused crime or incident and the victim’s name. The details of the report however can be protected. That is why the news media in many cases cannot give details of a crime being reported by them because the police do not have to release the information and in most cases will not. Releasing such information tends to hamper the investigation and by law can kill a confession or the information used at a criminal trial. So while it is not illegal to release the information to the public, it could make the investigation very difficult particularly in the area of confessions.
Those are just examples of how the law differs according to where you were at. Apparently the federal law covering Washington DC has not yet required the police release that information. I am sure that media sources have filed legal issues in reference to this to see if the government is complying with the law. I know in my Police Department (and probably all) we get freedom of information requests all the time and turn it over to the legal department to see if The information can be released.or if we have the option of privacy.
I don’t see how policy is protected but without knowing the law in Washington DC, I simply do not know.
If they want even release their own use of force guidelines then basically they’re not accountable for anything and just doesn’t make sense to me.
-
7 hours ago, tvc184 said:
I don’t know but I wish they would. You would think that merely written policy is under freedom of information.
Lol... Tvc I believe that’s the 1st time I’ve seen you say you don’t have an answer about something pertaining to the law. Something just doesn’t seem right about the case. You would think the freedom of information act would allow that information to be ascertained.
-
8 hours ago, tvc184 said:
1. They have been charged in a crime and it is therefore public information. The officer in the shooting has not.
2. Epstein died a year and a half ago, not in January.
Comparing apples to broccoli.
I understand the officer has not been charged with a crime. He still has not been named after the shooting of Ashley Babbitt. Why want the US Capitol Police release their use of force guidelines? Why is that so top secret? Is that not allowed to be released to the public?
-
We now know these two federal prison guards names after they falsified records on the day Jeffery Epstein supposedly hung him self but still do not know the name of the officer that killed Ashley Babbitt on 6 January.
Officers Guarding Epstein During Death Admit They Falsified Records, Cut Pending Deal With No Jail Time
May 21, 2021 DailyWire.comFacebookTwitterMail
Getty Images: Kena Betancur / TIMOTHY A. CLARY
The two prison guards — Tova Noel and Michael Thomas — assigned to guard Jeffrey Epstein on the night that he died have admitted that they falsified prison records and have cut a deal with federal prosecutors.
“As part of the deal with prosecutors, they will enter into a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department and will serve no time behind bars,” The Associated Press
. “Noel and Thomas would instead be subjected to supervised release, would be required to complete 100 hours of community service and would be required to fully cooperate with an ongoing probe by the Justice Department’s inspector general.”The guards, who were supposed to be checking on Epstein every 30 minutes, are accused of checking sports news and shopping for furniture on the internet before taking a nap during Epstein’s death. The two are accused of falsifying prison records to make it look like they had been doing their job during the time of Epstein’s death.
A letter from federal prosecutors that was filed in federal court says that the two have “admitted that they ‘willfully and knowingly completed materially false count and round slips regarding required counts and rounds.’”
The guards, who were supposed to be checking on Epstein every 30 minutes, are accused of checking sports news and shopping for furniture on the internet before taking a nap during Epstein’s death. The two are accused of falsifying prison records to make it look like they had been doing their job during the time of Epstein’s death.
A letter from federal prosecutors that was filed in federal court says that the two have “admitted that they ‘willfully and knowingly completed materially false count and round slips regarding required counts and ro
-
-
21 minutes ago, Hagar said:
And shame on you for denigrating the National Enquirer. 😂🤣😂
Your probably right. The National Enquirer probably puts out more truth than msnbc. 😂
-
6 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:
Does anyone with an IQ above a moron actually listen to these fools?
The National Enquirer of TV. 😂🤣
Abortion?
in Political Forum
Posted
You specifically said “to each his own” in your comment about abortions. That covers from embryo to 3rd trimester abortions. I doubt very serious that 600,000 to 700,000 women a year are having abortions based on the very rare instances that you stated above. I am talking about abortions that don’t pertain to those very rare situations. So you don’t believe in abortions at 5 months. That’s good to know so at what time in the pregnancy is it good to have an abortion?